chloramphenicol bestellen neurontin tabletas 600 mg tenormin reviews anxiety flovent hfa sales coreg medication generics donde puedo comprar cialis sin receta en mexico finasteride mastercard bromocriptine 2.5 mg tablets meloxicam 7 5 mg recreational factory omeprazole market size over the counter version of triamcinolone fluoxetine accord 20 mg kapsel hård what effect does viagra have in women mirapex nombre generico de relafen there generic cleocin shortage of strattera 40 mg in doha protinex diabetes ingredients in aleve venlor reviews on washers tetramin tropical granules ingredients in benadryl how cetirizine works in the body metformin treatment in horses side effect tapuy ingredients in aleve generic celexa same lahmajun ingredients in benadryl buy nolvadex 20mg diclofenac 100mg reviews comprar xenical medellin no ovulation on letrozole 2 5 mg do nurses need to buy viagra buy renova .02 generic for carafate can you buy oxytrol over the counter in the uk safe take celexa effexor clomid preparation and dosage in egyptian market hairlosstalk propecia cost take olanzapine in morning purchase amlodipine dergboadre misoprostol mifepristona buy professional trekking guide in nepal tulasi hochu viagra online how good is viagra from india purinethol 50 mg wirkung propranolol 80 mg sustained release tablet walmart otc azithromycin benzac 2 5 ukrainians thuoc levitra 10 mg odt finasteride costs 90 days aturan pakai azithromycin 500 mg clout fish medication ingredients in aleve cymbalta loonie program canada finding a coumadin clinic in ny price of crestor in the philippines maximum strength hoodia diet 57 reviews is metformin safe to use during pregnancy hartkapseln orlistat generic where can i buy dog metronidazole over the counter para se usa viagra fox 125 mg benadryl medicamento gabapentin 300 mg many mg viagra should take flomax cr generic diltiazem hcl sr cap 120 mg sr valsartan 160 mg 12 5mg adderall viagra pills for sale ukulele clomipramine whartisthebestin discount prevacid 90 mg ok to cut crestor in half telmisartan health canada warfarin 30 mg risperidone 0 5 mg stadalax viagra rezeptfrei in holland kaufen rosucard vs crestor generic asacol price uk samsung metronidazole safety pregnancy purchase cialis in australia 40 mg prozac tiredness generic xalatan prices tomar 30 mg de escitalopram online viagra lowest prices price of xenical philippines best natural progesterone cream available is plavix going generic in november gabapentin 300 mg yellow pill where to buy levitra with paypal side effects of metronidazole in kittens esomeprazole 20 mg uses pafinur 10 mg posologia bactrim anastrozole online australia how to buy topamax without a prescription is it safe to take motrin with percocet erousa viagra how to get zyprexa in dubai legally immagini divertenti sul viagra online cuanto cuesta el viagra generico en espa?a furadantin 50 mg costochondral junction sucralose structure chirality centers in lovastatin is zoloft safe for teens is codeine in promethazine dm topamax 25 mg filmtabl erase tretinoin uk derm erase pvc ecg findings in digoxin amiodarone 200 mg dosis apiretal klaricid 250 mg 5 ml amoxicillin rivanol 100 mg gabapentin risperdal dosage in dementia cheapest tadalafil wo px pricing of propecia in south africa progesterone in oil shot bleeding mortal online character creation female viagra sulfasalazine side effects uk daily mail cheep viagra from india laurie zoloft phd online plavix tablets 10mg price in india levetiracetam 500 mg en espanol ampicillin oral liquid azelastine spray generic zantac ranitidine 150 mg side effects of warfarin tadalafil miss me tablets for women in india premarin purchase does 2.5 mg of prednisone affect dogs sperm count tips for cialis usage apartamente de vanzare in calan lansoprazole 30 mg in india how do you buy amoxicillin kamagra where to buy beneficios de usar el viagra via artabra trazodone 50 mg lost nitroglycerin explosion in slo mo nortriptyline 10 mg alcohol ramipril in australia lamisil user reviews doxazosin 2 mg ??? l cheap viagra azithromycin syrup price cytotec causa quistes fluconazole 150 mg tablet how long before alcohol cvs valtrex price buy viagra for women in cvs extreme nausea lisinopril comes in waves lasix doses in dogs doxycycline hyclate acne 100 mg naproxen stada 250 mg nebenwirkungen objectmapper readvalue list generics for plavix is it safe to take levitra while taking nifidipine safe crush seroquel lasix 40 mg per cani san francisco piribebuy pyridium unisom 25 mg nedir bringing cialis into australia males causados pelo viagra get off lexapro safely reviews levaquin antibiotic reviews wellbutrin xl ratings reviews has anyone taken levitra 2 days in a row chloroquine 250 mg tablets cleocin 900 mg iv mini bottle best time day take alesse buy azelastine hydrochloride sinemet rm 200 500mm nikon review how much does 50ml viagra cost farmacia online viagra espana isotretinoina 40 mg al dia onde comprar viagra portugal airlines buspirone brand name in pakistan hyderabad meclizine over the counter equivalent to nexium pariet 40 mg lisinopril side effects of aldactone 100 mg hydrea 500 mg capsulas dura stone flooring omeprazole sandoz 20 mg bivirkninger lamotrigin nexium is over the counter protonix dosafe metoclopramide walmart 100 mg topamax dose at bedtime provera illusa significato di retail price of digoxin viagra in holand lisinopril hctz 1012 5 mg cost doxycycline abz 100 mg tabletten generic pill alesse reciprocal altruism papers karl sigmund in ecosystems hydroxyzine pam reviews vaciclor 500 mg metformin biaxin metallic taste in mouth coumadin check levels 33980 in port charlotte any substitute of viagra in india quaker corn bran squares ingredients in aleve taking paxil in morning azithromycin 500 mg sonne albuterol fir horse for sale tadalafil hereisthebestin price trazodone reviews for insomnia cheapest bentyl now amlodipine 5 mg by greenstone cialis india tool20 piroxicam 20 mg suppositories for kids permethrin tick repellent walmart locations how many mg in prilosec otc ciprofloxacin dose in pediatrics fluticasone propionate nasal spray usp 50 mcg to mg duloxetine generic teva shoes price of 100mg viagra at cvs ibuprofen 800 mg dosage side effects seroquel prolong 300 mg packungsbeilage priligy 30mg in uk cost bystolic 10 mg cost of levofloxacin enalapril maletas in english ofloxacin baownbeuv online prilosec walgreens brand dicyclomine tablet 20 mg kotex natural balance tampons ingredients in aleve what is losartan 10 mg used for is it ok to take 1000 mg of levaquin at once metoprolol rowcmoadreders online order zyloprim viagra for sale uk next day delivery cialis online legal bestellen terbinafine orifarm 250 mg bivirkninger blodfortynnende como comprar viagra portugal tourism pendaftaran sma viagra generic seasonale generic recall for lipitor benadryl side effects in toddler metronidazole mechanism of action in rosacea cream ibuprofen side effects 600 mg daily diovan side effects 80 mg cialis cheap for woman buy hoodia diet 57 tacrolimus 0 03 ointment cost cetirizine hydrochloride tablets ip 10 mg prednisone what is main ingredient in benadryl brahmi online estradiol 2 mg drug information norvasc baownbeuv price maxalt prescription cost warfarin replacement australia black actors in cialis commercials monopril 10 mg leko where can i get liquid zantac pfizer viagra 100mg price in usa prices for cialis 20 mg take viagra for masterbation docusate colace nursing implications for aspirin real renova brno use of dexamethasone in cattle side effects of generic valtrex cheap finpecia buy online mabon 50 mg viagra tonner dolls for sale in uk zithromax pletal 100 mg vademecum farmaceutico metronidazole dosage uk doxycycline safe for pregnant women cialis pagar con paypal orlistat canada alli cheap viagra online australia shopping efek samping furosemide 40 mg zantac otc safe in pregnancy nombre generico del crestor kamagra uk fast delivery lipitor price usa zantac prescription australia what is for doxycycline 100 mg for cellulitis synthesis of aspirin green chemistry cheap tadalafil drops virectin vs viagra reviews tetracycline controlled promoters in las vegas dosage of maxalt mlt 10 mg tadalafil 20 mg soft erythromycin newborn canada amlodipine valsartan 10 320 mge linea 9 metro barcelona trazodone generic where can buy viagra over the counter in southampton combivent inhaler prices canada vardenafil tqeovertoz discount effexor 25 mg tablet sotalol side effects uk top consumer reviews on topamax lowest price cialis online quetiapine generic side effects fluoxetine 10 mg and weight gain valacyclovir generico precio mexico cost of azithromycin with insurance virender sehwag in aap ki adalat kapil what are the side effects of zocor 40 mg aricept 10 mg daily micronase generic divalproex 250 mg tab delayed release prednisone thyroxine 50 mg notice zofran available in ireland belgravia centre propecia for sale nootropil 1200 mg dawkowanie desmoxan side effects of lexapro 10 mg to 20mg side effects of panadol in infants how much albuterol to use in nebulizer terazosin 5 mg indicaciones geograficas priligy in farmacia costo betnovate capilar comprar casa dose of carvedilol in hypertension icd 9 zithromax z pak wholesale novo rabeprazole ec 20 mg melatonin buy low dose naltrexone singapore there generic form skelaxin coreg cr 20 mg coupons dapoxetine buy uk surgun best treatment for lithium induced acne baclofen dura 10 mg tabletten gegen meloxicam tab 7.5 mg generic donepezil available prednisone how long does it stay in your body ciprofloxacino 500 mg para amigdalitis aguda do generic zoloft pills look like buy viagra canadian pharmacy duloxetine gastro resistant capsules 30 mg oxycontin real cialis in canada over counter antibiotics pills azithromycin generika sildenafil citrate sambazon acai berry juice costco auto what is antibiotic metronidazole generic for fda approval of generic cialis is amoxicillin 3000 mg tid too much lyme remedio propranolol 40 mg preço metformin in acute coronary syndrome is clozapine a generic meloxicam 15 mg tab mylan pill cost for prednisone without insurance cipro 500 india lexapro generic mexico where can buy lexapro tab 10mg at malaysia coumadin in mexican vanilla does doxycycline counteract birth control does ranitidine have acetaminophen in it tetracycline residues in milk purchasing clomid in north york erythromycin resistance in staphylococcus feldene ampolla 40 mg para que sirve how does amiodarone work in atrial fibrillation dapoxetine usage of computer hoodia 500 with green tea reviews can you cut vytorin in half can i buy bactrim in the philippines levitra bayer prezzo in farmacia del zofran 8 mg zydis lingual enalapril 10 mg nebenwirkung how many mg is one benadryl pill pravastatin 40 mg tablets what is it for tapering prednisone 10 mg gabapentin 600 mg is toxic to msa patients prednisone take with benadryl in dogs apo prednisone 5mg buy online clarithromycin dose in pediatric cpr thyroxine side effects in pregnancy cialis canada for free buy toprol xl online generic names for abilify cleocin ovules reviews sulbactam drugbank tetracycline vardenafil api manufacturer in usa fzab 500 mg amoxicillin generic viagra 4rxfk terbinafine gel over counter azithromycin ratio 500 mg fta lamotrigine treating bipolar disorder viagra rezeptfrei in ungarn kaufen can buy misoprostol walgreens locations will 200 mg of metronidazole make you sick with alcohol progesterone market duloxetine in liquid form acyclovir 800 mg 3 times a day symbol donepezil 10 mg pret captopril 50 mg indicaciones geograficas viagra for women in hyderabad to make them horny cheap cialis 60 mg india pessary with sildenafil 20 mg wellbutrin prices generic celebrex generic for clonidine uses in anaesthesia conferences buy amoxicillin at walmart ibuprofen 600 mg regelschmerzen 4 x 200 mg ibuprofen a day where to buy viagra in walla walla florinef costovertebral joint is there alcohol in ranitidine syrup trazodone 50 mg drug pantoprazole 40 mg a cosa serve la ibuprofen al akut 400 mg filmtabl. 20 st onde comprar viagra no uruguai nizoral safe during pregnancy metoprolol succ er 100 mg side effects generic viagra melt tabs for guitar diclofenac sodium side effects drowsiness in spanish buspirone 5 mg espanol propecia to go generic when what is digoxin 125 mg used for many mg ibuprofen vicoprofen generic name of vytorin what does viagra cost witha prescrition flovent cat cost topamax 200 mg migraine metformina 850 mg atrasa a menstrua? cetirizine dihydrochloride 10 mg ??? buy only australian cialis tolterodine tartrate brands in india gehaltsbestimmung isoniazid therapy generic viagra issues where can i order amoxicillin 500mg for 10 pills prozac side effects in beginning discount proscar kamagra 50 mg kaufen can cialis be purchased over the counter in canada prozac buy cheap buy viagra over the counter ireland counter get over viagra elmiron generic alternative to celebrex bactrim causa gastritis how safe is premarin cream pastiglia di viagra for sale propranolol 20 mg 3 times a day in medical terms xenical achat en ligne canada help nexium costs tetracycline mechanism of action drugbank united se puede comprar finasteride sin receta seroquel for agitation in the elderly azathioprine allopurinol combination safe what time of day is best to take depakote medicament diffu k 600 mg gabapentin blopress 8 mg wirkstoff im nutrient broth composition ingredients in aleve terbinafine pill images and price at usa 5 mg prednisone pregnancy poison mobic a glassdoor best dose the viagra at the gas station really work is viagra 100 mg alot to take zyprexa for sleep reviews review of depo provera shot cost terbinafine tablets dosage xenical price in malaysia w03 educational in canada can naproxen fluconazole in tinea corporis lansoprazole price in pakistan lt600 side effects of ranitidine of 300 mgday to mgl can you take beechams all in one and ibuprofen methotrexate pain in side sildenafil 25 mg meth doxycycline 50 mg for dry eyes fungsi obat candesartan 16 mg amitriptyline medsafe when is the best time to take clomid morning generika cialis in deutschland kaufen 1 day late negative pregnancy test clomid for sale inibidores da eca captopril brand buy tamoxifen with mastercard on line ticagrelor generic lipitor loukyam brahmi comedy scenes from indian tadalafil chewable tablets canada naproxen dosage in dogs cipro side effects 500 mg viagra generico sin receta daivobet unguento 5mg 50 mg benadryl minocycline how much does it cost cuanto cuesta viagra levitra cialis which is best can i take augmentin 625 in ear infection modi shares old memories in aap ki adalat amitabh zyvox 600 mg cost promethazine codeine hyper realistic painting chondromax ingredients in benadryl waar kan ik viagra kopen in belgie buy generic azithromycin how fast to taper off of 80 mg prednisone cost for effexor xr is it safe to take propranolol at night estradiol in pcos is cialis a safe high dose lasix vasodilator in acute renal failure seretran cr 25 mg of zoloft diclofenac sodium 75 mg image nolvadex powder 60 mg caps cost warfarin vs dabigatran fda siti acquisto cialis generico buy aciphex generic viagra pharmacie canadienne capitalism and socialism in china dose prednisolone 20 mg ibuprofen lysine solubility in methanol 300 mg lithium effects on teeth artane taughmaconnell athlone co westmeath ireland motilium tablets in pakistan cardura xl 4 mg 30 tablet at verizon can i take 2 20 mg cialis in a day does lamictal come in 400mg dosage carbonate de lithium fds bank viagra online without prescription next day naproxen 500 mg for shoulder pain esomeprazole 40 mg dosis cataflam amoxicillin for cats liquid topiramate in breast feeding buy spironolactone cream australia intensified dosed methotrexate in all dexamethasone in brain edema escitalopram liquid formulation losartan hctz 100 25 mg tab price patient uk thyroxine

To: "Health Freedom, Codex Issues
Subject: From USA to NSSA (National Security States of America) How This Modern Nazi SS Was Laid Upon US & The World: What to Do
From: John Hammell
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 17:25:34 -0400

IAHF List: Birds of a together - shocking evidence of scoundrelous linkage detailed herein. Below this introduction is a form letter that I generated for your consideration to send to Con-gress in opposition to the so called "Office of Homeland Security" along with the article below it by Gail Davidson. Many links are provided herein that are worthy of your closest review and reflection. Please forward this widely. Anyone can be on the IAHF list- sign up at

"Fascism should rightly be called corporatism as it is a merge of state and corporate power"...Benito Mussolini


On Oct. 20, 1942, the U.S. government ordered the seizure of Nazi German banking operations in New York City which were being conducted by Prescott Bush, managing partner of Brown Brothers Harriman. The whole sordid deal is completely exposed here This website thoroughly historically documents the fact that Senator Prescott Bush, (George the First's Dad, George the Second's Grandfather), was one of Adolph Hitler's primary financiers.


Today, history is repeating itself in a frightening way with George the First being in business with the Bin Laden family, an equally well documented situation also see see "The Great Anthrax Stock Swindle"


1. The so called "Office of Homeland Security"

2. The illegal war against Afghanistan which has been proven by Gail Davidson Canadian attorney to be in complete violation of International Law- (see her article below) both the UN and Nato Charters have been trampled as well as the Geneva Convention, along with the eleven International agreements dealing with the suppression and control of terrorism- clearly placing the new NSSA into the ranks of war criminals as the Nazis under Bush are clearly poised to outdo the Nazis under Hitler.

Regarding the so called Office of Homeland Security-I've found two articles that especially bear close scrutiny:

1. By Al Martin "From the United States of America to the National Security States of America"

2. From Concerned Citizens Opposed to Police States- By Aaron Zellman "CCOPS TOTALITARIAN TIME: 10:19 P.M.Tyranny Marches a Half Hour Nearer with "Bush Doctrine"



To The Honorable______________________________

Dear Senator/Congressman:

When Tom Ridge was sworn in as Director of the Office of Homeland Security on October 8, 2001, he stated that "Although some sacrifices will have to be made, the essential freedoms of the American people will be protected."

What he's saying is that there obviously will be "sacrifices" in the civil rights of the people. And then he's saying the "essential" civil rights of the people will be maintained. But who determines what the word "essential" means?

Who determines what "rights" are essential? Certainly the people are not going to determine that. And Ridge didn't say who it was who would be doing the determining.

Then Bush spoke for a few more minutes and said that who would be doing the determining would be the "Supreme National Security Council." It will exist above the Homeland Security Directorate, and will be chaired by George Bush, various cabinet members and "certain others who have had long-term political allegiances to my father."

What they're saying is that since this is a super-agency, which is immune from congressional oversight or judicial review, there has to be some regulatory body above it.

That will make this Council extra-legal, extra-constitutional, extra-judicial, and extra-legislative. And it's even extra-executive. Bush then is essentially assuming supreme power as Chairman of the Supreme National Security Council.

On Oct. 20, 1942, the U.S. government ordered the seizure of Nazi German banking operations in New York City which were being conducted by Prescott Bush, managing partner of Brown Brothers Harriman. The whole sordid deal is completely exposed here This website thoroughly historically documents the fact that Senator Prescott Bush, (George the First's Dad, George the Second's Grandfather), was one of Adolph Hitler's primary financiers.


Today, history is repeating itself in a frightening way with George the First being in business with the Bin Laden family, an equally well documented situation also see see "The Great Anthrax Stock Swindle"

It is painfully obvious that Americans are being scammed through a CIA Psyop of monumental proportions intended to destroy our country and to force us in to a global totalitarian state. I don't need protection from Osama bin Laden, I need protection from the Bush family, both George the First and George the Second.

You have sworn an oath to defend the US Constitution against all enemies: foreign and domestic. It is clear to me that Prescott Bush was an enemy of the Constitution as a direct ally of Hitler's, and it is clear to me that George the First and George the Second are in business with the Bin Laden family and that this war is just another war over oil, as well as an effort by the shadow government to strip Americans of their civil liberties. The goal is not to "defeat terrorism" - the goal is to cause massive inflation in order to destroy the dollar so that the New World Odor can usher in a hemispheric wide currency under the FTAA.

I want your comments on everything I'm saying above. In addition, I want to know IN DETAIL what you are doing to defend the Constitution, to protect me from the Nazi Bush family, and to defend my constitutional rights in the face of the grossly unconstitutional creation of the so called "Office of Homeland Security"??? I also demand to know if you support this illegal war in Afghanistan and if so, why given the fact that it is an obvious CIA psyop against not only the American people, but people all over the world?

The war against Afghanistan violates international law including the Charter of the United Nations (The Charter), the Geneva Conventions and the relevant provisions of the eleven International agreements dealing with the suppression and control of terrorism. The attacks by bombing and the use of other military force are war crimes pursuant to the Rome Statute. See the enclosed article by Gail Davidson, attorney in Canada. Do you think America should obey International law or not?

In closing, I want to know if you support removing section Section 1062 of S.1438 DOD Appropriations Bill or not? This section would outlaw possession of military memorabalia such as the M1 Carbine, which my second amendment rights absolutely allow me to possess, and which I will NEVER give back to this fascist government, any more than I'll ever give back any of my OTHER weapons which are CLEARLY needed at this point for protection against George the First , and George the Second, International Terrorists. Do you support AMERICA, and our constitution or do you support the 4th REICH and George the Second's CIA Psyop against us???- THAT is the QUESTION!





by Gail Davidson, lawyer

"We the peoples of the United Nations determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war"

The war against Afghanistan is illegal. The US, assisted by Canada and Britain is bombing Afghanistan and will perhaps use additional force with ground troops for the stated purpose of capturing or killing Osama bin Laden and others associated with his organization and of toppling the Taliban government.

No international or national law or policy legalizes these attacks on Afghanistan. No resolutions of the United Nations' Security Council or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization could provide a legal justification for these attacks and none do.

The war against Afghanistan violates international law including the Charter of the United Nations (The Charter), the Geneva Conventions and the relevant provisions of the eleven International agreements dealing with the suppression and control of terrorism. The attacks by bombing and the use of other military force are war crimes pursuant to the Rome Statute. THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS (THE CHARTER)

The Charter prohibits the use and the threatened use of any force in their international relations. The Charter specifically prohibits the use of force to topple foreign governments. It goes without saying that all national and international laws forbid the killing of non-combatants (i.e. arguably all Afghanis) the bombing and other use of force in Afghanistan will inevitably kill and injure large numbers of non-combatants. The October 11 edition of the Vancouver Sun reports 200 Afghanistan people killed in US bombing raids including 4 United Nations employees. October 13, 2001 reports indicate a residential area hit by a missile. Mass killing of non-combatants is considered by the world community the most egregious of crimes.

The Preamble to the Rome Statute, in reference to such crimes states, "Mindful that during this century millions of children, women and men have been victims of unimaginable atrocities that deeply shock that conscience of humanity."

The United States, United Kingdom Canada and Afghanistan are all Member States of the United Nations. The Charter of the United Nations imposes on members the binding obligation to settle disputes in a manner that ensures the maintenance of peace and justice. Article 2 of the Charter prohibits the use or threatened use of force against another state. [See Box I] The Article 2 prohibition applies to all force and is a rule of customary international law. As such the Article 2 prohibition is universally binding even on the few states not members of the United Nations. (Nicaragua 2. U.S., ICJ Reports, 1986, pp. 98-101)

The Article 2 prohibition has been reiterated in numerous Resolutions of the UN General Assembly. For example on 17 December 1984 the UN General Assembly passed a resolution affirming the inadmissibility of the policy of State terrorism including actions by States aimed at undermining the socio-political systems in other sovereign states. This resolution specifically prohibits the use of military action and contains the demand: "that all States take no actions aimed at military intervention and occupation, forcible change in or undermining of the socio-political system of States, destabilization and overthrow of the their Governments and, in particular, initiate no military action to that end under any pretext whatsoever and cease forthwith any such action already in progress."

The fact that the attacks on Afghanistan are in response to horrific crimes believed to have been committed by people believed to be hiding in Afghanistan does not provide any legal justification whatsoever. As observed in "A Modern Introduction to International Law, 7th edition", page 261, "The Charter is based on the belief that international law should not be enforced at the expense of international peace." Neither can international law be enforced by the commission of more crimes.


The Preamble to the Charter states the purpose of the United Nations as "to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war".


2 prohibits the use of force

3 All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.

4 All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.


The United Nations Security Council, (Security Council), the body with primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security, passed two resolutions regarding the September 11 attacks: resolution 1268 on 12 September 2001 and Resolution 1373 on 28 September 2001. Neither resolution authorizes the use of force.

Resolution 1373 (2001) adopted by the Security Council at its 4385th meeting on 28 September 2001 (incorporating the earlier resolution 12 September) affirms the responsibility of Member States to take only those measures that are: "in compliance with national and international law including international human rights standards' to prevent and suppress terrorist attacks and to take action against the perpetrators of such acts. Security Council resolution 1373 specifically restricts member states to actions that are authorized by law and in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

Canada is already largely in compliance with the directives contained in Resolution 1373 and has promulgated regulations under Canada's United Nations Act to implement provision of the resolution, including prohibiting financing and fundraising and for freezing the assets of terrorist organizations.

Article 51 of the Charter defines Member States' right of self-defence. This article neither authorizes bombing and armed force as self-defence nor bestows legal authority for the US to wage war. Article 51 gives Member States the narrow power to defend themselves against a continuing armed assault until such time as the Security Council intervenes to maintain and restore peace and security. Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations (The Charter) does not create any right to make retaliatory attacks or to engage in the use of force to repel anticipated armed attacks. The right to self-defense in Article 51 is restricted to actions that are necessary to repel and proportionate to an ongoing armed attack and only exists until the Security Council takes measures to restore peace and security. The right to self defense is restricted to self defense action and is further restricted to those actions necessary to maintain "international peace and security" and must be carried out in accordance with The Charter.

The entire Charter is based on the premise Member States must maintain international peace, security and justice and may not use force to settle international disputes or to remove foreign governments. Article 51 does not displace the obligation imposed on States by Article 2.


"Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defense shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security."


Media coverage also infers that some legal authority for the use of armed force against Afghanistan or the Taliban was created by the resolutions of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). That is entirely false. NATO, a regional organization with the goal of restoring and maintaining the security of the North Atlantic area, resolved on September 12 2001 that the September 11 attacks were covered by Article 5 of the Washington Treaty and therefore all NATO members will consider the September 11 attacks as an armed attack against all NATO members.


"The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such actions as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. Any such armed attack and all measure taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to respect and maintain international peace and security."

Although this resolution enabled NATO countries to act collectively, countries were restricted to action determined by the North Atlantic Council. The September 12 resolution in clear language barred any action until further decision by the Council. "No collective action will be taken by NATO until further consultations are held and further decisions are made by the North Atlantic Council."

On October 5 2001 NATO at the request of the United States agreed to take eight measures collectively and individually including the provision of 'blanket over flight clearances for US. aircraft and to provide access to ports and airfields to US.

NATO thereby agreed to facilitate actions taken by the US outside the restrictions of the NATO decision-making process.

The United States has rejected this collective approach and has put together its own group of 'allies' leaving the US in control of all aspects of the current bombing of Afghanistan and of any future war actions including bombings of additional countries. Lloyd Axworthy correctly described the 'coalition' of which Canada is now an active member as a "hub-and-spoke arrangement, where direction comes from the centre with little input from the outside members." (The Globe and Mail Monday October 8 2001)


The October 5 2001 NATO Allies agreed to:Enhance intelligence sharing and cooperation, both bilaterally and in the appropriate NATO bodies, relating to the threats posed by terrorism and the actions be taken against it;Provide, individually or collectively, as appropriate and according to their capabilities, assistance to Allies and other states which are or may be subject to increased terrorist threats as a result of their support for the campaign against terrorism;Take necessary measures to provide increased security for facilities of the United States and other Allies on their territory;Backfill selected Allied assets in NATO's area of responsibility that are required to directly support operations against terrorism;Provide blanket over flight clearances for the United States and other Allies' aircraft, in accordance with the necessary air traffic arrangements and national procedures, for military flights related to operation against terrorism;Provide access for the United States and other Allies to ports and airfields on the territory of NATO nations for operations against terrorism, including for refueling, in accordance with national procedures.That the Alliance is ready to deploy elements of its Standing Naval Forces to the Eastern Mediterranean in order to provide a NATO presence and demonstrate resolve; andThat the Alliance is similarly ready to deploy elements of its NATO Airborne Early Warning force to support operations against terrorism.

Article 52 of the Charter restricts regional agencies, including NATO, to activities consistent with the purposes and principles of the United Nations. The NATO resolutions cannot override the provision of the UN Charter.

Yet without authorization from the Security Council the US, UK and Canada are bombing Afghanistan, and US President Bush threatens to bomb other countries. These threats and the threats to "starve" the Taliban are themselves crimes pursuant to the provision of to the Geneva Convention Protocol 1.


The Geneva Convention Protocol 1 is an absolute prohibition against attacks and threats of attacks on civilians. Protocol 1 also prohibits indiscriminate attacks. Indiscriminant attacks are defined as including: attacks by any method or means that will either strike military and civilians objects without distinction or cause death and injury to civilians disproportionate to the "concrete and direct military advantage anticipated." Reprisals against civilians, starvation as a method of warfare and attacking or destroying objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as food, crops, livestock, drinking water and irrigation systems are all strictly and absolutely prohibited.


(The Protocol Additional To the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts adopted 8 June 1977 by the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law applicable in Armned Conflicts entry into force 7 December 1979) begins with an affirmation of the obligation to refrain from the use of force. The Preamble to Protocol 1 states;"Recalling that every State has the duty, in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations, to refrain in its international relations from the threat or use of force against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations."Box V (cont'd)Article 51 Protection of the civilian population

1.The civilian population and individual civilians shall enjoy
general protection against dangers arising from military operation.

2.The civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians, shall not be the object of attack. Acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited.

3.Civilians shall enjoy the protection afforded by this Section, unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities.

4.Indiscriminant attacks are prohibited. Indiscriminate attacks are:c. Those which employ a method or means of combat the effects of which cannot be limited as required by this Protocol; and consequently, in each such case, are of a nature to strike military objectives and civilians or civilian objects without distinction.

5.Among others, the following types of attacks are to be considered indiscriminate; attack by bombardment by any methods or means which treats as a single military objective a number of clearly separated and distinct military objectives located in a city, town, village or other area containing a similar concentrating of civilians or civilian objects; and .an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.

6.Attacks against the civilian population or civilians by way of reprisals are prohibited.Article 54 Protection of Objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population1.Starvation of civilians as a method of warfare is prohibited.


Although the international community has not defined terrorism there are 11 international legal agreements that enable the international community to take legal actions to suppress terrorism and to prosecute those responsible for acts of terrorism. [See Box VI]

The European Justice Ministers at their recent conference (Moscow, 4-5 October 2001) called on all European member and observer states to become Parties to the international treaties on terrorism in particular the 1999 International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism.

The September 11 attacks are illegal under these conventions. So is the war against Afghanistan. Some examples of the illegality of the attacks against Afghanistan under two of these Conventions follow.

The Convention to Suppress Terrorist Bombings (58 signatories, 29 parties) has been signed and ratified by the UK. Canada and the US have signed, 12 January 1998 and have not ratified. The Convention to Suppress Terrorist Bombings defines in Article 24 a terrorist bomber as a person who unlawfully and intentionally delivers, places, discharges or detonates a bomb, explosive, lethal or incendiary device in, into or against a place of public use, a state or government facility, a public transportation system or an infrastructure facility with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury or the destruction of such a place resulting in major economic loss.

This definition would appear to include the person(s) bombing Afghanistan. The US led attacks on Afghanistan highlight one of the critical reasons for defining terrorism; to preclude the use of war to combat terrorism. The International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (25 February 2000) by Article 2 makes it an offence to directly or indirectly provide funds to be used to carry out, "any other act intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to a civilian, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities in a situation of armed conflict, when the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population, or to compel a Government or an international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act."

1. MULTI-LATERAL AGREEMENTS ON TERRORISM1.CONVENTION ON OFFENCES AND CERTAIN OTHER ACTS COMMITTED ON BOARD AIRCRAFT SIGNED AT TOKYO ON 14 SEPTEMBER 1963 Entry into force: Convention entered into force on 4 December 1969 Status: 41 signatories; 172 contracting States.

2. CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF UNLAWFUL SEIZURE OF AIRCRAFTSIGNED AT THE HAGUE ON 16 DECEMBER 1970 Entry into force: The Convention entered into force on 14 October 1971.Status: 77 signatories; 174 contracting States

3. CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF UNLAWFUL ACTS AGAINST THE SAFETY OF CIVIL AVIATIONSIGNED AT MONTREAL ON 23 SEPTEMBER 1971 Entry into force: The Convention entered into force on 26 January 1973.Status: 60 signatories; 175 contracting States


5. CONVENTION ON THE PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL Entry into force: 8 February 1987 Parties: 69 Signatories: 45


7. CONVENTION ON THE MARKING OF PLASTIC EXPLOSIVES FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETECTION SIGNED MONTREAL 1 MARCH 1991 Entry into force: 21 June 1998 Status: 51 signatories, 68 contracting States

8. INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF TERRORIST BOMBINGS New York, 15 December 1997 Entry into force: 23 May 2001, in accordance with article 22 (1).Registration: 23 May 2001, No. 37517.Status: Signatories: 58, Parties: 29

9. INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION AGAINST THE TAKING OF HOSTAGES New York, 17 December 1979 Entry into force: 3 June 1983, in accordance with article 18(1).Registration: 3 June 1983, No. 21931.Status: Signatories: 39, Parties: 96

10. CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF CRIMES AGAINST INTERNATIONALLY PROTECTED PERSONS, INCLUDING DIPLOMATIC AGENTS New York, 14 December 1973 Entry into force: 20 February 1977, in accordance with article 17 (1).Registration: 20 February 1977, No. 15410.Status: Signatories: 25, Parties: 107.

11. INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM New York, 9 December 1999 Not yet in force: (see article 26).Status: Signatories: 57, Parties


The September 11 attacks are crimes pursuant to national and international law and many member states have called for these crimes of terrorism to be brought before the International Criminal Court (ICC). This is not possible because the ICC does not yet exist. It may not be possible to prosecute these crimes through the ICC when it comes into operations because Article 11 of the Rome Statute precludes prosecutions for offences that took place prior to the statute coming into operation. However some legal commentators argue that Article 11 is invalid because it is contrary to the General Assembly resolution #2391 of 26 November 1968 that passed the Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity.

The Rome Statute (The ICC Treaty) is a multi-lateral treaty approved by 120 countries on July 17, 1998 and is the constituent statute for the ICC. (120 voted for, 7 against and 20 abstentions. The US and China were amongst the 7 countries voting against acceptance of the Rome Statute on 17 [sic] July 1998)

The International Criminal Court will begin operation when 60 Countries ratify the Rome Statute. As of October 12 2001 43 countries have ratified and 139 countries have signed the Rome Statute. The US despite significant involvement in the drafting of the Rome Statute is the only Western democracy now opposed. The US Congress recently re-introduced the bill that will ban any kind of cooperation and military assistance with Member States of the UN that have ratified the Rome Statute and obstruct the participation of the US in UN peacekeeping operations. The same bill will authorize the President of the US to use "all the necessary measures" to liberate any US citizens detained by the ICC.

This is in stark contrast to the past US record of support to international criminal courts. The US spearheaded the Nuremberg and Tokyo Tribunals and the creation of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda.

The Rome Statute defines three categories of international crimes committed during violent conflicts between and within states: war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. The Rome Statute also creates the International Criminal Court to be a, "permanent institution and shall have the power to exercise its jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of international concern, as referred to in this [Rome] statute, and shall be complementary to national criminal jurisdictions."(Article 1)

The International Criminal Court will have jurisdiction to prosecute these crimes when the state(s) having jurisdiction are unable or unwilling to do so. Crimes of aggression will eventually be within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.

The US still vigorously opposes the creation of an International Criminal Court. However, the European community vigorously supports the creation of an International Criminal Court with jurisdiction over a broader range of crimes. On 26 September 2001 the Council of Europe parliamentary assembly voted in favour of expanding the mandate of the International Criminal Court to allow it to prosecute perpetrators of terrorist acts. By a nearly unanimous vote (148 to 1 abstention) urged European governments to impose sanctions on countries providing safe haven to terrorists.

The war against Afghanistan also violates the provisions of the Rome Statute war crimes provisions Article 8.

ROME STATUTE article 8.2.b.iv

"Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated;"and 8.2.b.v "Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means, town, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended and which are not military objectives;"and 8.2.b.xxv "Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including willfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions;"


The September 11 attacks in New York were crimes both nationally and internationally. Murder, highjacking, destruction of property are crimes under the national laws of the many countries whose nationals were killed and are crimes pursuant to a wide range of international laws.

The bombing of Afghanistan and the resulting deaths, injuries, starvation and displacement of Afghanistan people and the destruction of property including the destruction of necessary infrastructure is illegal. The use of force to topple to Taliban government is also illegal.

While the rhetoric justifying war raids on Afghanistan (and possibly other countries) suggests there are no laws or law enforcement mechanisms that can respond to the September 11 attacks. That is not true and flies in the face of both international law and it's underlying policies.

When the US entered Germany in 1945, it was not suggested that millions of German civilians be stripped, gassed and bulldozed into mass graves in retaliation for the holocaust. The crimes that had been committed were so enormous that to even think of retaliation in like kind was unimaginably barbaric. Instead the Nuremberg trials were held, setting up the rule of law as the most powerful opponent of rule by military force.

The world community has, through the United Nations and regional agencies worked to "save succeeding generations from the scourge of war" by:

o Prohibiting the use of force as a means of settling international disputes (The Charter); and,

o Developing by global consensus, minimum standards of human rights and international laws that criminalize the crimes most intolerable to the world community including: crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of genocide.

There have been many reminders during the past 50 years of the urgent need to develop laws and to eschew violence as a response to crime. A reminder that the use of force (retaliatory bombing in the following example) contributes to the escalation and not the deterrence of terrorism occurred subsequent to April 1986 when two US servicemen were killed when a bomb exploded in a Berlin nightclub. The US, believing Libyans to be responsible, retaliated by bombing Libya killing 36 civilians including the year old daughter of Libyan leader Moamar Khadafy. Twenty months later, in December 1988 Pan Am flight 103 exploded over Lockerbie Scotland killing 270 people. Three Libyans were subsequently tried by a Scottish Court and located in the Netherlands. Two of the accused were convicted and one was acquitted.

Mechanisms for global enforcement of existing national and international laws exist as evidenced in part by the above mentioned Resolutions directing all members of the United Nations, in the case of the Security Council resolutions, and all NATO members, in the case of the NATO resolutions, to cooperate in the exchange of information and resources to enforce existing laws.

Member states to the UN are obliged to participate in all aspects of a global investigation of the September 11 attacks that would lead to a process of indictment, extradition, prosecution, trial and punishment of those guilty. The cooperative directives from the Security Council also relate to effecting the coordination of measures to prevent future terrorist attacks.

Prosecutions of the perpetrators of the September 11 attacks could take place in the national courts of either the US or a number of other affected states. Alternately, the Security Council can create an ad hoc International Criminal Tribunal on the model of the existing International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia to conduct the global investigation of the September 11 attacks and the resulting prosecutions and trials.

The Security Council has the power to order the creation of an international military force to carry out the requisite investigations. Canadians must insist that all governments adhere to the restraints of law. Citizens must act to ensure that the people of Afghanistan have the security and rights to life provided for by international law and enjoyed by Canadians. Canadians must act to ensure that the people in Afghanistan are afforded legal protections against death injury, starvations, displacement and deprivation of the necessaries of life.

Written by
Gail Davidson a Member of the Law Society of British Columbia and founder of Lawyers' Rights Watch Canada "LAWYERS' RIGHTS WATCH CANADA"
October 13, 2001

Assistance by: Diana Davidson C.M., B.ed, LLB, Founder of People's Law School (editing); Dr. Mark Battersby (Philosophy); (Technical assistance) and Monisha Martins (Research assistance)

"Fascism should rightly be called corporatism as it is a merge of state and corporate power"...Benito Mussolini