Subject: Part-1 Commentary by Offshore DP: Response to: Is Bush Walking Into A Trap?
From: John Hammell
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 14:56:18 -0400

IAHF List: Offshore Dave is one of the smartest people I know. Recently he provided us with serious food for thought as to why the second plane that hit the WTC and the plane that hit the Pentagon weren't shot down by airforce fighter jets. He provided us with hard facts from the air force website and from his former military perspective as a former Navy nuclear reactor operator that prove they certainly COULD have been shot down. Whether you agree with him or not, his views cannot be ignored. I asked him for his opinion of the article I sent out a while back by Robert Fisk titled "Is Bush Walking Into a Trap?"

Dave has made a truly in depth study of current world events, and his insight is penetrating. The numerous quotes by famous people about World Government at the end of his article are particularly thought provoking given current events, but so are all of Dave's views. After reading Dave's views essay, I come away even more convinced than I was before that what is unfolding has been orchestrated to the nth degree and that the Nazi vermin trying to jerk our strings are up to no good.

Clearly, we can trust NOTHING coming out of the mainstream media or the gummint about current events. I await Dave's second installment, in the meantime, read this- and let me know what YOU think of what Dave is saying. Think he's insane in the membrane- a total nut job- one piece short of a loaf? I sure don't, and you won't either after reading this!!

Please forward this to more people. Anyone can be on the IAHF list, sign up at Appreciate this subversive anti gummint info? Kindly send a donation to: IAHF POB 625 Floyd VA 24091 USA or donate electronically via paypal at Your donations will help me to self publish the book re the Codex vitamin issue that I am hard at work on, it will also help me distribute the book and as I said before, to buy the Bass Ale necessary to reach the proper level of inebriation necessary to take the edge off now and then in order to remain as your primary non mainstream news source! (I also run and swim several times per week- and encourage everyone on the IAHF list to exercise daily and get your immune systems into tip top shape. You might use a heart rate monitor see which will encourage you to get the lead out, and to be prepared- for any old thing-because the gummint and their shadow gummint string pullers aint got no use for us "useless eaters."

Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 22:49:48 EDT
Subject: part-1 Response to: Is Bush Walking Into A Trap?:
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 124

Hi John,

I like a lot of this article Is Bush Walking Into A Trap? and Robert Fisk's information may be (or is) entirely correct. But, some of the things that he mentions are matter of perspective. Different perspective or proper prospective? I suppose people must decide for themseves. I have made my decisions.

The Arabs want Jerusalem, and have continually said that there will be no peace until they have it. They have said that there will be no peace, in the Middle East, until all Judeans/"Jews" are dead or driven into the Sea. Make no mistake, this is not about Israel. It is about Jerusalem.

Israel has its own guilt, but much more than just the reasons presented in this article or that others may suspect. As I said, it depends on the perspective. Israel has continued to give away lands, which are not theirs to give away. These lands belong to Yahweh's chosen people (confirmed by a covenant), that He wanted to leave in the possession of these lands. This has not changed and will not change. The "Jews" are violating their part of that covenant, when they acquiesce.

(Note: By the way, the word "Jew" is incorrect. It is a derogatory slang. They are Yehudim/Yahudim, or from the House of Yahudah/Yehudah. Or since the English were so illeterate that they could not pronounce a "y" sound, lets just called them Judeans. Let's compromise with the "lying pen of the scribes, which handles the WORD FALSELY": found in YermeYah 8: 8-9. That would be Jeremiah for all those who insist on that the "J" and "Y" sounds are interchangable.)

Israel/Judah has, in recent years, had some very compromising leadership. They continue to sign Contracts and Treaties with people who are committed to breaking those Treaties, before the ink can dry. I have read books, which document the Arab mindset. From numerous of their own media-broadcast forums, many (not all) of these people believe that anyone who is not of Islam, is an infidel. According to some doctrines (not all), it is taught that infidels are dogs, and it is perfectly OK to lie to an infidel. It follows that breaking a Treaty-agreement with infidels, is perfectly acceptable. So, some of the Islamic nations, cry to the US and UN when Israel does not do what these Arab countries want. Of course, this is usually after the Arabs have violated a contract or peace-accord, themselves. Neither side is inspiring us with honesty, at this point.

During the Six-days War, the Arabs had Israel at their mercy...completely out-gunned and out-numbered. They withdrew because of supernatural intervention. And these Arab countries readily admitted it. If they tried to fire, lock weapons, advance, flank, etc, etc. ... they were met, haulted, or blinded by what "they" (the Arabs) called powerful beings "not of this world". The Israelis did not make these claims, the Arabs did. And the Arabs retreated.

What war in the Middle East has ever lasted six days? Not even America's advanced forces could take out Iraq, in six days. In the Gulf War, America had the advantage over Iraq. In the Six-days War, the Arabs had the advantage over the Israelis, but that did not matter.

The Arabs advance in a different manner. By getting Israel to make concessions and give up territory. This strategy was contemplated, put on paper, and then put into action. This is accomplished with US, UN, Vatican, and world pressure, accompanied with bribe money and economic repercussions (such as the withdrawal of foreign aid.) Of course, if Israel would depend on Yahweh, instead of the US, they wouldn't need the foreign aid. (Scripture: "See Israel, you have destroyed yourself".)

I can understand why much of Islam is upset and I don't hold up the current inhabitants of Israel, as a bastion of righteousness. That goes double for the USA. But from Yahweh's viewpoint, Islam has a bigger problem. Whether, anyone agrees with what I have said or not, they have already forgotten the display of AUTHORITY that was just recently shown to them during the Six-Days War, mentioned herein.

[Note: The Christians and the Americans are in the same boat, so don't think that I am playing favorites. They recognize proper Authority less than the Arabs. All these parties have adopted so much paganism, and they have created doctrines to justify it. And they have gathered to themselves, large numbers of false prophets "to tell them what their itching ears want to hear." --Scriptural Perspective]

At least the Islamic people know the history of the Christian Church/Kirke/Circe, that is why they aren't very interested in hearing it from Americans or Christians. The ARABS know of the 80+ million people that the Christian Church has slaughtered and burned (or tortured on the rack) Also, they have a much better handle on what the IMF and the money-changers are about.

Bill Clinton sent Tomahawk missiles into the Sudan and Afghanistan, and destroyed civilian targets. For example, a pharmaceutical factory, with civilian employees. That's CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES folks. Just like the WTC. The U.S. KILLED THEM The plant cost $27 million. Did the US rebuild it? NO. They claimed that it was producing VX nerve gas, but National Security Advisor: Sam Berger said this on CNN: "We have the physical evidence, but we are not going to produce it."

If you will recall, this attack was done without consulting congress, no media press release, nothing said to the American public... and with NO WARNING to the Sudanese CIVILIANS WHO GOT KILLED. What do you call an attack on CIVILIANS that is delivered WITH NO WARNING???? If it happens in New York City, IT IS CALLED TERRORISM.!!!!

So, it is OK, when the US does it to others, but not when done to the U.S. It is called a "pre-emptive strike" when America sends cruise missiles to KILL ARAB CIVILIANS in the Sudan. But, it is TERRORISM when an ARAB does something with no warning. The U.S. KILLS CIVILIANS, and calls it collateral damage. But, in NYC, people are special. They get called by name. They are not "collateral damage". Is this not the biggest pile of arrogant B-S on the planet, today? It is seriously time for Americans to GET A CLUE.!!

Enough on Perspective for a moment...

The question is about this article in general, and whether or not Bush is walking into a trap. In his article, Fisk assumes this fact: "it has become 'ever more clearer' that the bombing was perpetrated 'to provoke the United States' into a blind, arrogant attack".

[Speaking totally hypothetically.....!!!!]
Why would Mr. Bin Laden to that? Provoke the US? If he hates the US; if he wants the US destroyed;...why would he want to provoke a response that would bring the US onto Afghan soil? And, if provocation is the reason...provocation to do what? To accomplish what? To start a war or holy jihad?

IF this is true, then why stop at just one, four-pronged attack.... on just one day? IF he was trying to strike "fear into" and "provoke" Americans, then why not plan a different set of attacks for the following day? Maybe car-bombs in LA, Chicago, and Philly. Maybe bus explosions in Dallas, Miami, or Houston three days later. How about a suicide car attack, like the ones in Lebanon. Maybe at a shipyard or train depot. Somewhere that people board for cruising the ocean, or traveling, or shipping. How about knocking out some bridges on Interstate Highways? It seems to me, that bin Laden's "provocation" would be more effective, if the American people could not trust any and/or all means of transportion.

I mean if you are starting a war, why would you make one attack, and then wait to see what kind response you muster? Why not guarantee the response, by having more operatives involved and a whole series of attacks? Why not cause bedlam in suburban-neighborhoods? Burn houses, rape or kill the women? How about a post office, UPS, and/or Fedex? Make people not trust the mail. The uni-bomber did it.

And, why not just phone in more threats, from cell phones and pay phones. Use the phone to shut down anything you want with a bomb scare. You know, US General Patton said that "war is hell", so why not make it look like hell. (See, I know that this is inflamatory, AND I AM SPEAKING STRICTLY HYPOTHETICALLY,....... BUT THINK ABOUT WHAT WAR IS...!!)

I keep hearing from the media, that Bin Laden's operatives are "all over this country". One of the men that has been arrested, has been in this country for ten years. What could these people "do and develop"... "plan and plant" within ten years? I mean, these planes attacks were a great provocation, but if you are wanting to provoke a war, why not go all out? Why not try to create such chaos in America, that the people would be screaming for some of these troops to stay home and protect the nation first? I see such a fervor from the "Media-mind-soaked-drones";... that they want their military to go all out after Bin Laden.

And, the media is pumping the poll numbers for all they are worth. Now the media cannot shut up about Anthrax. Why haven't we seen it, yet? What are "the terrorists" waiting on? Tighter security everywhere? I don't think so.

If Bin Laden was attempting to do real damage to the American psyche; if he wanted to provoke a war, then why just a tap on the nose... in just a couple of cities? When you are small and your opponent is big, one strategy is to stick and move. Hit when they least expect it. Keep the opponent disoriented and confused. (I will guarantee that Former CIA director: George Bush, Sr. read THE ART OF WAR by Sun Tsu.)
George H.W. Bush

From what the media is saying about Bin Laden; he supposedly recruited tens of thousands of Islamic operatives (called fanatics), during the Russian-occupation in Afghanistan. The media reports that he has operatives in 60 countries, and they could be your neighbor or your neighborhood store owner. The media reports that these people hate Americans so bad, that they would "strap on hand grenades and blow themselves up" just to take a few Americans out with them.

They report that Bin Laden has vast wealth and resources. Based on the number of operatives that the media and government has reported... coupled with vast resources and money ... and armed with people who are willing to commit suicide for the could keep up the terrorist-style attacks for many, many days.

And why not? Operatives abroad are of no help to Bin Laden, when the US troops hit Afghanistan. They are jamming communications from the area. Since the operatives are expendible anyway, why stop with this carnage on American soil? The last I checked, "vast wealth and resources" would buy numerous molotov cocktails, and America is full of homes that don't have a "neighborhood watch". If these people are what the media and government claims: the most evil and wicked force on the planet today and completely you think that they have not thought of the things that I am saying. I am not giving anyone ideas, that the FBI and CIA have not already thought about. They have been thinking about it for decades. {And, I am only speaking hypothetically, anyway.}

The media has talked of how long it took to plan this WTC attack and how elaborate it was... and they try to convince me that this is all that Bin Laden has got? One day and he's done?? Come on.!!

They keep saying that he has biological weapons technology. Why not put it in the water supply of a major city, and do some real damage? I mean, is this really the claim? Claiming that Bin Laden is the bigger war-monger than the US. Please, his numbers don't even come close. How many people have died in almost ten years of economic sanctions against Hussein? STARVATION is one of the most cruel deaths imaginable.

This WTC attack may have struck a little fear, but I am seeing that start to dissipate, and now everyone is just pissed. Why just provoke America?

My point is this: I DON'T GET IT!!

And I will say this: if this is all that Bin Laden has know, killing 6000 people and knocking down a couple of buildings ... then this is going to be a short war. The US killed an average of 1500 Iraqi soldiers per day during the Gulf War (not including innocent civilians). For a sustained period of 100 days. But, the figure is misleading, because when the US really got going; they knocked off between 50,000 to 100,000 in four short days.

With 150+ attack planes on the way (note that they said in today paper that they already know what their targets are: HOW?), aircraft carriers and cruise missile destoyers, every branch of military with new and improved super-weapons, with ground forces armed to the teeth, with the Afghan people already bugging out... the US ought to mop this one up in 1/4 of the time it took in Kuwait. And I don't care if they hide in their mountains, the US has the technology now, to know where they are. The US has had satellites trained on Afghanistan for over 15 years. Some of these mountains (that everyone is claiming that Bin Laden will hide in)... we can just knock down and let the weight of the rubble do the rest.

As I said... I DON'T GET IT..!!!

[Let's take a breather..... and shift perspective, again]

I say all of this facitiously, because I DO GET IT.

John, I have always appreciated your tenacity, and I appreciate that you have asked my opinion of this Fisk article. I am not trying to belittle him and I respect a lot of what he has said in this article. He does report a lot of truth. [And, just to let you know, I am not trying to be verbose and just spout off my mouth. I have considered my responses to your inquiry for over seven days and determined that my response could make a point about (proper) PERSPECTIVE.]

I have lived outside the U.S.A., and because of that I have an appreciation of why other nations and ethinc groups, have such a poor opinion of this country. Some of it is justified and some not.

But, this too, is just part of "their" plan. "They" have a need for America to be hated, so the attitude is fostered and events happen that continue to foster this hatred. Also, they have a need for Americans to not understand why. Why other nations would attack the US, is almost unfathomable to Americans. This "VIEW" is also necessary. The American people see themselves as the world's "moral authority" and therefore their government as the "world's police"(policy enforcement arm). This attitude is necessary. The idea has been fostered and continues to be fostered, to the point that other nation's are now saying it, openly. I have heard it, since the planes hit the WTC: "We need America to be the World's Police". But, all of this is the way that "they" need it to be. Whatever happens in the future, from here on, it will be because "they" need it to be that way. It is necessary. It is the desired result.

So, my answer to the question (in the article) is this: Bush and the Illuminati, and all the other cohorts, ... "they" know exactly what "they" are doing. It is like reading from a script. They have been planning world events for a very long time. This airplane attack in NYC and DC is nothing. "They" have actually been planninng 3 World Wars since 1857.

Oh, every once in a while they hit a snag. But, the UN's own internal letters and memos, among their "elite" (like Ted Turner) indicate that this event in New York is nothing.

"They" study human narture constantly and "they", in fact, help to control it... through their programming (they call radio/TV-shows, "programs or programming" with good reason). In the words of Ted Turner (one of the "elite"), the ideal population of the Earth is 350 million. This means that these "elite" (or "they") look at the "rest of us" as a drain on world-resources. "Their" world-resources. See: The Georgia Guidestones

"Their" religious and philosophical beliefs, are tied to Sun-worship and the precession of the Ages. To the "Born-Again" Phoenix that rises from the ash; and to "their" motto "ORDO AB CHAO". If "they" tear something down, its no big deal... "they" will just get the slaves to rebuild it for them. If we "knock off" 2/3 of the population of Afghanistan, Iraq, the US, so what... It's just the dawning of a New Age or New Era.

A friend of mine called to tell me that the media caught Chuck Schumer on tape, dancing after the WTC event. Why would he do that? Because he is one of these elite (or "they"). My friend said that one of the other Senators, walked up and told Mr. Schumer to "cool it" because the "cameras were on him". I don't know if this is true, because I did not see it.

But... based on what I know for fact, based on how fast I see them moving to start a war, based on how fast they pointed at Bin Laden without conclusive evidence (which they still do not have), based on how they are defining their agenda (i.e. "ridding the world of all evildoers"???, please); I would say that "they" are proceeding chapter and verse from their "WE ARE THE (ONE)-WORLD" handbook.

Bush is not being lured into anything. He knows exactly what he is doing. He knew exactly the average Americans response to all the events. He knew how many ships and planes he was going to deploy. "They" knew and "they" controlled the hearts and minds of the masses of people. "They" have done a masterful job of that for many decades, now. "They" or he(Bush) have not been surprised by what happened and the people's responses to it.

Also, "they" knew that people like you and I, would raise questions. "They" know our nature and our responses, because they have studied us (and others like us). "They" knew the percentages; those who would support, those who would object, those who would question, those who would inform and report, those who would cower in the corner. "They" knew the economic repercussions. "They" knew "how much this would cost". "They" have to know ..."They" have a much larger agenda.

The only trap, here, is the one to trap the masses. These people are POLITICIANS. The word means POLICY-MAKER, not Law-Maker. Once you make policy, you have to "police" it. So, therefore, you send out "Policy-Enforcement". (ie. troops, false prophets and false reporters, etc.) to ensure the policy-position. And, "they" are doing so even now.

In the words of one "their" most famous idols and icons; the "ever-so-popular-American-Fabius": Franklin Deleanor Roosevelt: (he said;


I want to get to my REAL OPINION? Let's get to the REAL POINT.

John, you and I write the way we do and talk the way we do, because we share a common frustration. It is the same frustration that our Messiah: Yahshua had. He was very eloquent in the assessment, when he told the people and the elite(scribes): "When evening comes and you say, 'It will be fair weather for the sky is red.' Yet, you cannot discern (determine) the signs of the times?!?!" You and I ask this question all the time. We bleed our hearts out, trying to "make" others understand. But, most do not. And, this too is necessary.

For the sake of "NECESSITY", I am going to finish this with some very significant signs, just to make sure that I am true to my own nature and what Yahweh would have me do. It is my job, before my Father, to give the "weather report" about the times. It does not matter that most will not learn or try to discern. It is enough that we have done our best. We plant the seed, and we water,... we do not determine what kind of soil it lands on. Only the individual can determine if he/she will be furtile soil. And only the Sovereign: Yahweh can make a seed grow.

These signs are going to simply be quotes from the "Leadership" from around the world and in the US. And, quotes from other prominant persons. This will span decades and centuries. In other words, I am going to (once again) print, what "THEY" have been saying for a long time. But, I have a DISCLAIMER to make, first. DISCLAIMER: If a person has no eyes to see, or ears to hear; that person should stop now reading now, delete this message, and go turn on Ted Koppel.

It's my nature to question, so look for Q., after some of these quotes.
Here are the signs:

"Give me control of a nation's currency, and I care not who makes it laws." ----- Baron M. A. Rothschild
(Q. Why did he say this? If you can control the monetary system of a country, are not the lawmakers at your mercy?)

"It is not well enough that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be revolution before tomorrow morning."
-- Henry Ford, founder of Ford Motor Company
(Q. Why don't the people understand? Did Henry know something that most do not? Revolution, he said?)

"We have the best politicians that money can buy."
-- Will Rogers
(Q. But, whose money paid the politicians? Who are the politicians loyal to?)

"It is easy to understand why the law is used by the legislator/(politician), to destroy in varying degrees among the rest of the people;...their personal independence by slavery, their liberty by oppression, and their property by plunder. This is done for the benefit of the person/(politician) who makes the law, and in proportion to the power that he holds."
-- THE LAW by Frederick Bastiat
(Q. Do the politicians not pass laws, that they exempt themselves from? How is it that some go into office poor, and come out rich? Sometimes, these politicians spend 20-60 million dollars of their own money, for a job that pays $150-$250K per year, just to be a Senator? Why?)

"In the United States we have, in effect, two governments... We have the duly constituted Government... Then we have an independent, uncontrolled and uncoordinated government in the Federal Reserve System, operating the money powers which are reserved to the Congress.."
-- Congressman Wright Patman, Chairman: House Banking and Currency Committee
(Q. Two Governments, huh?)

"This Act (the Federal Reserve Act) establishes the most gigantic trust on EARTH. When the President signs this Act the invisible government of the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust Investigation, will be legalized. The new law will create inflation whenever the trust's want inflation. From now on depressions will be scientifically created."
-- Congressman Charles A. Lindberg, Sr.
(Q. The power to create Depression and/or Recessions? Invisible Government? Legalized? You ever notice how "legal" and "moral" are not the same thing?)

"I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the past 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election...It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States." Senator
-- George W. Malone (1962)
(Revolution, again?)

"The best way to destroy the capitalist system is to debauch the currency."
-- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, aka Lenin

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already "they" have raised up a money aristocracy that has set the government at defiance"
-- Thomas Jefferson (1787)
(Q. Wow 1787, this didn't just start did it?)

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent".
-- James Paul Warburg:
son of Paul M. Warburg: Founder of the Federal Reserve System boasting before the US Senate on Feb. 17, 1950.
(Q. Conquest or consent? In America it looks like consent is the choice, don't you think?)

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes."
-- Felix F. Frankfurter, US Supreme Court Justice
(Q. Invisible, again?)

"The real menace to our Republic is the invisible government which, like a giant octopus, sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation."
-- John F. Hylan, Mayor of New York (1925)
(Q. What are these people seeing that most do not see? Something that operates invisibly? Is this a plot or just an accident?)

"My vision of a New World Order foresees a UN with a revitalized peacekeeping function. It is the sacred principles enshrined in the UN charter to which we henceforth pledge our allegiance."
(Q. Sacred Principles in the UN charter? Have you read these "sacred principle" to which your former PREZ henceforth pledged your allegiance? Who is "we"?)

"To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men, their individualism, loyalty to family traidtions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas."
-- Brock Chisolm, UN Director: World Health Organization

"Fundamental Bible-believing people do not have the right to indoctrinate their children in their religious beliefs because we, the State, are preparing them for the year 2000, when America will be part of a one-world global society and their children will not fit in."
-- Peter Hoagland, Nebraska Senator on radio (1983)
(Q. Are "they" not building their "world coalition" now? To stop "world terrorism"? Wait until you see the final definition of what a terrorist is..!!! Think that "they" won't put a stop to an email like this one?)

"The technetronic era, involves the GRADUAL appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite; unrestrained by traditional values." -- from the book Between Two Ages
-- Zbigniew Brzezinski: National Security Advisor to Jimmy Carter
(Q. More controlled? Dominated? Unrestrained?)

"The age of nations must end. The government of nations have decided to order their seperate sovereignties into one government, to which they will surrender their arms."
-- THE UN WORLD CONSTITUTION (Well, there is a small part of the charter.
Q. When did the US and these nations decide this? And why was not it in the papers?)

"The UN is the greatest fraud in history. Its purpose is to destroy the United States."
-- Congressman John Rankin
(Q. He's probably lying, right? Just a Fear-monger, right?)

"We must get the New World Order on track and bring the UN into its correct role in regards to the United States'".
-- Warren Christopher: SECRETary of State under Bill Clinton --on CNN Jan. 25, 1993
(Q. What role is that, Mr Christopher?)

"Today, Americans would be outraged if UN forces entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful."
-- Henry Kissinger: Bilderberger meeting: 1992
(Q. Why would the US need UN forces? What is going to happen to "make Americans grateful"? Was this a warning? Create the problem then give the masses the solution? Is the media talking about bio-war? Hmmmm.)

"Gentleman, Comrades, do not be concerned about all you hear about glasnost and perestroika and democracy in the coming years. These are primarily for outward consumption. There will be no significant internal change within the Soviet Union, other than for cosmetic purposes. Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep."
-- Mikhail Gorbachev: Address to Soviet Politburo (1987)
(Q. I thought Russia was not a threat? Reagan neutralized them, right? And, of course, Russia took its nukes off-line during that process, right?)

"The New World Order under the UN will reduce everything to one common denominator. The system will be made up of a single currency, single centrally financed government, single tax system, single language, single political system, single world court of justice, single state religion... Each person will have a registered number, without which he will not be able to buy of sell; and there will be one universal church. Anyone who refuses to take part in this universal system will have no right to exist."
-- Dr. Kurk E. Koch, a university professor who has lectured at over 100 universities in 65 countries.
(Q. Get the minds while they are young, right professor? The word "catholic" means "universal"- Webster's Is this hidden?)

"Does it not seem strange to you that these men just happened to be CFR, and just happened to be on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve that absolutely controls the money and interest rates of this great country without benefit of Congress? The Federal Reserve is a privately owned organization, which has absolutely nothing to do with the United States of America."
--- book: With no Apologies, Sen. Barry Goldwater

"The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common-- they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members of the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power that ends up in control of global government."
-- Rear Admiral Chester Ward, former CFR member 16 years

"The ultimate aim of the CFR is to create a one-world socialist system and make the U.S. an official part of it."
-- Dan Smoot, former staff member of FBI Headquarters

"I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by the gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations."
-- James Madison
(Q. Gradual encroachments?)

"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."
-- Norman Thomas: US Socialist Party Presidential Candidate.

"The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England and believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established."
-- book Tragedy and Hope - Carroll Quigley: Professor Georgetown University, CFR member and mentor of Bill Clinton

"The truth is stranger than fiction. Fiction, after all, at least has to make sense."
-- Mark Twain

"The CFR is dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax exempt foundation (i.e. Rockefeller), and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education, and mass communication media, that it should be familiar to every American concerned with good government and with preserving and defending the US Constitution and our free-enterprise system. Yet, the nation's right-to-know machinery, the news media; usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities. The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the US from a sovereign Republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship."
-- Congressman John R. Rarick

"We operate here under directives which emulate from the White House ... The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to alter life in the US so that we can be merged with the Soviet Union."
-- Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation

"The time will come when they will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit ......Cont. part 2