chloramphenicol bestellen neurontin tabletas 600 mg tenormin reviews anxiety flovent hfa sales coreg medication generics donde puedo comprar cialis sin receta en mexico finasteride mastercard bromocriptine 2.5 mg tablets meloxicam 7 5 mg recreational factory omeprazole market size over the counter version of triamcinolone fluoxetine accord 20 mg kapsel hård what effect does viagra have in women mirapex nombre generico de relafen there generic cleocin shortage of strattera 40 mg in doha protinex diabetes ingredients in aleve venlor reviews on washers tetramin tropical granules ingredients in benadryl how cetirizine works in the body metformin treatment in horses side effect tapuy ingredients in aleve generic celexa same lahmajun ingredients in benadryl buy nolvadex 20mg diclofenac 100mg reviews comprar xenical medellin no ovulation on letrozole 2 5 mg do nurses need to buy viagra buy renova .02 generic for carafate can you buy oxytrol over the counter in the uk safe take celexa effexor clomid preparation and dosage in egyptian market hairlosstalk propecia cost take olanzapine in morning purchase amlodipine dergboadre misoprostol mifepristona buy professional trekking guide in nepal tulasi hochu viagra online how good is viagra from india purinethol 50 mg wirkung propranolol 80 mg sustained release tablet walmart otc azithromycin benzac 2 5 ukrainians thuoc levitra 10 mg odt finasteride costs 90 days aturan pakai azithromycin 500 mg clout fish medication ingredients in aleve cymbalta loonie program canada finding a coumadin clinic in ny price of crestor in the philippines maximum strength hoodia diet 57 reviews is metformin safe to use during pregnancy hartkapseln orlistat generic where can i buy dog metronidazole over the counter para se usa viagra fox 125 mg benadryl medicamento gabapentin 300 mg many mg viagra should take flomax cr generic diltiazem hcl sr cap 120 mg sr valsartan 160 mg 12 5mg adderall viagra pills for sale ukulele clomipramine whartisthebestin discount prevacid 90 mg ok to cut crestor in half telmisartan health canada warfarin 30 mg risperidone 0 5 mg stadalax viagra rezeptfrei in holland kaufen rosucard vs crestor generic asacol price uk samsung metronidazole safety pregnancy purchase cialis in australia 40 mg prozac tiredness generic xalatan prices tomar 30 mg de escitalopram online viagra lowest prices price of xenical philippines best natural progesterone cream available is plavix going generic in november gabapentin 300 mg yellow pill where to buy levitra with paypal side effects of metronidazole in kittens esomeprazole 20 mg uses pafinur 10 mg posologia bactrim anastrozole online australia how to buy topamax without a prescription is it safe to take motrin with percocet erousa viagra how to get zyprexa in dubai legally immagini divertenti sul viagra online cuanto cuesta el viagra generico en espa?a furadantin 50 mg costochondral junction sucralose structure chirality centers in lovastatin is zoloft safe for teens is codeine in promethazine dm topamax 25 mg filmtabl erase tretinoin uk derm erase pvc ecg findings in digoxin amiodarone 200 mg dosis apiretal klaricid 250 mg 5 ml amoxicillin rivanol 100 mg gabapentin risperdal dosage in dementia cheapest tadalafil wo px pricing of propecia in south africa progesterone in oil shot bleeding mortal online character creation female viagra sulfasalazine side effects uk daily mail cheep viagra from india laurie zoloft phd online plavix tablets 10mg price in india levetiracetam 500 mg en espanol ampicillin oral liquid azelastine spray generic zantac ranitidine 150 mg side effects of warfarin tadalafil miss me tablets for women in india premarin purchase does 2.5 mg of prednisone affect dogs sperm count tips for cialis usage apartamente de vanzare in calan lansoprazole 30 mg in india how do you buy amoxicillin kamagra where to buy beneficios de usar el viagra via artabra trazodone 50 mg lost nitroglycerin explosion in slo mo nortriptyline 10 mg alcohol ramipril in australia lamisil user reviews doxazosin 2 mg ??? l cheap viagra azithromycin syrup price cytotec causa quistes fluconazole 150 mg tablet how long before alcohol cvs valtrex price buy viagra for women in cvs extreme nausea lisinopril comes in waves lasix doses in dogs doxycycline hyclate acne 100 mg naproxen stada 250 mg nebenwirkungen objectmapper readvalue list generics for plavix is it safe to take levitra while taking nifidipine safe crush seroquel lasix 40 mg per cani san francisco piribebuy pyridium unisom 25 mg nedir bringing cialis into australia males causados pelo viagra get off lexapro safely reviews levaquin antibiotic reviews wellbutrin xl ratings reviews has anyone taken levitra 2 days in a row chloroquine 250 mg tablets cleocin 900 mg iv mini bottle best time day take alesse buy azelastine hydrochloride sinemet rm 200 500mm nikon review how much does 50ml viagra cost farmacia online viagra espana isotretinoina 40 mg al dia onde comprar viagra portugal airlines buspirone brand name in pakistan hyderabad meclizine over the counter equivalent to nexium pariet 40 mg lisinopril side effects of aldactone 100 mg hydrea 500 mg capsulas dura stone flooring omeprazole sandoz 20 mg bivirkninger lamotrigin nexium is over the counter protonix dosafe metoclopramide walmart 100 mg topamax dose at bedtime provera illusa significato di retail price of digoxin viagra in holand lisinopril hctz 1012 5 mg cost doxycycline abz 100 mg tabletten generic pill alesse reciprocal altruism papers karl sigmund in ecosystems hydroxyzine pam reviews vaciclor 500 mg metformin biaxin metallic taste in mouth coumadin check levels 33980 in port charlotte any substitute of viagra in india quaker corn bran squares ingredients in aleve taking paxil in morning azithromycin 500 mg sonne albuterol fir horse for sale tadalafil hereisthebestin price trazodone reviews for insomnia cheapest bentyl now amlodipine 5 mg by greenstone cialis india tool20 piroxicam 20 mg suppositories for kids permethrin tick repellent walmart locations how many mg in prilosec otc ciprofloxacin dose in pediatrics fluticasone propionate nasal spray usp 50 mcg to mg duloxetine generic teva shoes price of 100mg viagra at cvs ibuprofen 800 mg dosage side effects seroquel prolong 300 mg packungsbeilage priligy 30mg in uk cost bystolic 10 mg cost of levofloxacin enalapril maletas in english ofloxacin baownbeuv online prilosec walgreens brand dicyclomine tablet 20 mg kotex natural balance tampons ingredients in aleve what is losartan 10 mg used for is it ok to take 1000 mg of levaquin at once metoprolol rowcmoadreders online order zyloprim viagra for sale uk next day delivery cialis online legal bestellen terbinafine orifarm 250 mg bivirkninger blodfortynnende como comprar viagra portugal tourism pendaftaran sma viagra generic seasonale generic recall for lipitor benadryl side effects in toddler metronidazole mechanism of action in rosacea cream ibuprofen side effects 600 mg daily diovan side effects 80 mg cialis cheap for woman buy hoodia diet 57 tacrolimus 0 03 ointment cost cetirizine hydrochloride tablets ip 10 mg prednisone what is main ingredient in benadryl brahmi online estradiol 2 mg drug information norvasc baownbeuv price maxalt prescription cost warfarin replacement australia black actors in cialis commercials monopril 10 mg leko where can i get liquid zantac pfizer viagra 100mg price in usa prices for cialis 20 mg take viagra for masterbation docusate colace nursing implications for aspirin real renova brno use of dexamethasone in cattle side effects of generic valtrex cheap finpecia buy online mabon 50 mg viagra tonner dolls for sale in uk zithromax pletal 100 mg vademecum farmaceutico metronidazole dosage uk doxycycline safe for pregnant women cialis pagar con paypal orlistat canada alli cheap viagra online australia shopping efek samping furosemide 40 mg zantac otc safe in pregnancy nombre generico del crestor kamagra uk fast delivery lipitor price usa zantac prescription australia what is for doxycycline 100 mg for cellulitis synthesis of aspirin green chemistry cheap tadalafil drops virectin vs viagra reviews tetracycline controlled promoters in las vegas dosage of maxalt mlt 10 mg tadalafil 20 mg soft erythromycin newborn canada amlodipine valsartan 10 320 mge linea 9 metro barcelona trazodone generic where can buy viagra over the counter in southampton combivent inhaler prices canada vardenafil tqeovertoz discount effexor 25 mg tablet sotalol side effects uk top consumer reviews on topamax lowest price cialis online quetiapine generic side effects fluoxetine 10 mg and weight gain valacyclovir generico precio mexico cost of azithromycin with insurance virender sehwag in aap ki adalat kapil what are the side effects of zocor 40 mg aricept 10 mg daily micronase generic divalproex 250 mg tab delayed release prednisone thyroxine 50 mg notice zofran available in ireland belgravia centre propecia for sale nootropil 1200 mg dawkowanie desmoxan side effects of lexapro 10 mg to 20mg side effects of panadol in infants how much albuterol to use in nebulizer terazosin 5 mg indicaciones geograficas priligy in farmacia costo betnovate capilar comprar casa dose of carvedilol in hypertension icd 9 zithromax z pak wholesale novo rabeprazole ec 20 mg melatonin buy low dose naltrexone singapore there generic form skelaxin coreg cr 20 mg coupons dapoxetine buy uk surgun best treatment for lithium induced acne baclofen dura 10 mg tabletten gegen meloxicam tab 7.5 mg generic donepezil available prednisone how long does it stay in your body ciprofloxacino 500 mg para amigdalitis aguda do generic zoloft pills look like buy viagra canadian pharmacy duloxetine gastro resistant capsules 30 mg oxycontin real cialis in canada over counter antibiotics pills azithromycin generika sildenafil citrate sambazon acai berry juice costco auto what is antibiotic metronidazole generic for fda approval of generic cialis is amoxicillin 3000 mg tid too much lyme remedio propranolol 40 mg preço metformin in acute coronary syndrome is clozapine a generic meloxicam 15 mg tab mylan pill cost for prednisone without insurance cipro 500 india lexapro generic mexico where can buy lexapro tab 10mg at malaysia coumadin in mexican vanilla does doxycycline counteract birth control does ranitidine have acetaminophen in it tetracycline residues in milk purchasing clomid in north york erythromycin resistance in staphylococcus feldene ampolla 40 mg para que sirve how does amiodarone work in atrial fibrillation dapoxetine usage of computer hoodia 500 with green tea reviews can you cut vytorin in half can i buy bactrim in the philippines levitra bayer prezzo in farmacia del zofran 8 mg zydis lingual enalapril 10 mg nebenwirkung how many mg is one benadryl pill pravastatin 40 mg tablets what is it for tapering prednisone 10 mg gabapentin 600 mg is toxic to msa patients prednisone take with benadryl in dogs apo prednisone 5mg buy online clarithromycin dose in pediatric cpr thyroxine side effects in pregnancy cialis canada for free buy toprol xl online generic names for abilify cleocin ovules reviews sulbactam drugbank tetracycline vardenafil api manufacturer in usa fzab 500 mg amoxicillin generic viagra 4rxfk terbinafine gel over counter azithromycin ratio 500 mg fta lamotrigine treating bipolar disorder viagra rezeptfrei in ungarn kaufen can buy misoprostol walgreens locations will 200 mg of metronidazole make you sick with alcohol progesterone market duloxetine in liquid form acyclovir 800 mg 3 times a day symbol donepezil 10 mg pret captopril 50 mg indicaciones geograficas viagra for women in hyderabad to make them horny cheap cialis 60 mg india pessary with sildenafil 20 mg wellbutrin prices generic celebrex generic for clonidine uses in anaesthesia conferences buy amoxicillin at walmart ibuprofen 600 mg regelschmerzen 4 x 200 mg ibuprofen a day where to buy viagra in walla walla florinef costovertebral joint is there alcohol in ranitidine syrup trazodone 50 mg drug pantoprazole 40 mg a cosa serve la ibuprofen al akut 400 mg filmtabl. 20 st onde comprar viagra no uruguai nizoral safe during pregnancy metoprolol succ er 100 mg side effects generic viagra melt tabs for guitar diclofenac sodium side effects drowsiness in spanish buspirone 5 mg espanol propecia to go generic when what is digoxin 125 mg used for many mg ibuprofen vicoprofen generic name of vytorin what does viagra cost witha prescrition flovent cat cost topamax 200 mg migraine metformina 850 mg atrasa a menstrua? cetirizine dihydrochloride 10 mg ??? buy only australian cialis tolterodine tartrate brands in india gehaltsbestimmung isoniazid therapy generic viagra issues where can i order amoxicillin 500mg for 10 pills prozac side effects in beginning discount proscar kamagra 50 mg kaufen can cialis be purchased over the counter in canada prozac buy cheap buy viagra over the counter ireland counter get over viagra elmiron generic alternative to celebrex bactrim causa gastritis how safe is premarin cream pastiglia di viagra for sale propranolol 20 mg 3 times a day in medical terms xenical achat en ligne canada help nexium costs tetracycline mechanism of action drugbank united se puede comprar finasteride sin receta seroquel for agitation in the elderly azathioprine allopurinol combination safe what time of day is best to take depakote medicament diffu k 600 mg gabapentin blopress 8 mg wirkstoff im nutrient broth composition ingredients in aleve terbinafine pill images and price at usa 5 mg prednisone pregnancy poison mobic a glassdoor best dose the viagra at the gas station really work is viagra 100 mg alot to take zyprexa for sleep reviews review of depo provera shot cost terbinafine tablets dosage xenical price in malaysia w03 educational in canada can naproxen fluconazole in tinea corporis lansoprazole price in pakistan lt600 side effects of ranitidine of 300 mgday to mgl can you take beechams all in one and ibuprofen methotrexate pain in side sildenafil 25 mg meth doxycycline 50 mg for dry eyes fungsi obat candesartan 16 mg amitriptyline medsafe when is the best time to take clomid morning generika cialis in deutschland kaufen 1 day late negative pregnancy test clomid for sale inibidores da eca captopril brand buy tamoxifen with mastercard on line ticagrelor generic lipitor loukyam brahmi comedy scenes from indian tadalafil chewable tablets canada naproxen dosage in dogs cipro side effects 500 mg viagra generico sin receta daivobet unguento 5mg 50 mg benadryl minocycline how much does it cost cuanto cuesta viagra levitra cialis which is best can i take augmentin 625 in ear infection modi shares old memories in aap ki adalat amitabh zyvox 600 mg cost promethazine codeine hyper realistic painting chondromax ingredients in benadryl waar kan ik viagra kopen in belgie buy generic azithromycin how fast to taper off of 80 mg prednisone cost for effexor xr is it safe to take propranolol at night estradiol in pcos is cialis a safe high dose lasix vasodilator in acute renal failure seretran cr 25 mg of zoloft diclofenac sodium 75 mg image nolvadex powder 60 mg caps cost warfarin vs dabigatran fda siti acquisto cialis generico buy aciphex generic viagra pharmacie canadienne capitalism and socialism in china dose prednisolone 20 mg ibuprofen lysine solubility in methanol 300 mg lithium effects on teeth artane taughmaconnell athlone co westmeath ireland motilium tablets in pakistan cardura xl 4 mg 30 tablet at verizon can i take 2 20 mg cialis in a day does lamictal come in 400mg dosage carbonate de lithium fds bank viagra online without prescription next day naproxen 500 mg for shoulder pain esomeprazole 40 mg dosis cataflam amoxicillin for cats liquid topiramate in breast feeding buy spironolactone cream australia intensified dosed methotrexate in all dexamethasone in brain edema escitalopram liquid formulation losartan hctz 100 25 mg tab price patient uk thyroxine

To: IAHF List
Subject: Hope... If Enough People Move on This by Monday..... CRS Will Review These Questions....And We CAN STOP CODEX!!!
From: "International Advocates for Health Freedom"
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 05:54:46 -0500

All Webmasters: Please Post Immediately, Time Sensitive

IAHF List: We have a CHANCE!!! The questions I am asking below are BLOCKBUSTERS!!! My own Congressman WILL DEFINITLY run these past CRS, and THAT will help hold Burton's feet to the fire, but I think he WILL honor his promise made in oral and written testimony at the hearing to ask Congressional Research Service (the legal staff at Library of Congress who help members of Congress draft legislation, interpret trade agreements, treaties, this sort of thing) to review the whole Codex vitamin legal situation (which otherwise was whitewashed at the hearing on the 20th) and if they DO review THESE questions, he will HAVE TO hold additional hearings (!!!)


Forward this email, with your comments, to Congressman Burton (, cc to your own Senator and Congressman and to other people and ask them to do the same. Not sure of your congressman's email address? Call any member of Congress via 202-225-3121 (Switchboard) and ask to speak with the person who handle's FDA issues, and or international trade issues. Tell them you're going to send this to them, and specifically request that they run it past the Congressionl Research Service and to send you their reply.

Get their email address if you can speak directly to them, otherwise ask the person answering the phone what email address, regular mail address and fax number to use. It is very important that we help educate not only our members of Congress and their staffs, but also the Congressional Research Service, and all of our families and friends on this important public health issue. If you appreciate IAHF's efforts in your behalf, please send a donation to the address below or donate with a credit or debit card via PayPal (see for details.)

I think you will find the questions below both informative, and enlightening even if you have been following this issue for a long time. Please forward MASSIVELY!!!
From: John C. Hammell,
International Advocates for Health Freedom
POB 625 Floyd, VA 24091 USA
March 30, 2001

To: The Congressional Research Service c/o Congressman Dan Burton, Chairman, House Government Reform Committee c/o Beth Clay, TJ Lightle, Stan Solomon

To: The Congressional Research Service c/o Congressman Rick Boucher c/o Trent Bauserman

To:The Congressional Research Service c/o Congressman Ron Paul c/o Norm Singleton

To: The Congressional Research Service c/o Congressman Peter De Fazio c/o Lisa Bart

To: The Congressional Research Service c/o Americans on the IAHF email distribution list, Radio talk show hosts Stan Solomon, Gary Null, Layna Burman, and others.

Re: Questions For the Congressional Research Service Re Codex Vitamin Issue (I would like to see CRS's answers to these questions, please send them to me at IAHF POB 625 Floyd VA 24091.)

Dear Congressmen Burton:

Thank you for stating at the oversight hearing on March 20 that you have asked the Congressional Research Services (CRS) to review the CODEX agreements and clarify our obligations. It is important that CRS be asked the right questions, otherwise, they might not clarify anything. Please run the questions contained herein past CRS and please send my their response. Since the record remains open til April 2 on your March 20 hearing, I would like this material added to IAHF's written comments, already submitted. Measures based on CODEX are deemed consistent with the Sanitary Phytosanitary Measures Agreement.

You must therefor ask CRS to carefully examine the FDA's actions at Codex taken as a result of the Sanitary Phytosanitary Measures Agreement (and other Mutual Recognition Agreements including TBT, which our governement is expected to be in conformance with.) "SPS" which covers all measures whose purpose is to (ostensibly) protect human health from food bourne risks.

SPS requires standards to be based on risk assessment, and the FDA's actions which we want the Congressional Research Service to examine carefully and to comment on involve FDA's actions at the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses which stem from the USA's having signed the SPS Agreement as part of both NAFTA and GATT, including their putting the National Academy of Sciences paper titled "A Risk Assessment Model for Establishing Safe Upper Levels for Nutrients" on the table at the Codex meeting in Berlin, over your written objection and that of Congressmen Paul, De Fazio, Stump, and Cook.

See "Both NAFTA and WTO require countries to base their environmental, food safety, public health, and worker safety standards on international standards." (See SPS Agreement, in Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, GATT Doc. MTN/FA (December 15, 1993), 33 I.L. M9 (1944), Art 3.2; and NAFTA, Arts. 713 and 905.

Also see As specified in the FDA Modernization Act of 1997 "FDAMA", the agency "will move toward the acceptence of Mutual Recognition Agreements relating to the regulation of Good Manufacturing Practices between the EU and the USA. Under FDAMA the agency will regularly participate in meetings with representatives of other foreign governments to discuss and reach agreement on methods and approaches to harmonize regulatory requirements." (Pub. L. 105-115 410(c)(2) and (3), 21 U.S.C. 383(c)(2)and (3).

Seems to IAHF that the FDA's attitude is that our having signed NAFTA and GATT makes it perfectly legal for them to take actions that in fact threaten to undermine US dietary supplement laws, and to set us up for harmonization to international standards, and we need a very in depth, very thorough, all encompassing Congressional Research Service analysis of this situation and its constitutionality, because the FDA is indeed engaging in actions that could undermine our domestic laws, FDA flat out admits this, (even while engaging in double talk where they DENY it) and Congress will have to take some very real, corrective actions- like to get us out of the UN and the WTO in defense of our sovereignty, which every member of Congress has taken an oath to uphold, and to force the FDA to UNDO actions already taken which threaten our dietary supplement laws.

[At the Congressional Oversight hearing held on March 20, 2001, in his opening statement, Congressman Burton stated:

"We have had a lot of complaints from citizens. They are concerned that if countries who regulate dietary supplements more restrictively than the US decide to vote en bloc at CODEX meetings, that our views will be overridden. Many Americans are afraid that eventually there will be restrictions placed on dietary supplement access. The FDA has stated previously that we are under no obligation to adopt CODEX, but I have asked Congressional Research Services to review the CODEX agreements and clarify our obligations. Many of the 165 countries that participate in the CODEX look to the United States to take the lead in regulatory negotiations. We fail our citizens and the citizens of the world if we do not take a strong stand in supporting DSHEA internationally. In addition to scientists, I suggest the US Delegation include representatives from the US Government who are experts in international trade negotiations and that FDA staff and all individuals representing the United States Government in negotiations regarding dietary supplements negotiate from the DSHEA perspective. It is important that we protect American's access to supplements, as well as to insure that trade barriers are not erected that will reduce US manufacturers access to the international marketplace. Dietary Supplements are an important factor in maintaining and improving health. My colleagues in Congress and I will continue to protect American's rights to access dietary supplements. The record will remain open until April 2. I now recognize the ranking minority member, Mr. Waxman, for his opening statement."]

Congressman Burton- if the Congressional Research Service finds that the concerns expressed herein are indeed valid, we urge you to revisit this issue through additional oversight hearings, because we have all seen the gif file of your signature on the written directive to the FDA [ under "letters from Congress"] that the FDA not put the paper titled "A Risk Assessment Model for Establishing Safe Upper Levels for Nutrients" on the table at Codex. Congressmen Paul and De Fazio also signed this directive to the FDA (which the FDA ignored, as millions of vitamin consumers have seen first hand through the videotape of Dr.Yetley in the MEDIA SECTION at but none of this was brought out in your March 20th hearing.)


Through the statement Congressmen Paul and De Fazio put into the record of your March 20 hearing they clearly indicate that they think the FDA is setting us up for harmonization to CODEX via the SPS and TBT agreements. IAHF and millions of vitamin consumers world wide share their concern. De Fazio and Paul have bipartisanly told you:

"While CODEX has no direct authority to force Americans to adopt stringent regulations of dietary supplements, we are concerned that the United States may be forced to adopt Codex standards as a result of the United States status as a member of the WTO. According to an August 1999 report of the Congressional Research Service, As a member of the WTO, the United States does commit to act in accordance with the rules of the multilateral body. It [the US] is legally obligated to ensure that national laws do not conflict with WTO rules." De Fazio and Paul then told you "Thus, Congress may have a legal obligation to again change American laws [including our dietary supplement laws and all dietary supplement regulations] to conform with WTO rules!"

IAHF would like to see the Congressional Research service conduct a very thorough review as to the constitutionality of this situation, because it seems to us that our sovereignty is under naked, and very BLATANT attack due to membership in the WTO, which could soon over rule our Supreme Court. [The Loewen Group Inc. v. USA]

The outcome of this case is less important than the fact that it will be decided by the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes-a NAFTA panel. NAFTA, the panel ruled, has jurisdiction over complaints from foreign countries about court decisions in the United States. It also claims jurisdiction over complaints about state and federal administrative agency actions.

What About LOEWEN vs USA???

In the Loewen Group vs USA case, the NAFTA panel scheduled a hearing October 15 on whether the United States is liable for "damages" caused by a Mississippi jury's verdict against a Canadian company. The Canadians claimed that a hefty appeal bond was an "expropriation." The panels decision will be final and unappealable except on very limited grounds. Under NAFTA, U.S. courts are compelled to enforce the panel's decisions.

Mary Bottari of Public Citizen, a Ralph Nader group based in Washington, said this is "a very shocking and broad based decision. We now have a level of review for the U.S. court system that is above that of the U.S. Supreme Court.... and it is three international arbiters who operate in secret, and whose decisions cannot be appealed."

No public role will be allowed in the legal proceedings. Amicus Briefs will not be allowed. This is very different from the US Courts where proceedings are held in accordance with the United States Constitution, wouldn't the Congressional Research Service agree???

This is very disturbing to IAHF which does not want to see America destroyed and forced into a totalitarian world government in which our fate is determined via unelected bureaucrats such as Beth Yetley of the FDA, operating in very murky, largely non transparent CODEX meetings, far from our shores, where the American people can't easily see whats going on. (See MEDIA Section where the German Chair of the Codex meeting forced me to turn my camcorder off in 1998, illustrating the non transparency of Codex proceedings- for shooting this footage the FDA and for acting as a whistleblower trying to expose Yetley, Yetley had me thrown off the US Codex delegation to the CCNFSDU meeting in Germany, leaving me no option but to protest against the meeting in the street, and on the internet (See petitions against Codex at and at where 18,196 vitamin consumers in 101 countries world wide have expressed concern about this matter.

IAHF would like the Congressional Research Service to comment on the Loewen case, and to issue an opinion as to whether or not a similar secret panel, in the form of a WTO Dispute Settlement Panel or NAFTA Panel (like in the Loewen case) could similarly some day rule against our dietary suppelement laws due to some possible violation of the SPS or TBT agreements, and whether or not FDA's "harmonization" actions at CODEX place us in jeopardy of this possibly happening, and if so, we would like the Congressional Research Service to make detailed recommendations to Congress as to what actions are necessary to insure protection of our domestic laws- so that they can't be overruled this way.

We would like SPECIFIC recommendations to insure protection of our dietary supplement laws, and whether or not the FDA was obligated to obey the written directive of Chairman Burton (along with De Fazio, Paul, Cook, and Stump) when they issued the written directive in 1998 telling the FDA not to put the paper titled "A Risk Assessment Model for Establishing Safe Upper Levels for Nutrients" on the table at Codex. [See Letters from Congress, See MEDIA Section, videotape showing Dr.Yetley of FDA ignoring Burton's written directive, which was based directly on the will of the American people, and the Congress as expressed via Senator Orrin Hatch's Conference Report statement upon passage of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997. [See IAHF's written comments to Congress on the Codex Vitamin issue , click on the Green Spinning Disk.]


International Advocates for Health Freedom has been researching the Codex vitamin issue since 1996. We have been observing the FDA's actions relative to this issue from the standpoint of my being on the American delegation to the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU) chaired by Dr.Beth Yetley of the FDA, (the only person on the delegation with voting or speaking power at the Codex meetings.) As of March 30, IAHF has generated 6317 signatures on the petition at calling for genuine oversight of the Codex vitamin issue, and at 18,216 vitamin consumer from 101 different countries world wide are protesting against the Codex and EU anti vitamin initiatives which run so contrary to the best interests of the public health.

It would help IAHF and millions of vitamin consumers world wide who have been following the Codex vitamin issue through reports on the IAHF website and the IAHF email distribution list to get the Congressional Research Services specific comments and clarifications on the following information, questions and observations of IAHF:

1. Please go to to see the speech of Michael A. Friedman, then acting Commissioner of the FDA, made before the Senate Labor Committee on March 17, 1997 (4 years ago). [If this link won't work for any reason, go to and enter the search terms "Codex Standards, International Harmonization" Then scroll down til you find "Testimony of Michael A. Friedman" which was published in the FDA/CFSAN Federal Register 62 FR 36243 July 7, 1997.

In it Friedman stated: "FDA plans to amend its regulations and procedures for consideration of standards adopted by CODEX. This action is being taken to provide for the systematic review of CODEX STANDARDS in order to enhance consumer protection, promote international harmonization and fulfill the obligations of the United States under international agreements."

(He's referring to the Sanitary Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, (SPS), TBT and other numerous so called "Mutual Recognition Agreements" signed under NAFTA and the WTO by a Congress that never read any of the fine print:

Text of the Sanitary Phytosanitary Measures Agreement

Questions for the Congressional Research Service:

Was it constitutional for the USA to enter into the SPS and TBT agreements via NAFTA and via the Uruguay Round of GATT which created the WTO?

If so, how? Please explain. It seems to IAHF that Congress did not act in accordance with the Constitution, and that Congress should now be obligated to remove us from the WTO, NAFTA, GATT, SPS, TBT, CODEX in order to absolutely protect our democratically enacted laws from destruction.

Is it constitutionally acceptable for the FDA to "amend its regulations and procedures for consideration of standards adopted by CODEX"? Please explain in detail.

Is it constitutionally acceptable for the FDA to "promote international harmonization"? Please explain in detail.

[I want the situation below specifically reviewed in another oversight hearing and want CRS's analysis:

Does Congress have a constitutional right to tell the FDA not to engage in actions that the American people and the Congress have specifically stated they do not want, or can the FDA now legally IGNORE the will of Congress and the will of the American people as clearly expressed via the amendment to the harmonization language of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997 Public Law No. 105-115, 111 Stat. 2296 See section 803 (c), Paragraph c-5 saying "Paragraphs (1) through (4) shall not apply with respect to dietary supplements." (See IAHF's Written Comments to Congress, click on the green spinning disk to view.)

In a letter to me responding to legal questions about FDA's actions at Codex wherein they clearly ignored the will of the people as expressed through this amendment to the harmonization language of FDAMA, L.Robert Lake, Director of the Office of Regulatory Affairs at CFSAN, FDA stated:

"Paragraph (c)(5) operates solely to release FDA from the affirmative obligation established by paragraph (C)(3) of participating in harmonization efforts with regard to dietary supplements. It does not prohibit FDA from participating in these efforts. Indeed, for many years prior to the enactment of FDAMA, FDA participated in the work of Codex, including meetings of the Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses. Based on authority that in part predated FDAMA, FDA may continue to participate in international harmonization efforts in CODEX relating to dietary supplements. However FDA's harmonization activities may not change the requirements of the FDCA with regard to dietary supplements."

IAHF would like the Congressional Research Service to comment on what Lake is saying, especially in light of the fact that the amendment to the harmonization language of FDAMA, intended to protect consumers from the harmonization of our dietary supplement laws to restrictive Codex standards, was clearly the expressed will of the people and the will of Congress:

FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION MODERNIZATION ACT OF 1997--CONFERENCE REPORT (Senate - November 09, 1997) (See the sentence in all CAPS below, you only need to skim the rest)

[How I located this on the web: 1. 2. Underneath Congressional Record click on "Text Search" Select 105th Congress ('97-'98) 3. Use "dietary supplements" as search word 4. Select Senator Hatch 5. Date search from 11/09/97-11/09/97 6. Select 5th listing: FDAMA Conference Report Nov.9, '97 Scroll down to Hatch p.S12246

Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, I wanted to take this brief opportunity to commend Chairman Jeffords for a job well done--for producing a bill which will dramatically improve the way the Food and Drug Administration does business as we move into the 21st century.

That has been one of my top priorities during my service in the Senate. I am proud that we are having the opportunity today to vote on this historic legislation which will have so many benefits for my State of Utah.

Utah is the home to over 100 medical device manufacturers, and several pharmaceutical manufacturers as well. We also are the Nation's leading producer of dietary supplements .

The Utah Life Sciences Industries Association, the leading trade association for Utah device and drug manufacturers, has worked closely with the Congress in formulating this legislation, which will have many positive effects for Utah.

On behalf of our Utah drug and device manufacturers, let me thank you Chairman Jeffords, and our colleague in the House, Chairman Tom Bliley, for producing a bill which has encouraged the FDA to work in a more collaborative manner and to get the job done, to get it done professionally and expeditiously, without all the bureaucratic hassles we have experienced in the past.


Finally, I wish to thank all of the staff who worked literally through the night to make today's passage of the conference report for S. 830 possible. You can be proud of your work."

Additional QUESTIONs for Congressional Research Service:

Is Lake's interpretation of the amendment to the harmonization language of FDAMA accurate? If so, should Congress revisit this amendment and plug the holes, or don't they need to bother because all of FDA's actions vis a vis CODEX and SPS are unconstitional to start with?

Are FDA's actions at CODEX in fact unconstitutional, is IAHF incorrect in this view? (Please explain in detail.)

Is Hatch mistaken and or inaccurate in his assertion that our amendment truly protects the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 from FDA's harmonization efforts? Can FDA legally ignore the will of the people and the will of Congress this way?

Did Congressmen Burton, Paul, Stump, Cook and De Fazio have a constitutional and legal RIGHT to tell the FDA not to put the National Academy of Sciences paper "A Risk Assessment Model for Establishing Safe Upper Levels for Nutrients" on the table at Codex in accordance with the will of the American people who were registering their anger at this situation back in 1997 by sending enough faxes to the Senate Labor Committee to make the fax machines run out of paper and ink?

Do the American people have a RIGHT to object to FDA's putting this paper on the table at Codex given the fact that the National Academy of Sciences is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act since they're not part of the government but are a non profit 501 c-3 organization?

Do the American people have a RIGHT to object to FDA's use of this paper at Codex given the fact that the Codex process is unconstitutional- that we are allegedly being "represented" by an unelected bureaucrat from the FDA who is the only person on the US delegation with voting and speaking power?

Is it now legal and constitutional for Dr.Beth Yetley, an unelected bureaucrat, to ignore the will of the American people and the will of Congress and to take the action that she took at Codex over our direct written objection?

Doesn't Congress have a constitutional and moral mandate to protect the public health of the American people, in light of these concerns (and indeed of vitamin consumers world wide) by closely examining the NAS paper titled "A Risk Assessment Model for Establishing Safe Upper Levels for Nutrients" given the well reasoned scientific objections raised by Richard Malter, PhD and others (see NAS Paper and Rebuttals) especially given the fact that the NAS paper never underwent any public comments period, and that Malter's rebuttal was published in a respected medical journal? Doesn't Congress have a constitutional and moral obligation to hold the National Academy of Sciences paper up to the light of public scrutiny in light of these express concerns? Shouldn't Dr. Malter be invited to address this matter before Burton's committee for the sake of a careful public review?

"WTO members are free to choose the highest level of Health Protection they deem necessary provided the measures are based on scientific principles, and measures based on Codex are deemed to be consistent with the SPS agreement."

Does this mean that the USA must change its domestic vitamin laws in accordance with the risk assessment standards defined by the National Academy of Sciences in the paper titled " A Risk Assessment Model for Establishing Safe Upper Levels for Nutrients" (or via similar National Academy of Sciences protocols, such as the ones FDA's Joseph A. Levitt, esq. announced in his testimony that FDA had contracted NAS to develop through the contract titled "Framework for Evaluating the Role of Dietary Supplements in Health" or be in violation of the SPS agreement, which requires that all WTO member nations base their domestic vitamin laws on a basis of risk assessment?

The National Academy of Science is not part of the government, they're a non profit 501 c-3 organization. As such, they're not subject to the Freedom of Information Act. We can't get the raw data or CVs of the authors of any of their papers, thus there is no transparency in their deliberations, and there is no opportunity for public comments on their papers. Wouldn't this fact make it illegal under the Administrative Procedures Act and or the Federal Advisory Committees Act for the FDA to use NAS's findings at Codex, and for any changes to US law to occur directly or indirectly as a result? What about the case AFL CIO vs OSHA, 965 F.2d 962, 984 '11th Circuit 1992' wherein OSHA attempted to base rulemaking on data from a foreign NGO organization, thus ignoring the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and the Federal Administrative Procedures Act? Can the FDA legally ignore FACA and FAPA now that the USA has signed NAFTA, GATT, SPS, TBT???

While it is true that FDA's harmonization actions at Codex don't DIRECTLY threaten to undermine US dietary supplement laws, which we agree, only Congress can change, upon reviewing the case of Loewen vs USA and similar cases, IAHF has noticed a definite pattern that we find very alarming, and we would like for the Congressional Research Service to provide Congress with a set of specific recommendations as to steps we can take to absolutely insure that our dietary supplement laws, along with all of our other laws, cannot EVER be forced via the WTO and NAFTA to be changed.

IAHF would like the Congressional Research Service to provide specific guidance to Congress on this and for Congress to conduct additional oversight hearings on the Codex vitamin issue, as well as on all other issues of a similar nature where our domestic laws are being undermined by a pernicious process of "harmonization" to WTO so called "standards."

IAHF would like for Congressman Burton, Paul, De Fazio, and Boucher, as well as all Congressmen of people on the IAHF email distribution list to communicate back to us with the reply of the Congressional Research Service, and we would like Congressman Burton to hold additional hearings on this, but beyond holding hearings, we would like Congressman Burton to take very definite steps to insure that these grievous offenses against We, the People, are actually and in fact CORRECTED, because we don't want to wake up someday and find ourselves living under a totalitarian world government, run by unelected bureaucrats, operating via non transparent unconstitutional UN programs such as the Codex Alimentarius Commission, making non transparent decisions, in far away corners of the world, in places like Berlin, Geneva, Rome, Australia, etc, where we can't go in order to easily monitor what they're up to.

I would like the Congressional Research Service and the Congress to realize that when I was on the US Delegation to the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses, the government did not pay for my plane ticket to Germany.

I had to crawl over broken glass, raising donations from vitamin consumers on the internet, who wanted me to go in order to see what went on so I could report back to them. I should not have had to do that, and when I got to Germany, I should not have had to witness Dr. Yetley of the FDA ignore a letter that reflected the will of the American people and the will of Congress.

I should not have been told to turn off my camcorder.

I should not even have to be breaking my ass to write this, to explain ANY of this, but I am trying to do my part to defend the sovereign laws of this country, laws that I had input into and don't like seeing undermined by unconstitutional actions taken by unelected bureaucrats who seem to think they have a RIGHT to take these highly questionable and thoroughly offensive actions.

I want answers. This is still America. Congress must still obey the will of the people, and can't take any action without the express consent of the governed. Like it or not, that includes me, John Christopher Hammell of Floyd, Virginia, and I not only DEMAND justice here, I INSIST that my rights be protected. Please respond, in detail, to all of my concerns, please hold additional oversight hearings, but beyond holding hearings, please take CONCRETE ACTIONS to STOP the FDA and all other government bodies that are engaged in this process of harmonizing our laws to international standards. I like living in America. Washington DC is only 5 hours from me. Geneva, Berlin and Brussels are just too far away.

Having been to two UN Codex meetings in Bonn and Berlin Germany at which I had no vote, and was not allowed to speak, and at which the unelected bureaucrat from the FDA in charge of our delegation ignored my views, the will of Congress, and the views of all vitamin consumers across the USA and the world who I was there to represent, and then barred me from any future participation in this so called "process" in support of the German chair of the meeting who forced me to turn my camcorder off, I am very deeply saddened, disgusted, and outraged by this grossly immoral, grossly unconstitutional, non transparent situation, and the thousands of Americans signing the anti Codex petitions in cyberspace and in health food stores across this land share my heartfelt views and are very deeply offended and RIGHTFULLY SO.

Benjamin Rush, MD, signer of the Declaration of Independence attempted to warn us all that unless medical freedom was expressly written into the Constitution, that some day this situation that we're seeing unfold like some Kafkaesque novel would unfold as medicine organized itself into an undercover dictatorship. I hereby claim that health freedom is one of the unenumerated rights guaranteed to me under the 9th Amendment to the United States Constitution, and I reserve all of my rights accordingly.

Please, for the sake of the public health, we need GENUINE oversight on the Codex vitamin issue. We need ADDITIONAL hearings. We need HELP from the Congressional Research Service to expertly advise Congress on what actions must be taken to insure that our Constitutional rights be properly protected in light of these detailed concerns. Thank you for asking the Congressional Research Service to carefully examine this matter, but you can't just stop with that request. I look forward to you forwarding their reply to you regarding all of my specific questions, and I strongly request additional oversight hearings, and with them CONCRETE ACTION to correct these grievous wrongs.

For the Public Health,
John Christopher Hammell, President
International Advocates for Health Freedom
Post Office Box 625 Floyd, Virginia 24091 America 800-333-2553