marketed formulation of tadalafil odt tablets diflucan ampula como usar mobicontrol atovaquone proguanil doxycycline ic metronidazole 500 mg used diflucan nipple 72 hours when was levothyroxine approved by the fda metronidazole dose clostridium difficile can plavix cause leg pain viagra clinic houston what is the prescription valacyclovir used for paroxetine sodium is it okay to drink alcohol with cephalexin is it safe to breastfeed while taking paxil prednisone equivalent medrol dose pack i have diarrhea after taking azithromycin does walmart sell bactrim cream over the counter allopurinol bangladesh 1.25mg finasteride out of system buy ventolin tablets online azithromycin dosing for shigella infection viagra advertisement canada generic viagra and customs lethal dosage celexa terbinafine douleurs articulaires albuterol vs albuterol with ipratropium why not allegra with orange juice hygroton vs hydrochlorothiazide ou commander du baclofene finasteride with no side effects lexapro and prolonged qtc dosage of albuterol for a 5 month old baby by weight the drug keflex winstrol odblok nolvadex herpes treated with valtrex anyone on metformin linezolid use neonates nifedipine peripheral neuropathy lexapro oily skin aspirin clopidogrel tia paroxetine 50 mg side effects lisinopril sandoz allergische reaktion tamoxifen and sun tanning duloxetine yentreve levaquin reaction to sun levitra professional accept checking account boate viagra em sao carlos celebrex adalah prednisone hair loss doses withdrawal fom cymbalta flagyl wondzorg celebrex reviews for sciatica robaxin stomach aldactone 2 mg generic septra how many cialis per box azithromycin 200 mg oral suspension why metformin smells viagra unter 18 kaufen can you get high off of cialis amoxicillin 500 mg while breastfeeding is there sulfur in cipro hc otic drops can i buy misoprostol over the counter in michigan neurontin itp levaquin not working for uti aciclovir en pastillas dosis augmentin and fibromyalgia sildenafil reinaldo moraes hydrochlorothiazide ask a patient expiry of cialis haemobartonella felis doxycycline estradiol mass spectrum effective diet pills over the counter amoxicillin gegen borrelien overnight pharmacy cialis para que es nexium mups what is ventolin syrup puedo usar cytotec via oral 400 mg seroquel and alcohol fast does celexa work metronidazole mechanism of action rosacea metformin solubility in gastric retention take viagra with metformin dizzy coming off zoloft time for amlodipine to take effect how long does viagra keep in a container amitriptyline does dry mouth go away zyvox 600 mg used to treat chlamydia side effects viagra atrial fibrillation ingredients of diflucan can i take percocet after viagra pomada aciclovir indica??es celexa burping diflucan 100 mg generic acyclovir cream rld is tetracycline good for staph rx pharmacy viagra tamoxifen citrate liquid for sale clomid and lots of cm cialis 20 mg eyaculation viagra coverage by health insurance celexa for arthritis amlodipine for hbp lioresal 10 mg 25 mg effetti baclofen pharmacodynamics kamagra or apcalis premarin memory problems is neurontin like a narcotic finasteride 8 mois commander kamagra en ligne can i stop taking allopurinol viagra pages edinburgh search find free is clomid safe for a man ondansetron side effects pregnancy erythromycin ointment for the eyes celebrex is it safe to use 100 mg viagra street value nolvadex and reversitol prednisone 5mg during pregnancy can i take cialis with mitral valve prolapse vardenafil mix with tadalafil valacyclovir after cold sore outbreak cialis effets secondaires forum keunggulan dan kelemahan motor happy nexium cost of bactrim ds antibiotic tamoxifen und blutung leki topamax ceftriaxona ofloxacino ciprofloxacino thyroxine and eating dosis de ivermectina en perros y gatos metformin diarrhea pregnancy propecia how many doses can you miss accutane extremely oily skin erythromycin ilosone for 4 years old doxycycline aspirin can doxycycline hyclate cause a miscarriage is viagra made from watermelon rind finasteride side effects solution celexa ad ciprobay rosacea tamoxifen injection subcutaneous amitriptyline chewing erythromycin base versus erythromycin stearate atkins diet and xenical does gabapentin work for neuropathy hyper on prednisone zyprexa package insert im oxytetracycline dihydrate ph eur paroxetine troep rationale for use of furosemide lexapro celexa bystolic levothroid septran bus schedule losing weight on wellbutrin neurontin efectos colaterales misoprostol onde comprar bh linezolid ventriculitis can you take diet pills while on accutane celebrex side effects urination can you lower propecia dosage viagra prevnts premature ejeculation cytotec costo m?xico atorvastatin and citrus cephalexin for adults tetracycline hydrochloride and milk can you give dogs metronidazole 10 mg of lexapro and the 5mg any side effects lamotrigine and abilify taken together venta sildenafil barcelona is cipro an antibiotic for strep throat pomada aciclovir 50mg is bactrim good for abscess can lisinopril 10 mg cause kidney stones purchase clomiphene baownbeuv metronidazole causing yeast infections what are the side effects of cipro medication ivermectina inyectable virbac lasix effect on bicarb inderalici e hipertiroidismo doxycycline atypical coverage discount nizoral shampoo erbrechen nach amoxicillin wellbutrin side effects flatulence azithromycin 250 mg dosage calculation erythromycin timing cialis 20 mg take with food zoloft irregular menstrual cycle viagra in sri lanka in price ciprofloxacina denk 500 mg and breastfeeding metformin cinsel isteksizlik costochondritis accutane acyclovir medicine suppliers canada ?r cialis farligt zyloprim guercmorteo australia zithromax family drugs cialis super active generic can you freebase wellbutrin does women take viagra montelukast montiget effect on pregnancy zofran safe dose range doxycycline can you take it with food lisinopril5mg hctz 25mg side effects of long term levothyroxine where can i go buy clomid nolvadex injection augmentin 500 mod de administrare will lamisil cure jock itch how to take tadacip finasteride repubblica recommended dose of doxycycline to treat chlamydia nexium versus prevacid maxalto acanto chair what happens when you miss a dose of metoprolol bupropion sr bupropion sr how much will the generic viagra metformin 500mg pcos signs of cymbalta withdrawal buy propecia in walgreens best price for avodart .5 mg capsules methergine and erythromycin valores estradiol en embarazo famvir treatment for shingles cheap albuterol nebulizer machine how to wean off lisinopril self pay for montelukast sod 5mg erythromycin livestrong mirena and metformin atorvastatin volume of distribution clomid when to ovulate does nizoral slow hair loss albuterol sulfate .083 dosing erythromycin induced clindamycin resistance viagra tyrkia buy lasix in a scottish chemist anafranil skutki sun exposure to amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium doxycycline and gastritis no more panic lexapro nursing implications of singulair in newborn viagra chemical ingredients can you take bactrim ds if your allergic to penicillin still breaking out month 5 accutane zoloft next day does synthroid come in a patch lavetahealthcare com buy valacyclovir tetracycline hcl teaching clomid y la ottawa nolvadex gabapentin och alkohol lexapro how many mg obat farizol metronidazole 500mg redux orlistat uruguay can i buy cialis online in canada can ciprofloxacin cause leg pain tamoxifen wrinkles can i take doxycycline with paracetamol escitalopram monograph doxycycline side effects in kittens meloxicam side effects depression accutane reclaim your skin can you take metformin if you don have diabetes augmentin preseptal cellulitis how to take ciprofloxacin hydrochloride tomar viagra generico cheap zoloft no prescription aciclovir guercmorteo reviews buying viagra in philippines norvasc arb dealing with prednisone withdrawal symptoms is viagra illegal malaysia presentacion del aciclovir pediatrico lexapro kupie bad side effect of lexapro gabapentin for tbi amoxicillin or z pack for sinus infection glucophage serious side effects 800 mg celebrex ciprofloxacin side effect fever allopurinol usa cost of bupropion 300 mg clarithromycin und plavix orlistat buy from india herbal ephedra diet pills miracle general antibiotic amoxicillin the most common side effects of celexa finasteride handling precautions cialis p e pms finasteride same as propecia zovirax suspension cost prices of acyclovir in united arab emirates comprare cialis online pagamento alla consegna cialis genuine buy how can i get viagra in dubai generic viagra availability united states dostinex tablet ne ise yarar prednisone pack and breastfeeding ciprofloxacin tabl 500mg contains existe t il un viagra pour femme seroquel and blood shot eyes viagra 15 minutes singulair case study avapro sales typesviagra on line dostinex ibuprofen erfahrungen mit allopurinol 100mg of viagra vs 20mg of lavitra does metformin really help pcos how many pills does it take zithromax to cure trich pfizer viagra egypt how much gabapentin do you need to get high pain in legs from prednisone exempel p? r?ttviseprincipen inom v?rden misoprostol dosis abortiva 8 semanas recommended dose of metformin for infertility breast cancer premarin baclofen in esrd clomid combate a ginecomastia symptoms of not taking synthroid alli orlistat mercury drugstore philippines 10 day dosage of doxycycline for sinus infection when did tamoxifen start being used can a diabetic take zithromax viagra 4 woman in south africa durban precio del viagra en farmacias peru can alcohol be used when taking cipro fro a uti dosage of amoxicillin for stds cialis daily cinco miligramos ventolin inhaler 100 mcg 200 doz fiyati cialis commercial wording finasteride sale australia allergies to diflucan amlodipine losartan combination tablets if taking zoloft and topamax together can u get valtrex over counter valacyclovir iv quick weight loss lose fat best diet pill clomid and timed intercourse doxycycline hyclate and thc can you take advil and cephalexin aciclovir pomata prezzo propranolol en zwangerschap what is the difference between clomid and metformin aciclovir en pastillas para herpes genital ketoconazole shampoo for pimples jenis amoxicillin clomid 50 enceinte can ciprofloxacin cause anxiety tome cytotec y sigo embarazada revista 7 dias de cachoeiro zithromax para sifilis kamagra 160 mg aili diet pill diltiazem cream cost mobic ckd lots of cm with clomid amoxil 500 for uti neurontin anti anxiety drug normal length of time for diflucan 100 mg allopurinol tpmt typical dosage for clomid can dogs take fluconazole 150 mg zithromax compared to cipro can lexapro be taken with cialis together baldtruthtalk dutasteride spotting after stopping clomid crushing up azithromycin luvox cr 100mg cost is cephalexin safe for puppies itchy bumps zoloft can you take pepto bismol with tetracycline birth defects associated with finasteride side effects clomid uk dealing with pcos without metformin are biotech ciprofloxacin safe for pregnancy viagra equivelent over the counter azithromycin pediatric dose od or bd cipro and gerd clomid 3 giorno starting celexa symptoms uk tamoxifen symptoms synthroid toxicity acyclovir ointment while pregnant comprar propecia argentina cipro and dogs montelukast sodium 4mg tab chew side effects amoxicillin suspension with food cialis in wonderland misoprostol uso ginecologico effetti abuso cialis hydrochlorothiazide yan etkileri amoxicillin market name revatio infusion 5mg lexapro for dysthymia propranolol as contraceptive nortriptyline less sedating than amitriptyline red c200 viagra seroquel and grapefruit cipro how to take food obat cravox levofloxacin 500 mg naproxen bijsluiter purchase misoprostol tqeovertoz does clomid increase the chances of multiples amnesteem generic accutane generisches propecia role of duloxetine in pain management is female viagra safe synthroid estroven lasix farmaco using diflucan treat vulvodynia can one viagra pill produce more than one ejaculation cheap orlistat india clopidogrel induced bleeding cialis falta de libido zofran paramedic drug card cialis lilly company zoloft 50 emagrece anorgasmia antidepressants lamisil for sale tablets terbinafine 250 mg how long take for ringworm how fast do you lose weight on topamax doxycycline and kidney infections what meds can you not take with viagra sildenafil from uk buspar tca comprar synthroid levothyroxine 50 mcg e faecalis doxycycline seroquel timed release names of actors who have been in cialis commercials nexium bronchospasm tadalafil efficacy side effects of zoloft breastfeeding lipitor causes dizziness propranolol in bangladesh generic viagra how soon can i drink after metronidazole idoes paxilcalls difference between rabeprazole and esomeprazole cialis adam4adam day 4 of taking clomid how many milligrams of spironolactone for hair loss lioresal intrathecal spc cialis 20 mg chile wellbutrin head tingling amoxicillin treats what std doxycycline dispertablet 100mg augmentin inj stability does lexapro have a maoi in it levothyroxine and herbs nifedipine chemical structure peperoncino e viagra lamisil svamp i underlivet abilify copay reduction aciclovir dorom 400 mg compresse prezzo amendoim serve como viagra vancouver viagra synthroid and high tsh metronidazole tablets crushed fungating milligrams what if cipro doesnt work for uti mifepristone oraz misoprostol cymbalta gi problems cephalexin dose baby use of metformin 500mg fluconazole 150mg breast thrush olanzapine hereisthebestin side effects implantation calculator on clomid will amoxicillin cause false positive boots viagra glasgow what are cymbalta withdrawal effects buying cytotec ph how much does cialis cost costco canada ingredients for bupropion disulfiram yahoo answers baclofen dosage uk albuterol for mild asthma antibiotic doxycycline nausea sleep and cialis viagra be gone aciclovir harga does flomax work in women levitra ile kosztuje strattera gewichtszunahme ketoconazole econazole amitriptyline and lexapro forums uk erythromycin 1 0 g can you take nyquil with topamax lipitor lowering cholesterol erythromycin ophthalmic ointment usp cost tamoxifeno funk viagra no prescription branded flagyl reactions alcohol do generic viagra pills work cytotec 6 sg difference between tetracycline and chloramphenicol 5 mg cialis wont work what do i do how to counter headache from viagra is there a generic equivalent to nexium do you take clomid on day 3 of your period zovirax ointment for oral herpes metformin hydrochloride tablets 850mg epocrates cephalexin pediatric dosing aripiprazole studies prednisone for bulging disc in neck

To: IAHF List
Subject: Article By Dr.Gaby: Safe Upper Limits for Nutritional Supplements: One Giant Step BACKWARD
Date: 27 Jan 2004 21:57:13 -0000

IAHF List: Alan Gaby, MD just sent me his article (see below) which was just published in the Special Issue of the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine on the Safety and Efficacy of Vitamins. The footnotes are not included, if you require the footnotes, please order a copy of the original from JOM at

I just sent this article to Dr.Antoinette Booyzen, South African Codex Delegate who as things currently stand, appears to be convinced that CRN's views on "Safe Upper Limits" are "scientific". This article refutes any such conclusion. Please forward it to your countries delegate to the UN Codex Alimentarius Commission's Committee on Nutrition and Food for Special Dietary Uses.

There is a very real danger that unless enough vitamin consumers world wide lobby against it, a grossly unscientific vitamin standard could be rushed through to completion at the next Codex meeting in November in Bonn, Germany.

I am especially concerned that pharma dominated controlled opposition groups CRN and IADSA have announced their intention to hold a political summit meeting two days before the next Codex meeting. Unless enough consumers world wide get behind ANH's legal and lobbying efforts, we won't be able to stop the pharmaceutical takeover of the natural products industry. (The CRN meeting is October 24- 27th, the CRN/IADSA Political Summit to screw the dietary supplement industry is being held October 28-29th, and the Codex meeting is the following monday, 2 days later, starting November 1st......)

Want more help in connecting the dots? Read the Cover story interview Greg Ciola did with me in the Dec/Jan issue of The Health Crusader Magazine at Please forward this like wildfire throughout your up and downlines if you are a network marketing distributor for any CRN member company: Mannatech, Shaklee, Herbalife, GNLD, NuSkin.

These companies have been lied to by CRN in a press release on CRN's website which proclaims that a "victory" has been won at Codex due to RDA's being scrapped in favor of so called "Safe Upper Levels" (allegedly based on "science") but Gaby's article (see below) EXPLODES that contention....

I am blown away by the naivete of such people as Sam Caster at Mannatech who has been flattered by CRN's making him a Board Member so he thinks John Hathcock at CRN is "his friend". Sam better wake up, because Hathcock used to work at FDA and might as well STILL be working at FDA, and he's NOT our friend, Gaby's article EXPLODES any contention that we can trust Hathcock's so called "scientific" risk assessment methodology, which was misextrapolated from toxicological risk assessment methodology originally intended for the evaluation of toxic pharmaceutical DRUGS and which they're MISAPPLYING to safe vitamins.

Never forget that CRN is dominated by Wyeth, Monsanto, Bayer, BASF, and Pfizer....

"Safe Upper Limits" for nutritional supplements: one giant step backward

by Alan R. Gaby, M.D.

In May, 2003, the "Expert Group on Vitamins and Minerals" (EVM), an advisory group originally commissioned in 1988 by the then Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, and subsequently reporting to the Food Standards Agency in England, published a report that set "Safe Upper Limits" (SULs) for the doses of most vitamin and mineral supplements. The establishment of SULs was based on a review of clinical and epidemiological evidence, as well as animal research and in vitro studies. For those nutrients for which the available evidence was judged insufficient to set an SUL, the EVM instead established "Guidance Levels", which were to be considered less reliable than SULs.

This writer's analysis of the EVM report reveals that the dose limits were set inappropriately low for many vitamins and minerals; well below doses which have been used by the public for decades with apparent safety. While the release of this 360-page document would be of little import, were it to be used solely as a manifesto for the pathologically risk-averse, preliminary indications are that it could be used very actively to support the arguments of those who are seeking to ban the over-the-counter sale of many currently available nutritional supplements. If the report is used that way, then the public health could be jeopardized.

On May 30, 2002, the European Union adopted Directive 2002/46/EC, which established a framework for setting maximum limits for vitamins and minerals in food supplements. The EVM report is seen by the UK government as the basis for its negotiating position in the process of setting these pan-European limits.

The apparent anti-nutritional-supplement, anti-self-care bias that permeated the process of setting safety limits is evident both in the way in which the SUL was defined and in the fact that the benefits of nutritional supplements were purposely ignored. The SUL was defined as the maximum dose of a particular nutrient "that potentially susceptible individuals could take daily on a life-long basis, without medical supervision in reasonable safety." In other words, it is the highest dose that is unlikely to cause anyone any harm, ever, under any circumstance. Furthermore, the EVM was specifically instructed not to consider the benefits of any of the nutrients, and not to engage in risk/benefit analysis.

There is little or no precedent in free societies for restricting access to products or activities to levels that are completely risk-free. Aspirin causes intestinal bleeding, water makes people drown, driving a car causes accidents, and free speech may offend the exquisitely offendable. Politicians and bureaucrats do not seek to ban aspirin or water or driving or free speech, because their benefits outweigh their risks. For vitamins and minerals, however, some authorities seem to believe that unique safety criteria are needed.

Moreover, the government's instructions to disregard the many documented benefits of nutritional supplements introduced a serious bias into the evaluation process. As the EVM acknowledged, determining safety limits involves an enormous degree of uncertainty and a fairly wide range of possible outcomes. The committee might have established higher safety limits than it did, had it been told to weigh benefits against risks. The government's instructions appeared to be an implicit directive to err on the side of excluding doses that are being used to prevent or treat disease. And that is what the EVM did, often by making questionable interpretations of the data, and doing so in what appears to have been an arbitrary and inconsistent manner.

Riboflavin Guidance Level

A typical example of the EVM's dubious approach to establishing safety limits is its evaluation of riboflavin. The committee acknowledged that no toxic effects have been reported in animals given an acute oral dose of 10,000 mg/kg of body weight, or after long-term ingestion of 25 mg/kg/day (equivalent to 1,750 mg/day for a 70-kg human). Moreover, in a study of 28 patients taking riboflavin for migraine prophylaxis, a dose of 400 mg/day for 3 months did not cause any adverse effects. Despite a complete absence of side effects at any dose in either humans or animals, the EVM set the Guidance Level for riboflavin at 40 mg/day. That level was established by dividing the 400 mg/day used in the migraine study by an "uncertainty factor" of 10, to allow for variability in the susceptibility of human beings to adverse effects.

A more appropriate conclusion regarding riboflavin would have been that no adverse effects have been observed at any dose, and that there is no basis at this time for establishing an upper limit. If the EVM's recommendation is used to limit the potency of riboflavin tablets to 40 mg, then migraine sufferers will have to take 10 pills per day, in order to prevent migraine recurrences.

Vitamin B6 Safe Upper Limit

Similar reasoning led to an SUL of 10 mg/day for vitamin B6, even though this vitamin has been used with apparent safety, usually in doses of 50 to 200 mg/day, to treat carpal tunnel syndrome, premenstrual syndrome, asthma, and other common problems. The SUL for vitamin B6 was derived from an animal study, in which a dose of 50 mg/kg of body weight/day (equivalent to 3,000 mg/day for a 60-kg person) resulted in neurotoxicity. The EVM reduced that dose progressively by invoking three separate "uncertainty factors:" 1) by a factor of 3, to extrapolate from the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) to a no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL); 2) by an additional factor of 10, to account for presumed inter-species differences; and 3) by a further factor of 10 to account for inter-individual variation in humans. Thus, the neurotoxic dose in animals was reduced by a factor of 300, to a level that excludes the widely used 50- and 100-mg tablets.

The decision to base the SUL for vitamin B6 on animal data (modified by a massive "uncertainty factor") was arbitrary, considering that toxicology data are available for humans. A sensory neuropathy has been reported in some individuals taking large doses of vitamin B6. Most people who suffered this adverse effect were taking 2,000 mg/day or more of pyridoxine, although some were taking only 500 mg/day. There is a single case report of a neuropathy occurring in a person taking 200 mg/day of pyridoxine, but the reliability of that case report is unclear. The individual in question was never examined, but was merely interviewed by telephone after responding to a local television report that publicized pyridoxine-induced neuropathy.

Because pyridoxine neurotoxicity has been known to the medical profession for 20 years, and because vitamin B6 is being taken by millions of people, it is reasonable to assume that neurotoxicity at doses below 200 mg/day would have been reported by now, if it does occur at those doses. The fact that no such reports have appeared strongly suggests that vitamin B6 does not damage the nervous system when taken at doses below 200 mg/day. As the EVM did with other nutrients for which a LOAEL is known for humans, it could have divided the vitamin B6 LOAEL (200 mg/day) by 3 to obtain an SUL of 66.7 mg/day. Had the committee been allowed to evaluate both the benefits and risks of vitamin B6, it probably would have established the SUL at that level, rather than the 10 mg/day it arrived at through serial decimation of the animal data.

Manganese Guidance Level

Chronic inhalation of high concentrations of airborne manganese, as might be encountered in mines or steel mills, has been reported to cause a neuropsychiatric syndrome that resembles Parkinson's disease. In contrast, manganese is considered one of the least toxic trace minerals when ingested orally, and reports of human toxicity from oral ingestion are "essentially nonexistent." The neurotoxicity that occurs in miners and industrial workers may result from a combination of high concentrations of manganese in the air and, possibly, direct entry of nasally inhaled manganese into the brain (bypassing the blood-brain barrier).

In establishing a Guidance Level for manganese, the EVM cited a study by Kondakis et al, in which people exposed to high concentrations of manganese in their drinking water (1.8-2.3 mg/L) had more signs and symptoms of subtle neurological dysfunction than did a control group whose drinking water contained less manganese. The committee acknowledged that another epidemiological study by Vieregge et al showed no adverse effects among individuals whose drinking water contained up to 2.1 mg/L of manganese. The EVM hypothesized that these studies may not really be contradictory, since the subjects in the Kondakis study were, on average, 10 years older than were those in the Vieregge study, and increasing age might theoretically render people more susceptible to manganese toxicity. Based on the results of these two studies, the EVM established a Guidance Level for supplemental manganese of 4 mg/day for the general population and 0.5 mg/day for elderly individuals.

There are serious problems with the EVM's analysis of the manganese research. First, the committee overlooked that fact that in the Kondakis study the people in the high-manganese group were older than were those in the control group (mean age, 67.6 vs. 65.6 years). Many of the neurological symptoms that were investigated in this study are nonspecific and presumably age related, including fatigue, muscle pain, irritability, insomnia, sleepiness, decreased libido, depression, slowness in rising from a chair, and memory disturbances. The fact that the older people had more symptoms than did the younger people is not surprising, and may have been totally unrelated to the manganese content of their drinking water.

Second, the EVM broke its own rules regarding the use of uncertainty factors, presumably to avoid being faced with an embarrassingly low Guidance Level for the general population. In setting the level at 4 mg/day, the committee stated: "No uncertainty factor is required as the NOAEL [obtained from the Vieregge study] is based on a large epidemiological study." As a point of information, the Nurses' Health Study was a large epidemiological study, enrolling more than 85,000 participants. The Beaver Dam Eye Study was a medium-sized epidemiological study, enrolling more than 3,000 participants. In contrast, in the Vieregge study, there were only 41 subjects in the high-manganese group, making it a very small epidemiological study. In its evaluation of the biotin, riboflavin, and pantothenic acid research, the EVM reduced the NOAEL by an uncertainty factor of 10, in part because only small numbers of subjects had been studied. Considering that more subjects were evaluated in the pantothenic acid research (n = 94) than in the Vieregge study (n = 41), it would seem appropriate also to use an uncertainty factor the for manganese data. Applying an uncertainty factor of 10 to the Vieregge study would have produced an absurdly low Guidance Level of 0.4 mg/day for supplemental manganese, which is well below the amount present in a typical diet (approximately 4 mg/day) and which can be obtained by drinking several sips of tea. Parenthetically, in a study of 47,351 male health professionals, drinking large amounts of tea (a major dietary source of manganese) was associated with a reduced risk of Parkinson's disease, not an increased risk. In changing its methodology to avoid reaching an indefensible conclusion, the EVM revealed the arbitrary and inconsistent nature of its evaluation process.

Niacin (nicotinic acid) Guidance Level

Large doses of niacin (such as 3,000 mg/day) can cause hepatotoxicity and other significant side effects. The EVM focused its evaluation, however, on the niacin-induced skin flush, which occurs at much lower doses. The niacin flush is a sensation of warmth on the skin, often associated with itching, burning, or irritation that occurs after the ingestion of niacin and disappears relatively quickly. It appears to be mediated in part by the release of prostaglandins. The niacin flush is not considered a toxic effect per se, and there is no evidence that it causes any harm. People who do not like the flush are free not to take niacin supplements or products that contain niacin. For those who are unaware that niacin causes a flush, an appropriate warning label on the bottle would provide adequate protection.

Granting, for the sake of argument, that the niacin flush is an adverse effect from which the public should be protected, the EVM's Guidance Level still is illogical. The committee noted that flushing is consistently observed at a dose 50 mg/day, which it established as the LOAEL. That dose was reduced by an uncertainty factor of 3, in order to extrapolate the LOAEL to a NOAEL. Thus, the Guidance Level was set at 17 mg/day, which approximates the RDA for the vitamin. The EVM also noted, however, that flushing has been reported at doses as low as 10 mg, so the true LOAEL is 10 mg/day. Applying the same uncertainty factor of 3 to the true LOAEL would have yielded a Guidance Level of a paltry 3.3 mg/day, which probably is not enough to prevent an anorexic person from developing pellagra. As with manganese, the EVM applied its methodology in an arbitrary and inconsistent manner, so as to avoid being faced with an embarrassing result.

Vitamin C Guidance Level

The EVM concluded that vitamin C does not cause significant adverse effects, although gastrointestinal (GI) side effects may occur with high doses. The committee therefore set a Guidance Level based on a NOAEL for GI side effects. It is true that taking too much vitamin C, just like eating too many apples, may cause abdominal pain or diarrhea. The dose at which vitamin C causes GI side effects varies widely from person to person, but can easily be determined by each individual. Moreover, these side effects can be eliminated by reducing the dose. Most people who take vitamin C supplements know how much they can tolerate; for those who do not, a simple warning on bottles of vitamin C would appear to provide the public all the protection it needs. Considering the many health benefits of vitamin C, attempting to dumb down the dose to a level that will prevent the last stomachache in Europe is not a worthwhile goal. However, as mentioned previously, the EVM was instructed to ignore the benefits of vitamin C.

Granting, for the sake of argument, that there is value in setting a Guidance Level for GI side effects, the EVM did a rather poor job of setting that level. The committee established the LOAEL at 3,000 mg/day, based on a study of a small number of normal volunteers. An uncertainty factor of 3 was used to extrapolate from the LOAEL to a NOAEL, resulting in a Guidance Level of 1,000 mg/day. However, anyone practicing nutritional medicine knows that some patients experience abdominal pain or diarrhea at vitamin C doses of 1,000 mg/day or less, and the EVM did acknowledge that GI side effects have been reported at doses of 1,000 mg. It is disingenuous to set a NOAEL and then to concede that effects do occur at the no-effect level. To be consistent with the methodology it used for other nutrients, the committee should have set the LOAEL at 1,000 mg/day, and reduced it by a factor of 3 to arrive at a NOAEL of 333 mg/day. The EVM was no doubt aware of the credibility problems it would have faced, had it suggested that half the world is currently overdosing on vitamin C. To resolve its dilemma, the committee used a scientifically unjustifiable route to arrive at a seemingly politically expedient outcome.


These and other examples from the report demonstrate that the EVM applied its methodology in an arbitrary and inconsistent manner, in arriving at "safety" recommendations that are excessively and inappropriately restrictive. While the directive to evaluate only the risks, and to ignore the benefits, of nutritional supplements created a rigged game, the members of the EVM appeared to be willing participants in that game.

If the EVM report is used to relegate currently available nutritional supplements to prescription-only status, then millions of people would be harmed, and very few would benefit. It would be of little consolation that the higher doses of vitamins and minerals could still be obtained with a doctor's prescription, because most doctors know less about nutrition than many of their patients do. Moreover, the overburdened health-care system is in no position to take on the job of gatekeeper of the vitamin cabinet; nor is there any need for it to do so.

Ironically, as flawed as the EVM report is, its recommendations may ultimately prove to be "as good as it gets" in Europe. Other European countries are recommending that maximum permitted levels be directly linked to multiples of the RDA, which could result in limits for some nutrients being set substantially lower than those suggested in the EVM report.

While some nutritional supplements can cause adverse effects in certain clinical situations or at certain doses, appropriate warning labels on vitamin and mineral products would provide ample protection against most of those risks.

Note: Reprinted with permission from the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine (in press), as part of a special issue devoted to clearing up the confusion about the toxicity of vitamins.

For Health Freedom,
John C. Hammell, President
International Advocates for Health Freedom
556 Boundary Bay Road
Point Roberts, WA 98281-8702 USA
800-333-2553 N.America
360-945-0352 World