why do people buy strattera off the street THUMBUY.COM is pms valacyclovir used to treat canker sores usual dose of lopressor for mitral valve prolapse diflucan dosage for male yeast infection cozaar 25 mg metronidazole injection price in kerala drhildaong.com maxifort vs viagra chatcufete.com cabergoline dose at bwt of dog chatcufete.com online viagra from canada apparel-chic.com order mifeprex and misoprostol online micardis plus foglietto illustrativo sildenafil citrate 100 mg duration doxycycline in the us xenical per day en ecuador esta prohibido la venta del cytotec montelukast levocetirizine kid dosage name for generic anastrozole 1 definition augmentin retard 1000 mg 62 5mg en francais spacecityparent.com how many days take amoxicillin for boils proster 200 misoprostol chatcopii.com como saber se o cytotec e verdadeiro clomid 8 follicles nizoral shampoo expiration delite.cn dexcipro eyedrop chen-liu.com avodart 5 mg dog overdose baclofen 10mg ed meds no prescription with discover card buy doxycycline tablets malaria metronidazole 500 for dogs solumedrol iv oral thrush treatment diflucan buying viagra in the bahamas otc buy generic zyvox nexium 24 hours otc cost wikipedia baclofen lorazepam interaction with metronidazole fake azithromycin dzidzior.pl accommodationmadeasy.com avmdtogo.org egyptereizen.org fehmierduran.com quetiapine 60 mg ondansetron odt can you take it for upset stomanch how long for fluconazole to leave your system raloxifene 30 mg thuoc amitriptylinechlohydrate does viclofen effect escitalopram feifan8.net drugprevent.org.uk directmobility.co.uk clopidogrel camsylate cialis 5 mg daily side effects half life of half inderal lipitor 4 dollar copay participating pharmacies dinkim.com synthroid allergic patients alternative treatments cdfeorellana.com directmobility.co.uk akademia-active.pl quetiapine 5o mg wake up drowsiness metformin 750mg in drug test dapoxetine buy sg can i get olanzapine in the uae entech.com covenantofpoppies.com easyjet.net.pl can azithromycin be taken after aborting two years ago can bactrim cause long term health problems lasix medication class pdf ciprofloxacinoxr500 e o mesmo ciplofacino fr 500 list and prize of antibiotics in the phil. generic zyban australia lamisil ingrediant to treat ringworm long term daily safe dose of prednisone for dogs can diflucan be taken on a regular basis NEOHAIRINDO.COM nifedipine 20 mg and atenolol 12.5mg good combination propecia dosage daily why celexa causes diarrhea sinequan 10 indomethacin suppository cost how effective is lamisil pills cuento flagyl dairy breastfeeding and taking 5mg lexapro eastriverpartners.info nh coumadin level machine akademia-active.pl how does orlistat work in infertility difference between tamsulosin and finasteride tinea corporis nizoral review can topamax lyrica and depakote be taken together harga chloramphenicol tablet dickhopper.com medicamentos celebrex celecoxib 100 mg dutasteride 5 years fluconazole 150 uses zoloft taper off mail order and viagra olanzapine citalopram interaction buspar prices images of paroxetine boxes in indian market kegunaan piroxicam gel can u take to how much furosemide is safe heavyanalytics.com carlosfloresmusic.com alcohol consumption with terbinafine actavis cipro travelers diarrhea metoprolol 25 mg tab nizoral shampoo en colombia can you buy viagra in thailand us dollars which antidepressant is right for me anafranil 25 mg drake obat apa dosage to switch from cymbalta to zoloft apartamenty-kasztelanskie.pl dickhopper.com buy zyprexa paxil vs lexapro dog no appetite while taking metronidazole DORREAJATETXEA.COM how long do side effects last with propranolol 10mg gabapentin 300 mg and methamphetamine india herbalviagra brand stlsoccer.net is paracetamol compatible with mirtazapine allcoinreviews.org how much does prozac cost uk ciesielstwokukulak.com.pl online otc cytotec philippines nursing teaching on buspar generic valtrex cost marashthermal.com muallimkoyosgb.com how long does it take for clomid side effects to start propranolol tablets 80 mg cymbalta hypomania how does essential oils mix with drug finasteride panoramainternetu.pl amitriptyline 25 gm gogle mamfaat obat zithromax 500mg es08.com what is the target organ of thyroxine bbc bitesize cyproheptadine is steroid retail price for viagra chatcufete.com what have been the results of cialis taken daily fotografie-cursus.net buy feldene p gel viagra how to use the first time in urdu does 150 mcg of synthroid mess up periods sertraline lowest cost no insurance seroquel effectivenes on sperm ciesielstwokukulak.com.pl levitra online drugs how much does singulair cost without insurance cuanto cuesta la caja de cytotec en peru lipitor price comparison ireland onset pemberian amoxicillin sertraline hcl 59 mg possible side effects starting clomid mid cycle seroquel 400 mg price zofran for sale online africanamericanimages.us how.much is amoxicillin at walmart.without.insurance misoprostol 200 mcg what to expect when your expecting mengobati scabies dengan amoxilin 2exhibitions.com what is bactrim ds used for tengo un mes me puedo tomar cytotec sar of digoxin.pdf lbc4help.org progesterone prometrium generic cost DORREAJATETXEA.COM doxycycline pigeons uk liquid what is another name for acyclovir in nigeria fluoxetine after 3 weeks glimepiride 1 mg adalah can amoxicillin be taken with other anibiotics how to stop taking citalopram 10mg shapirogalvinlaw.com sekerpinarosgb.com ansbach-direkt.de mirtazapine remeron quato costa balitoursclub.com doxycycline 200 mg acne iphone-accessory.cn i am on coumadine can i take nyquil purchase viagra without prescription ciesielstwokukulak.com.pl nitric oxide viagra es08.com verapamil er 120 mg tablets dosage celibar.pl can u do botox on doxycycline monohydrate seroquel 907 what happens if you take nyquil and trazodone pret xenical 84 capsule does mirtazapine or quetiapine cause bloating buy accutane greece metoprolol succinate and atenolol equivalant dose ascbelfast.com goggle escitalopram lisinopril price walmart how much does generic viagra cost in canada misoprostol 100 mg uses cflailesi.org over the counter liquid albuterol does clomiphene increase risk of downs syndrome can ciprolex tz be used to cure all stds manfaat clomid 50 mg dan harganya atorvastatin side effects wine does lexapro make you crave carbohydrates azithromycin fever chills lisinopril 0.5 mg in india mirtazapine experience blackisbusiness.info metformin hcl rite med for pcos patient can misoprostol damage the pregnancy of 3 weeks levofloxacin and knee replacement bridgehousemedia.com medroxyprogesterone icd 9 code ene-mene-mini.pl misoprostol 72 hours seroquel mouth ulcers how long do they take to go away viagra tablet cz ativan percocet elavil yeast infection tongue after taking flagyl viagra casera 30 mg prednisone a day akademia-active.pl olanzapine 30 mg day when recommended viagra price in india online purchase panoramainternetu.pl premarin estrogenos conjugados o.3 mg gra propecia price comparison bactrim and birth control pills for acne buy valtrex overnight isotretinoin manufacturer coupon obat diovan does paroxetine reduction cause head tremour cytotec miscarriage side effects generic valtrex dog with pneumonia on flagyl danazol 100 mg 50 t bisenconsulting.com generic cialis 10 mg buy baclofen propranolol cost without insurance price of lipitor at walmart egyptereizen.org is niacin safe with lisinopril anafranil 75 prezzo proscar 30 dopasujbuty.pl can i take antibiotic 12 hours after i drank alcohol pazarlamacadisi.com clozapine 100 mg i have on paxil for 20 years and i successful with it bridgehousemedia.com is misoprostol safe while breastfeeding log p linezolid amoxicillin 500 mg for staph infection terbinafine philippines baclofen 20 mg para que es MASTERRAFTING.COM transdermal verapamil cost tamoxifen drug price in philippines what is shelf life of lipitor thyroxine elixir functions how to ween off prednisone 10mg earlier than 12 days zofran and benadryl stomach flu fehmierduran.com can i give my cat doxycycline 50 mg allcoinreviews.org buy levitra viagra online seadoo-maldives.com augmentin posologia adulti mercury drug ph nexium price dinkim.com paxil in combination with luvox how does oral diflucan work to clear up candida delite.cn clopidogrel order buy orlistat online no prescription in uk dzidzior.pl loosing weight on synthroid 75 drukarniaupi.pl interaccion de meloxicam y albuterol sulfate generic zovirax cream canada montelukast sodium generic brand montelukast 10 mg will it get you high hydrochlorothiazide and omega 3 which cause more weight gain prozac or abilify dickhopper.com fotografie-cursus.net how long do hot flashes last after stopping premarin buy zithromax pills seroquel and weight loss substitut naturel au clozapine 100 mg tablete montelukast dubai can you get high from lisinopril amlodipine 7.5 mg plendil 5 accutane uk nizoral shampoo hinta komposisi obat stromectol celibar.pl drugprevent.org.uk moduretic 25 mg and kidney stones calcium augmentin 1000 prnc.tv heavyanalytics.com is 20 mg of sildenafil equal to 100m can i take ciprotab 500mg when pregnant does taking cialis everyday wear off augmentin 1g dosage in dental harga misoprostol.cytotec.mifeprex fehmierduran.com allcoinreviews.org lifesaverpoolfencesofnevada.com avmdtogo.org face numbness with cipro effet secondaire de cytotec spacecityparent.com low free thyroxine index and thyroxine levels robertjszmidt.pl erythromycin 2 gel price hsv rash not responding to acyclovir wellbutrin body odor in nipples what does 20 mgs of furosemide tablets. cost name cheap viagra text take clomid timing and twins kegunaan clomiphene citrate hydroxyzine hcl online does propecia work at 55 years of age mobic 15 mg side effects 3 discount generic viagra can you buy bactrim over the counter ciprofloxacin azithromycin drug interactions cowinbuy.com how should i get pregnant after 5 tablets of clomid etinililestradiol para parar la menstruacion can norvasc cause pvcs cipro 400 mg flk levofloxacin for laryngitis DORREAJATETXEA.COM cattlespring.org chloramphenicol 28 days cheap tadalafil 20mg metronidazole vaginal gel usp adiconsult.pl can you use erythromycin tablets for eye stye thuoc amoxicillin 500 mg buy nexium china 555fs.com can buspar and alcohol make you crazy maxalt 2 days contraindication of malarone and glucophage xr africanamericanimages.us prnc.tv agrirobo.pl why does prednisone cause inappropriate hap 40 mg provera side effect for the skin mutien.be what is side effect of indomethacin avmdtogo.org augmentin 1 gram dr reddy amoxicillin cost lipitor 300mg can zithromax cure bacterial meningitus dickhopper.com kamagra uk next day delivery ondansetron can you get high celebrex commercial location river orlistat cost can your period be light after clomid augmentin bid 1000 mg dosage can i import thyroxine tablets into australia amoxicillin buy online cyprus can atorvastatin teva cause hearing loss aneyron.com escobar comprar misoprostol upperbe.it maanfaa amoxilin ascbelfast.com metronidazole same for dogs and humans isotretinoin 10 mg day baclofen trade names australia half life of metoprolol 50mg sr 20 mg prednisonetapering off schedule escitalopram cheer up can i buy clomid online what is the price of ciprofloxacin 500mg in nigeria does ciprofloxacin 500mg cure esophagitis ciesielstwokukulak.com.pl upperbe.it india manufacturing tamsulosin ocas college will sr prescribe viagra to 28 year old apparel-chic.com stlsoccer.net cheap price for metronidazole gel usp 0.75 is 200 mg cialis safe shapirogalvinlaw.com quetiapine fumarate 25 mg get you high 2exhibitions.com lime treatment for dogs dosage amount doxycycline septra dose for cats premarin cream side effects pills chen-liu.com neurontin dose for pain management metoprolol succinate 12.5 mg dose ivermectin for humans buy uk chemist warehouse stores sydney cost viagra ondansetron 4 mg for adults exoticguys.com stlsoccer.net how long does it take prednisone to work in dogs donde puedo encontrar cytotec en camden new jersey does meth interact with zestril 20 mg dexamethasone 4mg tablet jittery side effects ciprofloxacin 500mg can paxil 60 mg cause psychosis xn--b1afpdqbb8d.xn--p1ai rwmeierlaw.com cialis daily cost walmart clomid mercury drug ansbach-direkt.de can baby take zantac abd antibiotics can phenergan tab be sold over the counter topiramate taste augmentin 625 price in india acne capsule name tetracycline adalat for dystolic bp natural alternative to tamsulosin thyroxine sodium side effect on dry and ichy throat es08.com can i take metformin 4 times a day bt.sklep.pl doxycycline 75 mg generic terbinfine lamisil price in pune india viagra ups delivery seroquel quetiapine 1200 mg 1000 mg 800 mg 1600 mg do albuterol pills work side effect of clopidogrel 75 mg dosis buspirone how many mg do you give an 18 lb dog of levothyroxine side effects clopidogrel rashes lanoxin dose peadiatric aha levaquin and crohns fotografie-cursus.net metronidazole for pregnant women buy brand name topamax online can u takevcialis problems with blood thinners cialis before and after nizoral shampoo hong kong 4kom.it generic avodart side effects how much viagra is safe purchase inderal aquatic azithromycin for people pazarlamacadisi.com eastriverpartners.info buy finasteride online no prescription lanoxin 0.25 mg para que sirve generic vibramycin doxycycline dosage for sinus infection avmdtogo.org cytotec for sale 3mos antibiotic para sa dog bite balitoursclub.com misoprostol medicamentos mercadolibre batterymedix.com 2exhibitions.com how to drink amoxil 1000mg DORREAJATETXEA.COM 1000 mg metformin enough pcos low estrogen and zoloft ondansetron 1st trimester cowinbuy.com michelamarchiotto.com antibiotics in kuwait generic name for phenergan dm ywdtx.com how long before thyroxine takes effect in dogs buy plavix cheap dose of ciprofl fehmierduran.com fehmierduran.com how much wellbutrin sr get you high 555fs.com azithromycin 1g and uses clomid 6 months only

To: IAHF List
Subject: Article By Dr.Gaby: Safe Upper Limits for Nutritional Supplements: One Giant Step BACKWARD
From: "IAHF.COM
Date: 27 Jan 2004 21:57:13 -0000

IAHF List: Alan Gaby, MD just sent me his article (see below) which was just published in the Special Issue of the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine on the Safety and Efficacy of Vitamins. The footnotes are not included, if you require the footnotes, please order a copy of the original from JOM at http://www.orthomed.org/jom/jom.htm

I just sent this article to Dr.Antoinette Booyzen, South African Codex Delegate who as things currently stand, appears to be convinced that CRN's views on "Safe Upper Limits" are "scientific". This article refutes any such conclusion. Please forward it to your countries delegate to the UN Codex Alimentarius Commission's Committee on Nutrition and Food for Special Dietary Uses.

There is a very real danger that unless enough vitamin consumers world wide lobby against it, a grossly unscientific vitamin standard could be rushed through to completion at the next Codex meeting in November in Bonn, Germany.

I am especially concerned that pharma dominated controlled opposition groups CRN and IADSA have announced their intention to hold a political summit meeting two days before the next Codex meeting. Unless enough consumers world wide get behind ANH's legal and lobbying efforts, we won't be able to stop the pharmaceutical takeover of the natural products industry. (The CRN meeting is October 24- 27th, the CRN/IADSA Political Summit to screw the dietary supplement industry is being held October 28-29th, and the Codex meeting is the following monday, 2 days later, starting November 1st......)

Want more help in connecting the dots? Read the Cover story interview Greg Ciola did with me in the Dec/Jan issue of The Health Crusader Magazine at http://www.thehealthcrusader.com/pgs/article-0104-ban.shtml Please forward this like wildfire throughout your up and downlines if you are a network marketing distributor for any CRN member company: Mannatech, Shaklee, Herbalife, GNLD, NuSkin.

These companies have been lied to by CRN in a press release on CRN's website which proclaims that a "victory" has been won at Codex due to RDA's being scrapped in favor of so called "Safe Upper Levels" (allegedly based on "science") but Gaby's article (see below) EXPLODES that contention....

I am blown away by the naivete of such people as Sam Caster at Mannatech who has been flattered by CRN's making him a Board Member so he thinks John Hathcock at CRN is "his friend". Sam better wake up, because Hathcock used to work at FDA and might as well STILL be working at FDA, and he's NOT our friend, Gaby's article EXPLODES any contention that we can trust Hathcock's so called "scientific" risk assessment methodology, which was misextrapolated from toxicological risk assessment methodology originally intended for the evaluation of toxic pharmaceutical DRUGS and which they're MISAPPLYING to safe vitamins.

Never forget that CRN is dominated by Wyeth, Monsanto, Bayer, BASF, and Pfizer....

"Safe Upper Limits" for nutritional supplements: one giant step backward

by Alan R. Gaby, M.D.

In May, 2003, the "Expert Group on Vitamins and Minerals" (EVM), an advisory group originally commissioned in 1988 by the then Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, and subsequently reporting to the Food Standards Agency in England, published a report that set "Safe Upper Limits" (SULs) for the doses of most vitamin and mineral supplements. The establishment of SULs was based on a review of clinical and epidemiological evidence, as well as animal research and in vitro studies. For those nutrients for which the available evidence was judged insufficient to set an SUL, the EVM instead established "Guidance Levels", which were to be considered less reliable than SULs.

This writer's analysis of the EVM report reveals that the dose limits were set inappropriately low for many vitamins and minerals; well below doses which have been used by the public for decades with apparent safety. While the release of this 360-page document would be of little import, were it to be used solely as a manifesto for the pathologically risk-averse, preliminary indications are that it could be used very actively to support the arguments of those who are seeking to ban the over-the-counter sale of many currently available nutritional supplements. If the report is used that way, then the public health could be jeopardized.

On May 30, 2002, the European Union adopted Directive 2002/46/EC, which established a framework for setting maximum limits for vitamins and minerals in food supplements. The EVM report is seen by the UK government as the basis for its negotiating position in the process of setting these pan-European limits.

The apparent anti-nutritional-supplement, anti-self-care bias that permeated the process of setting safety limits is evident both in the way in which the SUL was defined and in the fact that the benefits of nutritional supplements were purposely ignored. The SUL was defined as the maximum dose of a particular nutrient "that potentially susceptible individuals could take daily on a life-long basis, without medical supervision in reasonable safety." In other words, it is the highest dose that is unlikely to cause anyone any harm, ever, under any circumstance. Furthermore, the EVM was specifically instructed not to consider the benefits of any of the nutrients, and not to engage in risk/benefit analysis.

There is little or no precedent in free societies for restricting access to products or activities to levels that are completely risk-free. Aspirin causes intestinal bleeding, water makes people drown, driving a car causes accidents, and free speech may offend the exquisitely offendable. Politicians and bureaucrats do not seek to ban aspirin or water or driving or free speech, because their benefits outweigh their risks. For vitamins and minerals, however, some authorities seem to believe that unique safety criteria are needed.

Moreover, the government's instructions to disregard the many documented benefits of nutritional supplements introduced a serious bias into the evaluation process. As the EVM acknowledged, determining safety limits involves an enormous degree of uncertainty and a fairly wide range of possible outcomes. The committee might have established higher safety limits than it did, had it been told to weigh benefits against risks. The government's instructions appeared to be an implicit directive to err on the side of excluding doses that are being used to prevent or treat disease. And that is what the EVM did, often by making questionable interpretations of the data, and doing so in what appears to have been an arbitrary and inconsistent manner.

Riboflavin Guidance Level

A typical example of the EVM's dubious approach to establishing safety limits is its evaluation of riboflavin. The committee acknowledged that no toxic effects have been reported in animals given an acute oral dose of 10,000 mg/kg of body weight, or after long-term ingestion of 25 mg/kg/day (equivalent to 1,750 mg/day for a 70-kg human). Moreover, in a study of 28 patients taking riboflavin for migraine prophylaxis, a dose of 400 mg/day for 3 months did not cause any adverse effects. Despite a complete absence of side effects at any dose in either humans or animals, the EVM set the Guidance Level for riboflavin at 40 mg/day. That level was established by dividing the 400 mg/day used in the migraine study by an "uncertainty factor" of 10, to allow for variability in the susceptibility of human beings to adverse effects.

A more appropriate conclusion regarding riboflavin would have been that no adverse effects have been observed at any dose, and that there is no basis at this time for establishing an upper limit. If the EVM's recommendation is used to limit the potency of riboflavin tablets to 40 mg, then migraine sufferers will have to take 10 pills per day, in order to prevent migraine recurrences.

Vitamin B6 Safe Upper Limit

Similar reasoning led to an SUL of 10 mg/day for vitamin B6, even though this vitamin has been used with apparent safety, usually in doses of 50 to 200 mg/day, to treat carpal tunnel syndrome, premenstrual syndrome, asthma, and other common problems. The SUL for vitamin B6 was derived from an animal study, in which a dose of 50 mg/kg of body weight/day (equivalent to 3,000 mg/day for a 60-kg person) resulted in neurotoxicity. The EVM reduced that dose progressively by invoking three separate "uncertainty factors:" 1) by a factor of 3, to extrapolate from the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) to a no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL); 2) by an additional factor of 10, to account for presumed inter-species differences; and 3) by a further factor of 10 to account for inter-individual variation in humans. Thus, the neurotoxic dose in animals was reduced by a factor of 300, to a level that excludes the widely used 50- and 100-mg tablets.

The decision to base the SUL for vitamin B6 on animal data (modified by a massive "uncertainty factor") was arbitrary, considering that toxicology data are available for humans. A sensory neuropathy has been reported in some individuals taking large doses of vitamin B6. Most people who suffered this adverse effect were taking 2,000 mg/day or more of pyridoxine, although some were taking only 500 mg/day. There is a single case report of a neuropathy occurring in a person taking 200 mg/day of pyridoxine, but the reliability of that case report is unclear. The individual in question was never examined, but was merely interviewed by telephone after responding to a local television report that publicized pyridoxine-induced neuropathy.

Because pyridoxine neurotoxicity has been known to the medical profession for 20 years, and because vitamin B6 is being taken by millions of people, it is reasonable to assume that neurotoxicity at doses below 200 mg/day would have been reported by now, if it does occur at those doses. The fact that no such reports have appeared strongly suggests that vitamin B6 does not damage the nervous system when taken at doses below 200 mg/day. As the EVM did with other nutrients for which a LOAEL is known for humans, it could have divided the vitamin B6 LOAEL (200 mg/day) by 3 to obtain an SUL of 66.7 mg/day. Had the committee been allowed to evaluate both the benefits and risks of vitamin B6, it probably would have established the SUL at that level, rather than the 10 mg/day it arrived at through serial decimation of the animal data.

Manganese Guidance Level

Chronic inhalation of high concentrations of airborne manganese, as might be encountered in mines or steel mills, has been reported to cause a neuropsychiatric syndrome that resembles Parkinson's disease. In contrast, manganese is considered one of the least toxic trace minerals when ingested orally, and reports of human toxicity from oral ingestion are "essentially nonexistent." The neurotoxicity that occurs in miners and industrial workers may result from a combination of high concentrations of manganese in the air and, possibly, direct entry of nasally inhaled manganese into the brain (bypassing the blood-brain barrier).

In establishing a Guidance Level for manganese, the EVM cited a study by Kondakis et al, in which people exposed to high concentrations of manganese in their drinking water (1.8-2.3 mg/L) had more signs and symptoms of subtle neurological dysfunction than did a control group whose drinking water contained less manganese. The committee acknowledged that another epidemiological study by Vieregge et al showed no adverse effects among individuals whose drinking water contained up to 2.1 mg/L of manganese. The EVM hypothesized that these studies may not really be contradictory, since the subjects in the Kondakis study were, on average, 10 years older than were those in the Vieregge study, and increasing age might theoretically render people more susceptible to manganese toxicity. Based on the results of these two studies, the EVM established a Guidance Level for supplemental manganese of 4 mg/day for the general population and 0.5 mg/day for elderly individuals.

There are serious problems with the EVM's analysis of the manganese research. First, the committee overlooked that fact that in the Kondakis study the people in the high-manganese group were older than were those in the control group (mean age, 67.6 vs. 65.6 years). Many of the neurological symptoms that were investigated in this study are nonspecific and presumably age related, including fatigue, muscle pain, irritability, insomnia, sleepiness, decreased libido, depression, slowness in rising from a chair, and memory disturbances. The fact that the older people had more symptoms than did the younger people is not surprising, and may have been totally unrelated to the manganese content of their drinking water.

Second, the EVM broke its own rules regarding the use of uncertainty factors, presumably to avoid being faced with an embarrassingly low Guidance Level for the general population. In setting the level at 4 mg/day, the committee stated: "No uncertainty factor is required as the NOAEL [obtained from the Vieregge study] is based on a large epidemiological study." As a point of information, the Nurses' Health Study was a large epidemiological study, enrolling more than 85,000 participants. The Beaver Dam Eye Study was a medium-sized epidemiological study, enrolling more than 3,000 participants. In contrast, in the Vieregge study, there were only 41 subjects in the high-manganese group, making it a very small epidemiological study. In its evaluation of the biotin, riboflavin, and pantothenic acid research, the EVM reduced the NOAEL by an uncertainty factor of 10, in part because only small numbers of subjects had been studied. Considering that more subjects were evaluated in the pantothenic acid research (n = 94) than in the Vieregge study (n = 41), it would seem appropriate also to use an uncertainty factor the for manganese data. Applying an uncertainty factor of 10 to the Vieregge study would have produced an absurdly low Guidance Level of 0.4 mg/day for supplemental manganese, which is well below the amount present in a typical diet (approximately 4 mg/day) and which can be obtained by drinking several sips of tea. Parenthetically, in a study of 47,351 male health professionals, drinking large amounts of tea (a major dietary source of manganese) was associated with a reduced risk of Parkinson's disease, not an increased risk. In changing its methodology to avoid reaching an indefensible conclusion, the EVM revealed the arbitrary and inconsistent nature of its evaluation process.

Niacin (nicotinic acid) Guidance Level

Large doses of niacin (such as 3,000 mg/day) can cause hepatotoxicity and other significant side effects. The EVM focused its evaluation, however, on the niacin-induced skin flush, which occurs at much lower doses. The niacin flush is a sensation of warmth on the skin, often associated with itching, burning, or irritation that occurs after the ingestion of niacin and disappears relatively quickly. It appears to be mediated in part by the release of prostaglandins. The niacin flush is not considered a toxic effect per se, and there is no evidence that it causes any harm. People who do not like the flush are free not to take niacin supplements or products that contain niacin. For those who are unaware that niacin causes a flush, an appropriate warning label on the bottle would provide adequate protection.

Granting, for the sake of argument, that the niacin flush is an adverse effect from which the public should be protected, the EVM's Guidance Level still is illogical. The committee noted that flushing is consistently observed at a dose 50 mg/day, which it established as the LOAEL. That dose was reduced by an uncertainty factor of 3, in order to extrapolate the LOAEL to a NOAEL. Thus, the Guidance Level was set at 17 mg/day, which approximates the RDA for the vitamin. The EVM also noted, however, that flushing has been reported at doses as low as 10 mg, so the true LOAEL is 10 mg/day. Applying the same uncertainty factor of 3 to the true LOAEL would have yielded a Guidance Level of a paltry 3.3 mg/day, which probably is not enough to prevent an anorexic person from developing pellagra. As with manganese, the EVM applied its methodology in an arbitrary and inconsistent manner, so as to avoid being faced with an embarrassing result.

Vitamin C Guidance Level

The EVM concluded that vitamin C does not cause significant adverse effects, although gastrointestinal (GI) side effects may occur with high doses. The committee therefore set a Guidance Level based on a NOAEL for GI side effects. It is true that taking too much vitamin C, just like eating too many apples, may cause abdominal pain or diarrhea. The dose at which vitamin C causes GI side effects varies widely from person to person, but can easily be determined by each individual. Moreover, these side effects can be eliminated by reducing the dose. Most people who take vitamin C supplements know how much they can tolerate; for those who do not, a simple warning on bottles of vitamin C would appear to provide the public all the protection it needs. Considering the many health benefits of vitamin C, attempting to dumb down the dose to a level that will prevent the last stomachache in Europe is not a worthwhile goal. However, as mentioned previously, the EVM was instructed to ignore the benefits of vitamin C.

Granting, for the sake of argument, that there is value in setting a Guidance Level for GI side effects, the EVM did a rather poor job of setting that level. The committee established the LOAEL at 3,000 mg/day, based on a study of a small number of normal volunteers. An uncertainty factor of 3 was used to extrapolate from the LOAEL to a NOAEL, resulting in a Guidance Level of 1,000 mg/day. However, anyone practicing nutritional medicine knows that some patients experience abdominal pain or diarrhea at vitamin C doses of 1,000 mg/day or less, and the EVM did acknowledge that GI side effects have been reported at doses of 1,000 mg. It is disingenuous to set a NOAEL and then to concede that effects do occur at the no-effect level. To be consistent with the methodology it used for other nutrients, the committee should have set the LOAEL at 1,000 mg/day, and reduced it by a factor of 3 to arrive at a NOAEL of 333 mg/day. The EVM was no doubt aware of the credibility problems it would have faced, had it suggested that half the world is currently overdosing on vitamin C. To resolve its dilemma, the committee used a scientifically unjustifiable route to arrive at a seemingly politically expedient outcome.

Conclusion

These and other examples from the report demonstrate that the EVM applied its methodology in an arbitrary and inconsistent manner, in arriving at "safety" recommendations that are excessively and inappropriately restrictive. While the directive to evaluate only the risks, and to ignore the benefits, of nutritional supplements created a rigged game, the members of the EVM appeared to be willing participants in that game.

If the EVM report is used to relegate currently available nutritional supplements to prescription-only status, then millions of people would be harmed, and very few would benefit. It would be of little consolation that the higher doses of vitamins and minerals could still be obtained with a doctor's prescription, because most doctors know less about nutrition than many of their patients do. Moreover, the overburdened health-care system is in no position to take on the job of gatekeeper of the vitamin cabinet; nor is there any need for it to do so.

Ironically, as flawed as the EVM report is, its recommendations may ultimately prove to be "as good as it gets" in Europe. Other European countries are recommending that maximum permitted levels be directly linked to multiples of the RDA, which could result in limits for some nutrients being set substantially lower than those suggested in the EVM report.

While some nutritional supplements can cause adverse effects in certain clinical situations or at certain doses, appropriate warning labels on vitamin and mineral products would provide ample protection against most of those risks.

Note: Reprinted with permission from the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine (in press), as part of a special issue devoted to clearing up the confusion about the toxicity of vitamins.

For Health Freedom,
John C. Hammell, President
International Advocates for Health Freedom
556 Boundary Bay Road
Point Roberts, WA 98281-8702 USA
http://www.iahf.com
jham@iahf.com
800-333-2553 N.America
360-945-0352 World