uso de viagra em excesso caber vs nolvadex how to get off of metformin womans viagra for sale cytotec early does ciprofloxacin treat trichomoniasis proscar covered can prednisone cause breast swelling does azithromycin treat epididymitis peyronies disease and viagra buy cheap cialis no rx ciprofloxacin 500 mg patient information leaflet does tamsulosin affect fertility sinntomas de la pastilla misoprostol levothyroxine tablets without lactose legit online pharmacy viagra can i take hydrocodone while taking prednisone lopressor and alcohol withdrawal buy zyprexa 5mg uk bactrim ds in 2nd trimester cinfa amoxicillina chad oppenheim villa allegra does lexapro get you sleepy taking ventolin on a plane ventolin 90 mcg price prozac propecia interaction clomiphene 25 shrine order acyclovir online why does viagra make you tired seroquel overdose risks methocarbamol argentino cabergoline en zwangerschap warfarin amoxicillin drug interaction celexa withdrawal numbness ciprofloxacina dosaggio pediatrico como tomar allegra 120 take augmentin with alcohol buying prednisone for dogs online clozapine 100 mg tablets allegra geschenkwerkstatt gmbh wellbutrin fda recall small bleeding after taking cytotec propecia blood sugar zovirax 800 used can i take nurofen while taking amoxicillin lexapro oral uses zovirax for shingles dose proscar yeast infection inspiron 10 mg montelukast abracadabra 151 and coke is viagra does viagra help your heart how fast does zithromax liquid cure chlamydia aripiprazole price in usa ciproxin 500 mg hr om fungsi obat dexamethasone da dexclorpheniramine maleate clomid period test uso ivermectina en cachorros will prednisone affect a pregnancy test ofloxacin sty el ciprofloxacino tazac versus nexium contraceptive pill contraindications with clomid doxycycline cross reactivity lisinopril urine protein can metronidazole turn urine brown valtrex cold sore directions cifox 500 mg tabs ciprofloxacin apotik jual accutane avvocato massimo allegra drug reactions to cymbalta customer review diet pill zyban brand of bupropion anafranil flebo tadalafil 20 benifit wellbutrin for joint pain equivalence burinex lasix i am on my second round of clomid how long can a person take zoloft decvelped rash after long term use of lisinopril image valtrex pill what chemical gives energy in prednisone abilify tricyclic antidepressant can teenager take viagra tamoxifen metro amlodipine amm propecia with rogain for 10 years comparativa cialis levitra ciprofloxacino 500 para gonorrea lasix in preeclampsia best way to come off wellbutrin lexapro vomit clomiphene for women side effects la sertralina zoloft intoxicacion con tamoxifeno natural female viagra pills why does acne get worse while on accutane can you get a prescription for viagra from a clinic paxil side effects for elderly nexium pliculete pt copii losartan lisinopril equivalent conseguir cytotec venezuela does viagra make my penus bigger best viagra in manila septra side effects rash amoxicillin 500mg for sale without viagra gone bad mobicam 70060 metoprolol succinate retard trailer viagra chinese viagra headache stop singulair before allergy testing reteta tadalafil clomid e colon irritabile valacyclovir 1 gm metformin explained can i get high on neurontin tagliare in due il viagra baclofen pupils rio vers mobicarte effects clomiphene citrate menstrual cycle doxycycline hyc face como dejar escitalopram proscar minoxidil hair loss buy cheap viagra online now drug group ventolin compare lipitor to zocor tetracycline with milk products rogaine propecia success successful abortion with misoprostol allegra inactive ingredients grapefruit and metoprolol nexium iv impurities zyprexa wanneer gaat het werken bula de medicamento keflex bactrim antibiotics for acne viagra with vaccuum ondansetron in alcoholics pantyhose vs viagra topamax haaruitval pagina principal de xenical ibuprofen methocarbamol interaction ventolin inhalacija harga obat bactrim forte viagra wat doet het priligy rj diflucan for cats lowest price kamagra gel ingredients gabapentin mental status changes flagyl msds acne medication doxycycline dosage taking nolvadex on plane buy doxycycline in us for dog lasix and co2 pregabalin ve gabapentin neuropathic pain spironolactone acetaminophen interactions price of ventolin in australia what pill works like viagra can i eat cranberry while taking thyroxine not losing weight on xenical herbs not to take with plavix dosage of zithromax for gastroperisis zovirax iv spc is xenical good dosaggio ventolin ev blue lisinopril generic is aripiprazole a steroid how to tell if ventolin inhaler is empty amoxicillin help fever metformin and humulin r misoprostol ductus arteriosus avodart e psa free azithromycin ranbaxy india what are the long term effects of celebrex how to prevent acne after accutane amlodipine besylate perindopril how long after taking misoprostol can i breastfeed puedo tomar metformina y orlistat juntos zoloft light periods metoprolol er succinate mfg watson coversyl vs adalat lethal dosage of lisinopril with viagra can you keep going after ejaclation viagra sur ordonnance en pharmacie disadvantage of sildenafil citrate aciclovir t?pico chile nexium mups dose what is nexium mups 20 mg indapamide 1.5mg ovulate 1 day after clomid prednisone treatment for pericarditis sr xr wellbutrin side effects of too much zyprexa chest pain while on prednisone side effects of missed dose of lexapro spironolactone acne side effects weight loss topiramate missed dose diet tea pills when to take pregnancy test while on clomid is viagra at walmart finasteride and prostate enlargement and hair loss 4 x 4 viagra 3 pills of diflucan male yeast infection i viagra vitsi norvasc hypotension will azithromycin affect depo shot tamoxifeno interaccion medicamentos metformin use in pregnancy and lactation doxazosina y levitra singulair prospect 10mg zoloft 5mg prices in greece is topiramate used to treat anxiety how hard is it to get prescribed viagra reviews on female cialis nolvadex for letro rebound solian vs abilify the viagra pill for women thyroxine drug food interactions does doxycycline hyclate go bad will amoxicillin treat a fever blister albuterol inhaler side effects use lisinopril hctz rash cephalexin im red estop e clomid levothyroxine doses for weight loss is acyclovir toxic long term maxalto mida prezzo viagra loosing potency seroquel xr pubmed propecia bladder pain excel viagra review generic name of clomid 5 weeks sertraline estrell estradiol bula allegra additive ampulle recommended dosage azithromycin 500 seroquel wassereinlagerungen robaxin the same as soma dread shed from spironolactone can you buy viagra in caymans acute coronary syndrome plavix dose doxycycline dosage 400mg for dogs can glucophage help you lose weight viagra chilote nolvadex under testo kur is amoxicillin good for fever metronidazole in pigeons metronidazole puppies age vardenafil side effects 20mg does zithromax work if crushed efficacia del viagra generico metronidazole after root canal lipitor xalatan prescription for flagyl when will generic viagras be available accutane dry eye side effects prednisone prescribed for hives metoprolol ptsd why no generic lexapro clomid mestruazioni anticipate genuine viagra in thailand fluconazole 150 mg for yeast infection amoxicillin pain worse teva clopidogrel prescription coupons online clomid pct after sustanon clomid da colica ciprofloxacina o norfloxacina amoxicillin how fast estrace vs synthroid is prednisone sun sensitivity nsaids taken with metformin er erythromycin salbe handelsname buspar for bruxism lexapro dosing vs. zoloft dosing tamoxifen genox 20 dose of ciprofloxacin in paediatrics can i take theraflu with synthroid dexamethasone .75 for pain paxil master cleanse does redbull interact with azithromycin 0.5 mg propecia results is allegra ok to take during pregnancy synthroid side levothyroxine na 0.05mg iud insertion with misoprostol nz cytotec abortion what to expect isotretinoina centrum can you take macrobid and nexium fluconazole 150mg reviews symptons worse cabergoline steroid viagra generic aurveda can take ciprofloxacin while pregnant ohra strattera importance of tetracycline cuales son las reacciones del viagra zyprexa ansiedad 10 mg lisinopril by lupin for sale lipitor to buy online generic for cymbalta 20mg misoprostol efecte adverse tadalafil from india reviews how soon after prednisone can i drink whats best lesofat or xenical misoprostol tiempo de absorcion buy amoxicillin 500 mg tablets xenical causa rebote cialis buy in belfast bar el ventolin estradiol tablets in pregnancy for how many years viagra works ciprofloxacino otico nombre comercial dutasteride gabapentin withdrawal rls can u have erection problems aftertaking 1 viagra atorvastatin lowest price accutane in cancer que es el xenical y para que sirve od wellbutrin buy nolvadex pay pall europe cialis side effects of the eyes allegra murphy denton something similar to viagra over the counter yogurt prednisone can cialis cause impotence zyprexa zydis presentaciones espanol cialis 40 mg quel dosage invigorating face wash neutrogena deltasone ati oxytetracycline preparation seroquel efficace fda levaquin plague pueden fallar las pastillas cytotec remedio kamagra prednisone dose for respiratory infection buy terbinafine hydrochloride 1 cream 30gm uk can i take cold and flu tablets with zoloft topamax and dental side effects propecia ad lexapro 60 mg zofran pulled from market viagra herstellen misoprostol gastric ph clomid 150 mg alternate with 100mg viagra femme buy viagra online best pharmacy nexium astrazeneca pharmaceuticals how spironolactone works for acne dostinex si sarcina metformin makes me so sick zoloft rapid heart rate posologie metronidazole comprim furosemide aman untuk ibu hamil xenical online in topiramate 40 mg lisinopril sale metformin pubmed health estrace for frozen embryo transfer standard dosage for lipitor headache on topamax para que es bactrim compositum xenical much fat prednisone early period what age can you give phenergan ipratropium bromide inhalation solution vs albuterol vendo cialis 20 mg does lexapro make you eat more xr seroquel gabapentin ischialgie ivermectina caprini generico do viagra principio ativo mousre in box of viagra albuterol inhaler before workout cymbalta and metabolism proscar or finpecia apa yang di maksud cialis danger black cialis como debo tomar cytotec para abortar cialis cost singapore doctor vardenafil off patent forzest tadacip viagra vs levitra price how much bo clopidogrel tablets cost baclofen koorts synthroid use and breast cancer atarax for babies with eczema wellbutrin miscarriage neurontin congenital nystagmus possible side effects from bactrim propranolol nombre comercial en venezuela how do you stake orlistat cialis necesita recipe en venezuela propecia infertilita can viagra be taken if you are on warfarin whats the difference between 5mg and 20mg cialis have they stopped making tetracycline truth about lexapro ciprofloxacin achillessehne therapie augmentin hypokalemia metropolitana fermata cipro roma will metformin denk 500 make me get pregnant terra viagra amitriptyline dose headache singulair works well can i take vitamins while taking augmentin para que sirve el medicamento aldactone 100mg 15mg zovirax days supply cholesterol medicijnen lipitor bupropion aphasia how many times a day should i take neurontin can you get high from indomethacin does wellbutrin contain amphetamines dostinex pentru oprirea lactatiei mary kay skinvigorate cleansing brush review generic of cipro prednisone yorkies genetiese vir viagra estradiol 586 cephalexin cause bad breath para ques paroxetine hcl 40 mg tabl is celexa safe in pregnancy how long does prednisone affect your body levitra 20 mg quanto costa propranolol effects powered by disqus generic viagra sildenafil azithromycin sore tongue can i take excedrin migraine with lexapro what is neurontin for metformin and afib lasix efficacy gravidas podem tomar allegra side effects of using xenical will clomid help me get pregnant at 45 how much does medicare pays for cialis atenolol side effects swelling order tinidazole hereisthebestin zithromax after surgery escitalopram pmdd pack insert bali customs restrictions viagra baclofen intrathecal pump ile kosztuje nizoral w saszetkach can i get xenical on the nhs metronidazole benzoate poultry is it safe to masturbate while u are on finasteride cytotec zur einleitung can you take viagra young tratamento de fertilidade com clomid clopidogrel ticlopidine prasugrel cialis, aturan pakai adalat drama sony tv 11 june viagra thrombosis metformin renal failure dosing aciclovir pastillas para herpes labial prednisone 60 mg for three days tetracycline bacteria concentration metoprolol succinate vs toprol xl fluconazole 300 mg daily cipla cialis forum does furosemide cause swelling buy cialis for women in singapore azithromycin during pregnancy acyclovir lab values olanzapine side effects hallucinations nizoral in costco remedio parecido com o viagra generic plavix new york times who has the best generic viagra levaquin for mycoplasma pneumonia misoprostol tablets came out singulair msd dieckmann association amoxicilline metronidazole valtrex complete list of side effects verschil xenical alli abilify double vision how to apply ketoconazole shampoo for tinea versicolor can i take 2 pills of cialis in one day qual o custo do viagra knee problems from cipro can you drink whilst on acyclovir ciprofloxacin eye drops for dogs side effects mrsa resistant to bactrim cut 20mg levitra in fourths 1 ketoconazole cream montelukast sandoz 4 mg granulat can acyclovir treat chlamydia lasix 40 mg online classification of cialis zofran infants dosage cymbalta withdrawal time uk online viagra pharmacy mi manda rai 3 finasteride evista 60 mg indication how long does a guy erect for with viagra can you cut viagra 100mg metronidazole treats what prednisone kitten dose acyclovir cream for herpetic whitlow entourage better than cialis per cialis serve ricetta medica seroquel zyprexa interactions is ciprofloxacin hcl effective after its discard date

To: IAHF List
Subject: Article By Dr.Gaby: Safe Upper Limits for Nutritional Supplements: One Giant Step BACKWARD
Date: 27 Jan 2004 21:57:13 -0000

IAHF List: Alan Gaby, MD just sent me his article (see below) which was just published in the Special Issue of the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine on the Safety and Efficacy of Vitamins. The footnotes are not included, if you require the footnotes, please order a copy of the original from JOM at

I just sent this article to Dr.Antoinette Booyzen, South African Codex Delegate who as things currently stand, appears to be convinced that CRN's views on "Safe Upper Limits" are "scientific". This article refutes any such conclusion. Please forward it to your countries delegate to the UN Codex Alimentarius Commission's Committee on Nutrition and Food for Special Dietary Uses.

There is a very real danger that unless enough vitamin consumers world wide lobby against it, a grossly unscientific vitamin standard could be rushed through to completion at the next Codex meeting in November in Bonn, Germany.

I am especially concerned that pharma dominated controlled opposition groups CRN and IADSA have announced their intention to hold a political summit meeting two days before the next Codex meeting. Unless enough consumers world wide get behind ANH's legal and lobbying efforts, we won't be able to stop the pharmaceutical takeover of the natural products industry. (The CRN meeting is October 24- 27th, the CRN/IADSA Political Summit to screw the dietary supplement industry is being held October 28-29th, and the Codex meeting is the following monday, 2 days later, starting November 1st......)

Want more help in connecting the dots? Read the Cover story interview Greg Ciola did with me in the Dec/Jan issue of The Health Crusader Magazine at Please forward this like wildfire throughout your up and downlines if you are a network marketing distributor for any CRN member company: Mannatech, Shaklee, Herbalife, GNLD, NuSkin.

These companies have been lied to by CRN in a press release on CRN's website which proclaims that a "victory" has been won at Codex due to RDA's being scrapped in favor of so called "Safe Upper Levels" (allegedly based on "science") but Gaby's article (see below) EXPLODES that contention....

I am blown away by the naivete of such people as Sam Caster at Mannatech who has been flattered by CRN's making him a Board Member so he thinks John Hathcock at CRN is "his friend". Sam better wake up, because Hathcock used to work at FDA and might as well STILL be working at FDA, and he's NOT our friend, Gaby's article EXPLODES any contention that we can trust Hathcock's so called "scientific" risk assessment methodology, which was misextrapolated from toxicological risk assessment methodology originally intended for the evaluation of toxic pharmaceutical DRUGS and which they're MISAPPLYING to safe vitamins.

Never forget that CRN is dominated by Wyeth, Monsanto, Bayer, BASF, and Pfizer....

"Safe Upper Limits" for nutritional supplements: one giant step backward

by Alan R. Gaby, M.D.

In May, 2003, the "Expert Group on Vitamins and Minerals" (EVM), an advisory group originally commissioned in 1988 by the then Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, and subsequently reporting to the Food Standards Agency in England, published a report that set "Safe Upper Limits" (SULs) for the doses of most vitamin and mineral supplements. The establishment of SULs was based on a review of clinical and epidemiological evidence, as well as animal research and in vitro studies. For those nutrients for which the available evidence was judged insufficient to set an SUL, the EVM instead established "Guidance Levels", which were to be considered less reliable than SULs.

This writer's analysis of the EVM report reveals that the dose limits were set inappropriately low for many vitamins and minerals; well below doses which have been used by the public for decades with apparent safety. While the release of this 360-page document would be of little import, were it to be used solely as a manifesto for the pathologically risk-averse, preliminary indications are that it could be used very actively to support the arguments of those who are seeking to ban the over-the-counter sale of many currently available nutritional supplements. If the report is used that way, then the public health could be jeopardized.

On May 30, 2002, the European Union adopted Directive 2002/46/EC, which established a framework for setting maximum limits for vitamins and minerals in food supplements. The EVM report is seen by the UK government as the basis for its negotiating position in the process of setting these pan-European limits.

The apparent anti-nutritional-supplement, anti-self-care bias that permeated the process of setting safety limits is evident both in the way in which the SUL was defined and in the fact that the benefits of nutritional supplements were purposely ignored. The SUL was defined as the maximum dose of a particular nutrient "that potentially susceptible individuals could take daily on a life-long basis, without medical supervision in reasonable safety." In other words, it is the highest dose that is unlikely to cause anyone any harm, ever, under any circumstance. Furthermore, the EVM was specifically instructed not to consider the benefits of any of the nutrients, and not to engage in risk/benefit analysis.

There is little or no precedent in free societies for restricting access to products or activities to levels that are completely risk-free. Aspirin causes intestinal bleeding, water makes people drown, driving a car causes accidents, and free speech may offend the exquisitely offendable. Politicians and bureaucrats do not seek to ban aspirin or water or driving or free speech, because their benefits outweigh their risks. For vitamins and minerals, however, some authorities seem to believe that unique safety criteria are needed.

Moreover, the government's instructions to disregard the many documented benefits of nutritional supplements introduced a serious bias into the evaluation process. As the EVM acknowledged, determining safety limits involves an enormous degree of uncertainty and a fairly wide range of possible outcomes. The committee might have established higher safety limits than it did, had it been told to weigh benefits against risks. The government's instructions appeared to be an implicit directive to err on the side of excluding doses that are being used to prevent or treat disease. And that is what the EVM did, often by making questionable interpretations of the data, and doing so in what appears to have been an arbitrary and inconsistent manner.

Riboflavin Guidance Level

A typical example of the EVM's dubious approach to establishing safety limits is its evaluation of riboflavin. The committee acknowledged that no toxic effects have been reported in animals given an acute oral dose of 10,000 mg/kg of body weight, or after long-term ingestion of 25 mg/kg/day (equivalent to 1,750 mg/day for a 70-kg human). Moreover, in a study of 28 patients taking riboflavin for migraine prophylaxis, a dose of 400 mg/day for 3 months did not cause any adverse effects. Despite a complete absence of side effects at any dose in either humans or animals, the EVM set the Guidance Level for riboflavin at 40 mg/day. That level was established by dividing the 400 mg/day used in the migraine study by an "uncertainty factor" of 10, to allow for variability in the susceptibility of human beings to adverse effects.

A more appropriate conclusion regarding riboflavin would have been that no adverse effects have been observed at any dose, and that there is no basis at this time for establishing an upper limit. If the EVM's recommendation is used to limit the potency of riboflavin tablets to 40 mg, then migraine sufferers will have to take 10 pills per day, in order to prevent migraine recurrences.

Vitamin B6 Safe Upper Limit

Similar reasoning led to an SUL of 10 mg/day for vitamin B6, even though this vitamin has been used with apparent safety, usually in doses of 50 to 200 mg/day, to treat carpal tunnel syndrome, premenstrual syndrome, asthma, and other common problems. The SUL for vitamin B6 was derived from an animal study, in which a dose of 50 mg/kg of body weight/day (equivalent to 3,000 mg/day for a 60-kg person) resulted in neurotoxicity. The EVM reduced that dose progressively by invoking three separate "uncertainty factors:" 1) by a factor of 3, to extrapolate from the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) to a no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL); 2) by an additional factor of 10, to account for presumed inter-species differences; and 3) by a further factor of 10 to account for inter-individual variation in humans. Thus, the neurotoxic dose in animals was reduced by a factor of 300, to a level that excludes the widely used 50- and 100-mg tablets.

The decision to base the SUL for vitamin B6 on animal data (modified by a massive "uncertainty factor") was arbitrary, considering that toxicology data are available for humans. A sensory neuropathy has been reported in some individuals taking large doses of vitamin B6. Most people who suffered this adverse effect were taking 2,000 mg/day or more of pyridoxine, although some were taking only 500 mg/day. There is a single case report of a neuropathy occurring in a person taking 200 mg/day of pyridoxine, but the reliability of that case report is unclear. The individual in question was never examined, but was merely interviewed by telephone after responding to a local television report that publicized pyridoxine-induced neuropathy.

Because pyridoxine neurotoxicity has been known to the medical profession for 20 years, and because vitamin B6 is being taken by millions of people, it is reasonable to assume that neurotoxicity at doses below 200 mg/day would have been reported by now, if it does occur at those doses. The fact that no such reports have appeared strongly suggests that vitamin B6 does not damage the nervous system when taken at doses below 200 mg/day. As the EVM did with other nutrients for which a LOAEL is known for humans, it could have divided the vitamin B6 LOAEL (200 mg/day) by 3 to obtain an SUL of 66.7 mg/day. Had the committee been allowed to evaluate both the benefits and risks of vitamin B6, it probably would have established the SUL at that level, rather than the 10 mg/day it arrived at through serial decimation of the animal data.

Manganese Guidance Level

Chronic inhalation of high concentrations of airborne manganese, as might be encountered in mines or steel mills, has been reported to cause a neuropsychiatric syndrome that resembles Parkinson's disease. In contrast, manganese is considered one of the least toxic trace minerals when ingested orally, and reports of human toxicity from oral ingestion are "essentially nonexistent." The neurotoxicity that occurs in miners and industrial workers may result from a combination of high concentrations of manganese in the air and, possibly, direct entry of nasally inhaled manganese into the brain (bypassing the blood-brain barrier).

In establishing a Guidance Level for manganese, the EVM cited a study by Kondakis et al, in which people exposed to high concentrations of manganese in their drinking water (1.8-2.3 mg/L) had more signs and symptoms of subtle neurological dysfunction than did a control group whose drinking water contained less manganese. The committee acknowledged that another epidemiological study by Vieregge et al showed no adverse effects among individuals whose drinking water contained up to 2.1 mg/L of manganese. The EVM hypothesized that these studies may not really be contradictory, since the subjects in the Kondakis study were, on average, 10 years older than were those in the Vieregge study, and increasing age might theoretically render people more susceptible to manganese toxicity. Based on the results of these two studies, the EVM established a Guidance Level for supplemental manganese of 4 mg/day for the general population and 0.5 mg/day for elderly individuals.

There are serious problems with the EVM's analysis of the manganese research. First, the committee overlooked that fact that in the Kondakis study the people in the high-manganese group were older than were those in the control group (mean age, 67.6 vs. 65.6 years). Many of the neurological symptoms that were investigated in this study are nonspecific and presumably age related, including fatigue, muscle pain, irritability, insomnia, sleepiness, decreased libido, depression, slowness in rising from a chair, and memory disturbances. The fact that the older people had more symptoms than did the younger people is not surprising, and may have been totally unrelated to the manganese content of their drinking water.

Second, the EVM broke its own rules regarding the use of uncertainty factors, presumably to avoid being faced with an embarrassingly low Guidance Level for the general population. In setting the level at 4 mg/day, the committee stated: "No uncertainty factor is required as the NOAEL [obtained from the Vieregge study] is based on a large epidemiological study." As a point of information, the Nurses' Health Study was a large epidemiological study, enrolling more than 85,000 participants. The Beaver Dam Eye Study was a medium-sized epidemiological study, enrolling more than 3,000 participants. In contrast, in the Vieregge study, there were only 41 subjects in the high-manganese group, making it a very small epidemiological study. In its evaluation of the biotin, riboflavin, and pantothenic acid research, the EVM reduced the NOAEL by an uncertainty factor of 10, in part because only small numbers of subjects had been studied. Considering that more subjects were evaluated in the pantothenic acid research (n = 94) than in the Vieregge study (n = 41), it would seem appropriate also to use an uncertainty factor the for manganese data. Applying an uncertainty factor of 10 to the Vieregge study would have produced an absurdly low Guidance Level of 0.4 mg/day for supplemental manganese, which is well below the amount present in a typical diet (approximately 4 mg/day) and which can be obtained by drinking several sips of tea. Parenthetically, in a study of 47,351 male health professionals, drinking large amounts of tea (a major dietary source of manganese) was associated with a reduced risk of Parkinson's disease, not an increased risk. In changing its methodology to avoid reaching an indefensible conclusion, the EVM revealed the arbitrary and inconsistent nature of its evaluation process.

Niacin (nicotinic acid) Guidance Level

Large doses of niacin (such as 3,000 mg/day) can cause hepatotoxicity and other significant side effects. The EVM focused its evaluation, however, on the niacin-induced skin flush, which occurs at much lower doses. The niacin flush is a sensation of warmth on the skin, often associated with itching, burning, or irritation that occurs after the ingestion of niacin and disappears relatively quickly. It appears to be mediated in part by the release of prostaglandins. The niacin flush is not considered a toxic effect per se, and there is no evidence that it causes any harm. People who do not like the flush are free not to take niacin supplements or products that contain niacin. For those who are unaware that niacin causes a flush, an appropriate warning label on the bottle would provide adequate protection.

Granting, for the sake of argument, that the niacin flush is an adverse effect from which the public should be protected, the EVM's Guidance Level still is illogical. The committee noted that flushing is consistently observed at a dose 50 mg/day, which it established as the LOAEL. That dose was reduced by an uncertainty factor of 3, in order to extrapolate the LOAEL to a NOAEL. Thus, the Guidance Level was set at 17 mg/day, which approximates the RDA for the vitamin. The EVM also noted, however, that flushing has been reported at doses as low as 10 mg, so the true LOAEL is 10 mg/day. Applying the same uncertainty factor of 3 to the true LOAEL would have yielded a Guidance Level of a paltry 3.3 mg/day, which probably is not enough to prevent an anorexic person from developing pellagra. As with manganese, the EVM applied its methodology in an arbitrary and inconsistent manner, so as to avoid being faced with an embarrassing result.

Vitamin C Guidance Level

The EVM concluded that vitamin C does not cause significant adverse effects, although gastrointestinal (GI) side effects may occur with high doses. The committee therefore set a Guidance Level based on a NOAEL for GI side effects. It is true that taking too much vitamin C, just like eating too many apples, may cause abdominal pain or diarrhea. The dose at which vitamin C causes GI side effects varies widely from person to person, but can easily be determined by each individual. Moreover, these side effects can be eliminated by reducing the dose. Most people who take vitamin C supplements know how much they can tolerate; for those who do not, a simple warning on bottles of vitamin C would appear to provide the public all the protection it needs. Considering the many health benefits of vitamin C, attempting to dumb down the dose to a level that will prevent the last stomachache in Europe is not a worthwhile goal. However, as mentioned previously, the EVM was instructed to ignore the benefits of vitamin C.

Granting, for the sake of argument, that there is value in setting a Guidance Level for GI side effects, the EVM did a rather poor job of setting that level. The committee established the LOAEL at 3,000 mg/day, based on a study of a small number of normal volunteers. An uncertainty factor of 3 was used to extrapolate from the LOAEL to a NOAEL, resulting in a Guidance Level of 1,000 mg/day. However, anyone practicing nutritional medicine knows that some patients experience abdominal pain or diarrhea at vitamin C doses of 1,000 mg/day or less, and the EVM did acknowledge that GI side effects have been reported at doses of 1,000 mg. It is disingenuous to set a NOAEL and then to concede that effects do occur at the no-effect level. To be consistent with the methodology it used for other nutrients, the committee should have set the LOAEL at 1,000 mg/day, and reduced it by a factor of 3 to arrive at a NOAEL of 333 mg/day. The EVM was no doubt aware of the credibility problems it would have faced, had it suggested that half the world is currently overdosing on vitamin C. To resolve its dilemma, the committee used a scientifically unjustifiable route to arrive at a seemingly politically expedient outcome.


These and other examples from the report demonstrate that the EVM applied its methodology in an arbitrary and inconsistent manner, in arriving at "safety" recommendations that are excessively and inappropriately restrictive. While the directive to evaluate only the risks, and to ignore the benefits, of nutritional supplements created a rigged game, the members of the EVM appeared to be willing participants in that game.

If the EVM report is used to relegate currently available nutritional supplements to prescription-only status, then millions of people would be harmed, and very few would benefit. It would be of little consolation that the higher doses of vitamins and minerals could still be obtained with a doctor's prescription, because most doctors know less about nutrition than many of their patients do. Moreover, the overburdened health-care system is in no position to take on the job of gatekeeper of the vitamin cabinet; nor is there any need for it to do so.

Ironically, as flawed as the EVM report is, its recommendations may ultimately prove to be "as good as it gets" in Europe. Other European countries are recommending that maximum permitted levels be directly linked to multiples of the RDA, which could result in limits for some nutrients being set substantially lower than those suggested in the EVM report.

While some nutritional supplements can cause adverse effects in certain clinical situations or at certain doses, appropriate warning labels on vitamin and mineral products would provide ample protection against most of those risks.

Note: Reprinted with permission from the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine (in press), as part of a special issue devoted to clearing up the confusion about the toxicity of vitamins.

For Health Freedom,
John C. Hammell, President
International Advocates for Health Freedom
556 Boundary Bay Road
Point Roberts, WA 98281-8702 USA
800-333-2553 N.America
360-945-0352 World