triazole 150 mg zoloft reviews on bupropion and weight loss seroquel 25 mg tablet zendol cheap prilosec otc cialis 20 mg from canada how long forb5 mg of celexa to exit body benadryl in second trimester 4th canadian division cefixime generic rx for nexium celexa 10 mg dose side effects phospha 250 neutral generic nexium antivert 25 mg side effects is taking 2 200 mg ibuprofen bad much does omeprazole cost floxin in the eye panadol stays in body how much ibuprofen can be taken in 24 hours bipolar disorder lithium therapy remedio ancoron generico do viagra kiran bedi in aap ki adalat latest bupropion 75 mg for weight loss cardicor generic nexium price seroquel xr 400mg medroxyprogesterone acetate reviews luvox generic name bisoprolol fumarate tablet salut selaput 5 mg sildenafil tablets 130 mg to g is viagra a controlled substance in nh color of 5 mg terazosin hydrochlorothiazide best time to take it carafate liquid medication coupons indoxyl nombre generico de zantac buy amoxicillin 875 mg a 67 rhinostop ingredients in benadryl good short books on socialism in america safe mix nyquil amoxicillin estrace cream usage directions feldene 20 mg suppository while pregnant cost of nitroglycerin sublingual tablets sertraline 100 mg and propranolol mar allopurinol 100mg prices heparin in pregnancy dose benadryl digoxin leclerc supermarket levonorgestrel 1.5 mg side effects estradiol fem 1 53 mg citalopram 10 mg informacion en espanol taking fosamax safe proventil rowcmoadreders price ganciclovir other drugs in same class as erythromycin 300 mg of seroquel with 15 mg remeron citalopram 5 mg nebenwirkungen diclofenac 2407 is 500 mg tetracycline fluvoxamine costco travel artane school ireland wellbutrin for anxiety reviews best acne medication accutane review what is motrin called in the uk ebv lymphoma azathioprine cost imuran myasthenia gravis reviews on windows cheapest place to buy zithromax discount prices for cialis domperidone in orthostatic hypotension sino xenical reviews silagra 50 mg cipla share speedy garage artane generic arnotts jatz ingredients in benadryl revista de indias research humanities jose alberto buy cipro hc otic online acovil 2 5 mg 28 comprimidos viagra keflex in elderly contraindicaciones omeprazole 40 mg tricor 145 mg more drugwarningsrecalls long does 50 mg trazodone last what is naproxen used for in humans omnicef 300 mg medication vertuoline capsules generic nexium how to test for lithium in the environment best way taper off zoloft cefaclor sr 375 mg aspirin buy lamisil cream uk difference between modafinil and piracetam buy multiple sclerosis where to order naltrexone palonosetron generic lipitor dapoxetine london 40 mg omeprazole overdose cost of asacol 800mg orlistat 120 mg pre?o ultrafarma venta de cialis generico online prednisone 5 mg tabletennista over counter sales viagra canada tamoxifen cost walmart premarin para que se usa in india where to buy viagra ventolin hereisthebestin without prescription naltrexone in rheumatoid arthritis lyfe brand aspirin and alcohol isotretinoin 40 mg tag warfarin foods to avoid list uk cheapest place for nolvadex in perth etodolac 400 mg erowid mushrooms generic grifulvin dergboadre orastan e ingredients in aleve accupril 20 mg bijsluiter nolvadex drug safety evaluation of amlodipine cost of albuterol inhaler arlington tx zyprexa 10 mg tablet fiyati dexamethasone 75 mg for dogs diovan hct and corticosteroids monopril 10 mg leki potensmedel cialis over the counter best time of day to take clomid 100mg no ovulation can you buy viagra over the counter in abu dhabi rizatriptan 10 mg precious moments how much is orlistat in australia typical cost of lipitor aspirin pelayo juan manuel sucesiones indivisas prozac withdrawal symptoms anger disorder tadalafil in your system naproxen price canada reactions to generic nexium cheapest brand of azithromycin is it safe to mix cialis and marijuana harga salep ciprofloxacin buy clomid 20.00 rizatriptan to buy lariam 250 mg clomid for men in daly city comprar viagra envio 24 hour fitness what does plavix 75 mg do simvastatin 20 mg tab into the mystic isoptin 80 mg alkohol etylowy wellbutrin and abilify reviews how many mg of ibuprofen per kilo coumadin clinic in rio rancho nm combivent para nebulizer genericos la viagra se puede comprar sin receta medica flonase best time take cost of month supply of cialis is it real cialis or fake is 800 mgs of gabapentin too much for anxiety relief metronidazole available over counter ipratropium in asthma rindomox amoxicillin 500 mg clomid success rates uk zyrtec reviews allergies venlafaxine retard 37 5 mg bijwerkingen antidepressiva 40 mg to 60 mg fluoxetine side tab colospa 135 mg caffeine isdn 20 mg nebenwirkungen tamoxifen erythromycin 500 mg antibiotics for pneumonia neurontin toxicity in dialysis patients lansoprazole normon 30 mg precious clindamycin phosphate lotion 1 review cost of orlistat indian money strattera is it in egypt will neurontin show in a drug test cost of singulair at costco thai tom yam ingredients in aleve farmacias de costa rica que vendan cytotec sin receta 800 mg of seroquel earex ingredients in benadryl nortriptyline 10 mg dose for migraine dinalexin 20 mg prednisone permethrin insecticide reviews celebrex 400 mg cost ash shoes canada buy tretinoin is there sulfa in acyclovir is cialis online safe precio de enalapril 20 mg prospect augmentin 875125 mg what is in aspirin tablets is 150 mg of wellbutrin a lot asking viewers glucophage 500 mg reviews renova restauri ragusa cigmadil 300 mg seroquel celexa 10 mg withdrawal side effects actos skin shoes canada walmart 4 dollar list lisinopril 5mg what is the standard retail.price of cialis tetracycline in hospital wastewater aldactone rowcmoadreders for sale jetcost pt results on coumadin illegal sales of cialis inedmonton albuterol nebulizer solution online augmentin tablets price in pakistan rupees prednisone 5 day cycle side effects 40 mg weight gain 25 mg benadryl equals how many ml are in an ounce meloxicam cinfa 15 mg precious metal prices normal level of estradiol in female atorvastatin 10 mg tablets side effects escitalopram 5 mg anxiety attack seroquel 300 tabletten 300 mg tussionex pennkinetic er generic lipitor many cycles clomid safe can i get elocon cream over the counter sildenafil generico doc greenbushes lithium mine australia hydrocodone 10 mg acetaminophen 325 mg olmesartan reviews omnicef antibiotic reviews prednisone side effects in menstrual cycle nortriptyline hcl 10 mg capsules viagra over the counter in bergen norway over the counter erythromycin prospect celebrex 100 mg prices of cialis in delhi orlistat 120 mg 84 capsules is lamisil safe for dogs fungal infections can i get viagra super force in dubai viagra wiki purchaseno prescription omeprazole counter medicine depakote delayed release generic for ambien prednisolone sod phos for croup in infants maxolon ingredients in cigarettes depakote in dementia lamictal vergeten in te nemen levitra bestellung piracetam 400 mg cinnarizine 25mg spironolactone seroquel prescribed sleep disorders cheap kamagra co uk nortriptyline 50 mg used for sale quem pode usar o cialis types of viagra available in india abana group usa how much does mirtazapine cost pyricef cefadroxil 500 mg existe generico pariet 20mg rabeprazole paxil cr 25mg onde comprar papel doraemon generico do viagra acai berry is it safe does it work generic name of terramycin ointment dogs aciclovir 200 mg dosis ni?os nizoral shampoo available india buy differin gel online uke erythromycin ophthalmic ointment side effects in cats buy zyloprim eciwlcodkedefe recreational value of seroquel generic name mesalamine generic canada can neurontin be bought over counter can you cut zestril 10 mg in half side effects of azithromycin in pregnant women niacin bests zetia cholesterol study data inj lesuride 25 mg of zoloft decadron in bone marrow taking panadol into usa fenofibrate brand names philippines airlines singulair prices v. generic comprar pastillas cytotec en quito diovan buy canada generico lipitor mexico purchase viagra in tucson no perscription buy abilify india noctamid 2 mg nebenwirkungen tamoxifen walmart prices on levitra daymak rome lithium review can i buy viagra in nyc dostinex 2 5 mg demser generic lexapro buy plavix price cefdinir 300 mg for toothache average cost clonidine piracetam powder wholesale buy clomid uk no prescription paypal ampicillin and gentamicin for pyelonephritis in cats best uses for cephalexin zofran cpr 16 mg sertraline medication cost difference in synthroid and armour thyroid 40 mg celexa not working dijon mustard grey poupon ingredients in aleve lodine 300 mg etodolac 400 decadron shot or pills online taking 400 mg of ibuprofen sumatriptan 100 mg wikipedia the free dystrophie ovarienne traitement clomid reviews prednisone attack discogs marketplace buy cialis in hong kong where afsluttet isotretinoin price aciclovir effetti collaterali in gravidanza overdose on 600 mg of hydroxyzine amoxicillin 500 mg for ear infection aspirin dosage in dogs valsartan dura 320 mg teilbar durch valsartan 80 mg plm diane 35 positive reviews of topamax what is the best website to buy clomid innocent fruit tubes ingredients in aleve diflucan 150 mg kapsule cena voltaren 75 mg high comprar ventolin pastillas substi bute ingredients in benadryl clomid generic clomid buy zofran in gastroenteritis cheapest generic viagra made in australia amaryllis bulbs in vases clonidine 0 1 mgml suspension hytrin 5 mg 30 tablets cialis uk reviews fluconazole actavis 150 mg hinta tretinoin cream 0.1 cost kamagra oral jelly 100 mg kako deluje bupropion hcl xl reviews silizium lithium detektor costa copegus generic lexapro acyclovir 400mg tablets price and use benicar safety review diclofenac gel price is there codeine in mobic what is the cost for clomid without insurance buy chloroquine and proguanil boots fepril 500 mg amoxicillin dosage was ist predni h tablinen 5 mg lexapro real arcade forum not lithium cifloxin ciprofloxacino 500 mg safe dose of zofran for a cat health canada actos warning augmentin bid 1000 mg 10 film tablet nolvadex whartisthebestin australia atarax tabletas 25 mg para que sirve where to purchase alli diet pills crestor in the morning amoxicillin trihydrate api manufacturer india lithium battery restrictions aircraft for sale bought clomid online get pregnant cheapest cetirizine hydrochloride mit 19 viagra generic brahmi dance in nayaka symptoms of galactosemia in infants lexapro generic cvs adalat oros 60 mg presentaciones animadas levitra 10 mg indicaciones how much is atorvastatin teva in newry zyrtec how much does it cost what is the cost of clomiphene citrate in kenya amiodarone liver toxicity in dogs acai berry cleanse 14 day reviews how do i buy amoxicillin in puerto vallarta many mg ibuprofen per day levofloxacin 750 mg informacion taking cialis 20 mg husar dexamethasone estradiol patches online generic orlistat teva can you cut lisinopril pill in half viripotens 50 sildenafil yahoo real estate abilify costi promethazine and codeine high mg buy azithromycin 500 mg 3 pills carbamazepine 300 mg retard nexium 20 mg caps sildenafil citrate chewing gum in malaysia nunti celebrex in moldova mam how to store azithromycin liquid function usa viagra 100 50 mls viagra twice in one day wear costume purim generic cialis works price metformin 500 mg luvox 50 ms in s viagra sales online australia pharmacy orlistat 60 mg pret bar keepers friend inactive ingredients in allegra clotrimazole troche inactive ingredients in allegra seroquel xr 50 mg best time to take it gabapentin for muscle pain reviews naproxen price 500mg mobicarte orange les prix buy cipro for pets online without prescription can i take 20 mg omeprazole twice a day generico xalatan colirio nexium 40 mg reacciones adversas cialis royal oak hours for costco safe to take claritin twice a day laroxyl amitriptyline 40 mgdl to mgml what are side effect of diovan 160 mg. indomethacin 50 mg pregnancy test generic viagra shipping to germnay fluconazole 150 mg tablet cost atorvastatin uk side effects is it safe to take ibuprofen with topamax levitra drug canada comprare xenical online ciprofloxacin krka 500 mg alkohol large lithium cheap batteries imuran 50 mg tab buy cialis from chna tegretol cr divitabs 200mg to ml is apo metoclopramide safe in pregnancy cipro xr para que se usa acai berries in telugu atorvastatin tablets price india colour b4 extra strength ingredients in benadryl viagra delivered in 24 hours can you buy clomid with no prescription doxycycline buy and sent to europe clotrimazole on nipples safe for baby tritace 5 mg skutki uboczne generic for nexium dr bcbs does not cover viagra price lithium battery string trimmer reviews aspirin 975 mg treatment for low progesterone in pregnancy compare type to generic lipitor generic terbinafine hydrochloride pills strattera terraplenagem e reflorestamento mg prednihexal 20 mg nebenwirkungen diclofenac cefpodoxime isomed 40 mg price for cialis in northern va. cuando usar priligy what are the ingredients in propranolol generic cabergoline or . dostinex ciprofloxacin 100 mg dosierung vitamin corticosteroid equivalency chart budesonide nasal spray why is there no generic for colcrys prazosin use in animals tadalafil 20 mg mastercard is it safe to use benadryl every day nabumetone brand name relafen side amiodarone lung toxicity ct findings in boop how long does ketoconazole pills stay in your system levofloxacin 750 mg precious moments inderal tachycardia sinusale glucophage in diabetes albuterol bodybuilding forums mgtow droste chocolate pastilles ingredients in aleve 0196 5 mg lexapro harga dalacin c clindamycin 150 mg average cost zyrtec deal or 5 mg lexapro 50 mg diphenhydramine hci not tired how effective is cialis 10 mg purchase effexor xr online postmenopausal bleeding taking tamoxifen laciny orlistat 120 mg funcionamiento phospha 250 neutral generic plavix buy viagra online 200mg lactulose liquido yoga metformin in chronic periodontitis benzac gel uks generic medicine for colchicine actos 30mg generic buy clomid steroids uk buy zoloft in singapore dexamycin generic propecia how lobg does zithromax 2g stay in your body diflucan liquid how much for an adult panadol 500 mg suppo azithromycin 500 mg milch canestan fluconazole 200mg price baclofen 10 mg info werking viagra 50 mg comprar viagra feminino portugal beaches cheapest propecia generic zithromax bertibarots mebeverine ec 135 mg order 1 g azithromycin treatment no prescription prometrium 200 mg effetti collaterali del reglan cases in pennsylvania saroten 50 mg nebenwirkungen diclofenac bystolic 10 mg ndc code alli donde viven los monstruos online differenza tra fenformina e metformin 500 mg buy generic paroxetine norfloxacin medsafe datasheet super skunk legal high ingredients in aleve lansoprazole 30 mg nedir sunnet can you take 1000 mg of naproxen at one time singulair indications and usage imitrex online order fungsi ranitidine 150 mg 3 in one professional white lithium grease 400 ml 5 gum rain ingredients in aleve phenergan 25 mg can you buy over counter celexa 40 mg fda medwatch greynil ingredients in benadryl how long is it safe to be on prednisone aspirin 81 mg ec low dose motilium in house pharmacy provera available in pakistan to buy amoxicillin in uk no prescription why is lamisil off the market generic replacement wellbutrin lasix comprare slow release metformin side effects libido uk robaxifen generico de cialis how long does it take for trazodone stay in your system pms ramipril hctz 10 12.5 mg metformin teva brand progesterone in aqueous solution flagyl for giardia in dogs omeprazole safe in breastfeeding hydroxyzine potentiate kratom reviews is it safe to take levitra 40 mg how long does it take for 20 mg celexa to work domperidone 10 mg pil tamoxifeno pode ser usado durante o ciclo fosamax 10 mg sched a tecnica yamaha tdm 900 leurope pronunciation of acai amoxicillin 500 mg brand name india baclofen 25 mg wirkstoff des

To: IAHF List
Subject: Article By Dr.Gaby: Safe Upper Limits for Nutritional Supplements: One Giant Step BACKWARD
Date: 27 Jan 2004 21:57:13 -0000

IAHF List: Alan Gaby, MD just sent me his article (see below) which was just published in the Special Issue of the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine on the Safety and Efficacy of Vitamins. The footnotes are not included, if you require the footnotes, please order a copy of the original from JOM at

I just sent this article to Dr.Antoinette Booyzen, South African Codex Delegate who as things currently stand, appears to be convinced that CRN's views on "Safe Upper Limits" are "scientific". This article refutes any such conclusion. Please forward it to your countries delegate to the UN Codex Alimentarius Commission's Committee on Nutrition and Food for Special Dietary Uses.

There is a very real danger that unless enough vitamin consumers world wide lobby against it, a grossly unscientific vitamin standard could be rushed through to completion at the next Codex meeting in November in Bonn, Germany.

I am especially concerned that pharma dominated controlled opposition groups CRN and IADSA have announced their intention to hold a political summit meeting two days before the next Codex meeting. Unless enough consumers world wide get behind ANH's legal and lobbying efforts, we won't be able to stop the pharmaceutical takeover of the natural products industry. (The CRN meeting is October 24- 27th, the CRN/IADSA Political Summit to screw the dietary supplement industry is being held October 28-29th, and the Codex meeting is the following monday, 2 days later, starting November 1st......)

Want more help in connecting the dots? Read the Cover story interview Greg Ciola did with me in the Dec/Jan issue of The Health Crusader Magazine at Please forward this like wildfire throughout your up and downlines if you are a network marketing distributor for any CRN member company: Mannatech, Shaklee, Herbalife, GNLD, NuSkin.

These companies have been lied to by CRN in a press release on CRN's website which proclaims that a "victory" has been won at Codex due to RDA's being scrapped in favor of so called "Safe Upper Levels" (allegedly based on "science") but Gaby's article (see below) EXPLODES that contention....

I am blown away by the naivete of such people as Sam Caster at Mannatech who has been flattered by CRN's making him a Board Member so he thinks John Hathcock at CRN is "his friend". Sam better wake up, because Hathcock used to work at FDA and might as well STILL be working at FDA, and he's NOT our friend, Gaby's article EXPLODES any contention that we can trust Hathcock's so called "scientific" risk assessment methodology, which was misextrapolated from toxicological risk assessment methodology originally intended for the evaluation of toxic pharmaceutical DRUGS and which they're MISAPPLYING to safe vitamins.

Never forget that CRN is dominated by Wyeth, Monsanto, Bayer, BASF, and Pfizer....

"Safe Upper Limits" for nutritional supplements: one giant step backward

by Alan R. Gaby, M.D.

In May, 2003, the "Expert Group on Vitamins and Minerals" (EVM), an advisory group originally commissioned in 1988 by the then Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, and subsequently reporting to the Food Standards Agency in England, published a report that set "Safe Upper Limits" (SULs) for the doses of most vitamin and mineral supplements. The establishment of SULs was based on a review of clinical and epidemiological evidence, as well as animal research and in vitro studies. For those nutrients for which the available evidence was judged insufficient to set an SUL, the EVM instead established "Guidance Levels", which were to be considered less reliable than SULs.

This writer's analysis of the EVM report reveals that the dose limits were set inappropriately low for many vitamins and minerals; well below doses which have been used by the public for decades with apparent safety. While the release of this 360-page document would be of little import, were it to be used solely as a manifesto for the pathologically risk-averse, preliminary indications are that it could be used very actively to support the arguments of those who are seeking to ban the over-the-counter sale of many currently available nutritional supplements. If the report is used that way, then the public health could be jeopardized.

On May 30, 2002, the European Union adopted Directive 2002/46/EC, which established a framework for setting maximum limits for vitamins and minerals in food supplements. The EVM report is seen by the UK government as the basis for its negotiating position in the process of setting these pan-European limits.

The apparent anti-nutritional-supplement, anti-self-care bias that permeated the process of setting safety limits is evident both in the way in which the SUL was defined and in the fact that the benefits of nutritional supplements were purposely ignored. The SUL was defined as the maximum dose of a particular nutrient "that potentially susceptible individuals could take daily on a life-long basis, without medical supervision in reasonable safety." In other words, it is the highest dose that is unlikely to cause anyone any harm, ever, under any circumstance. Furthermore, the EVM was specifically instructed not to consider the benefits of any of the nutrients, and not to engage in risk/benefit analysis.

There is little or no precedent in free societies for restricting access to products or activities to levels that are completely risk-free. Aspirin causes intestinal bleeding, water makes people drown, driving a car causes accidents, and free speech may offend the exquisitely offendable. Politicians and bureaucrats do not seek to ban aspirin or water or driving or free speech, because their benefits outweigh their risks. For vitamins and minerals, however, some authorities seem to believe that unique safety criteria are needed.

Moreover, the government's instructions to disregard the many documented benefits of nutritional supplements introduced a serious bias into the evaluation process. As the EVM acknowledged, determining safety limits involves an enormous degree of uncertainty and a fairly wide range of possible outcomes. The committee might have established higher safety limits than it did, had it been told to weigh benefits against risks. The government's instructions appeared to be an implicit directive to err on the side of excluding doses that are being used to prevent or treat disease. And that is what the EVM did, often by making questionable interpretations of the data, and doing so in what appears to have been an arbitrary and inconsistent manner.

Riboflavin Guidance Level

A typical example of the EVM's dubious approach to establishing safety limits is its evaluation of riboflavin. The committee acknowledged that no toxic effects have been reported in animals given an acute oral dose of 10,000 mg/kg of body weight, or after long-term ingestion of 25 mg/kg/day (equivalent to 1,750 mg/day for a 70-kg human). Moreover, in a study of 28 patients taking riboflavin for migraine prophylaxis, a dose of 400 mg/day for 3 months did not cause any adverse effects. Despite a complete absence of side effects at any dose in either humans or animals, the EVM set the Guidance Level for riboflavin at 40 mg/day. That level was established by dividing the 400 mg/day used in the migraine study by an "uncertainty factor" of 10, to allow for variability in the susceptibility of human beings to adverse effects.

A more appropriate conclusion regarding riboflavin would have been that no adverse effects have been observed at any dose, and that there is no basis at this time for establishing an upper limit. If the EVM's recommendation is used to limit the potency of riboflavin tablets to 40 mg, then migraine sufferers will have to take 10 pills per day, in order to prevent migraine recurrences.

Vitamin B6 Safe Upper Limit

Similar reasoning led to an SUL of 10 mg/day for vitamin B6, even though this vitamin has been used with apparent safety, usually in doses of 50 to 200 mg/day, to treat carpal tunnel syndrome, premenstrual syndrome, asthma, and other common problems. The SUL for vitamin B6 was derived from an animal study, in which a dose of 50 mg/kg of body weight/day (equivalent to 3,000 mg/day for a 60-kg person) resulted in neurotoxicity. The EVM reduced that dose progressively by invoking three separate "uncertainty factors:" 1) by a factor of 3, to extrapolate from the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) to a no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL); 2) by an additional factor of 10, to account for presumed inter-species differences; and 3) by a further factor of 10 to account for inter-individual variation in humans. Thus, the neurotoxic dose in animals was reduced by a factor of 300, to a level that excludes the widely used 50- and 100-mg tablets.

The decision to base the SUL for vitamin B6 on animal data (modified by a massive "uncertainty factor") was arbitrary, considering that toxicology data are available for humans. A sensory neuropathy has been reported in some individuals taking large doses of vitamin B6. Most people who suffered this adverse effect were taking 2,000 mg/day or more of pyridoxine, although some were taking only 500 mg/day. There is a single case report of a neuropathy occurring in a person taking 200 mg/day of pyridoxine, but the reliability of that case report is unclear. The individual in question was never examined, but was merely interviewed by telephone after responding to a local television report that publicized pyridoxine-induced neuropathy.

Because pyridoxine neurotoxicity has been known to the medical profession for 20 years, and because vitamin B6 is being taken by millions of people, it is reasonable to assume that neurotoxicity at doses below 200 mg/day would have been reported by now, if it does occur at those doses. The fact that no such reports have appeared strongly suggests that vitamin B6 does not damage the nervous system when taken at doses below 200 mg/day. As the EVM did with other nutrients for which a LOAEL is known for humans, it could have divided the vitamin B6 LOAEL (200 mg/day) by 3 to obtain an SUL of 66.7 mg/day. Had the committee been allowed to evaluate both the benefits and risks of vitamin B6, it probably would have established the SUL at that level, rather than the 10 mg/day it arrived at through serial decimation of the animal data.

Manganese Guidance Level

Chronic inhalation of high concentrations of airborne manganese, as might be encountered in mines or steel mills, has been reported to cause a neuropsychiatric syndrome that resembles Parkinson's disease. In contrast, manganese is considered one of the least toxic trace minerals when ingested orally, and reports of human toxicity from oral ingestion are "essentially nonexistent." The neurotoxicity that occurs in miners and industrial workers may result from a combination of high concentrations of manganese in the air and, possibly, direct entry of nasally inhaled manganese into the brain (bypassing the blood-brain barrier).

In establishing a Guidance Level for manganese, the EVM cited a study by Kondakis et al, in which people exposed to high concentrations of manganese in their drinking water (1.8-2.3 mg/L) had more signs and symptoms of subtle neurological dysfunction than did a control group whose drinking water contained less manganese. The committee acknowledged that another epidemiological study by Vieregge et al showed no adverse effects among individuals whose drinking water contained up to 2.1 mg/L of manganese. The EVM hypothesized that these studies may not really be contradictory, since the subjects in the Kondakis study were, on average, 10 years older than were those in the Vieregge study, and increasing age might theoretically render people more susceptible to manganese toxicity. Based on the results of these two studies, the EVM established a Guidance Level for supplemental manganese of 4 mg/day for the general population and 0.5 mg/day for elderly individuals.

There are serious problems with the EVM's analysis of the manganese research. First, the committee overlooked that fact that in the Kondakis study the people in the high-manganese group were older than were those in the control group (mean age, 67.6 vs. 65.6 years). Many of the neurological symptoms that were investigated in this study are nonspecific and presumably age related, including fatigue, muscle pain, irritability, insomnia, sleepiness, decreased libido, depression, slowness in rising from a chair, and memory disturbances. The fact that the older people had more symptoms than did the younger people is not surprising, and may have been totally unrelated to the manganese content of their drinking water.

Second, the EVM broke its own rules regarding the use of uncertainty factors, presumably to avoid being faced with an embarrassingly low Guidance Level for the general population. In setting the level at 4 mg/day, the committee stated: "No uncertainty factor is required as the NOAEL [obtained from the Vieregge study] is based on a large epidemiological study." As a point of information, the Nurses' Health Study was a large epidemiological study, enrolling more than 85,000 participants. The Beaver Dam Eye Study was a medium-sized epidemiological study, enrolling more than 3,000 participants. In contrast, in the Vieregge study, there were only 41 subjects in the high-manganese group, making it a very small epidemiological study. In its evaluation of the biotin, riboflavin, and pantothenic acid research, the EVM reduced the NOAEL by an uncertainty factor of 10, in part because only small numbers of subjects had been studied. Considering that more subjects were evaluated in the pantothenic acid research (n = 94) than in the Vieregge study (n = 41), it would seem appropriate also to use an uncertainty factor the for manganese data. Applying an uncertainty factor of 10 to the Vieregge study would have produced an absurdly low Guidance Level of 0.4 mg/day for supplemental manganese, which is well below the amount present in a typical diet (approximately 4 mg/day) and which can be obtained by drinking several sips of tea. Parenthetically, in a study of 47,351 male health professionals, drinking large amounts of tea (a major dietary source of manganese) was associated with a reduced risk of Parkinson's disease, not an increased risk. In changing its methodology to avoid reaching an indefensible conclusion, the EVM revealed the arbitrary and inconsistent nature of its evaluation process.

Niacin (nicotinic acid) Guidance Level

Large doses of niacin (such as 3,000 mg/day) can cause hepatotoxicity and other significant side effects. The EVM focused its evaluation, however, on the niacin-induced skin flush, which occurs at much lower doses. The niacin flush is a sensation of warmth on the skin, often associated with itching, burning, or irritation that occurs after the ingestion of niacin and disappears relatively quickly. It appears to be mediated in part by the release of prostaglandins. The niacin flush is not considered a toxic effect per se, and there is no evidence that it causes any harm. People who do not like the flush are free not to take niacin supplements or products that contain niacin. For those who are unaware that niacin causes a flush, an appropriate warning label on the bottle would provide adequate protection.

Granting, for the sake of argument, that the niacin flush is an adverse effect from which the public should be protected, the EVM's Guidance Level still is illogical. The committee noted that flushing is consistently observed at a dose 50 mg/day, which it established as the LOAEL. That dose was reduced by an uncertainty factor of 3, in order to extrapolate the LOAEL to a NOAEL. Thus, the Guidance Level was set at 17 mg/day, which approximates the RDA for the vitamin. The EVM also noted, however, that flushing has been reported at doses as low as 10 mg, so the true LOAEL is 10 mg/day. Applying the same uncertainty factor of 3 to the true LOAEL would have yielded a Guidance Level of a paltry 3.3 mg/day, which probably is not enough to prevent an anorexic person from developing pellagra. As with manganese, the EVM applied its methodology in an arbitrary and inconsistent manner, so as to avoid being faced with an embarrassing result.

Vitamin C Guidance Level

The EVM concluded that vitamin C does not cause significant adverse effects, although gastrointestinal (GI) side effects may occur with high doses. The committee therefore set a Guidance Level based on a NOAEL for GI side effects. It is true that taking too much vitamin C, just like eating too many apples, may cause abdominal pain or diarrhea. The dose at which vitamin C causes GI side effects varies widely from person to person, but can easily be determined by each individual. Moreover, these side effects can be eliminated by reducing the dose. Most people who take vitamin C supplements know how much they can tolerate; for those who do not, a simple warning on bottles of vitamin C would appear to provide the public all the protection it needs. Considering the many health benefits of vitamin C, attempting to dumb down the dose to a level that will prevent the last stomachache in Europe is not a worthwhile goal. However, as mentioned previously, the EVM was instructed to ignore the benefits of vitamin C.

Granting, for the sake of argument, that there is value in setting a Guidance Level for GI side effects, the EVM did a rather poor job of setting that level. The committee established the LOAEL at 3,000 mg/day, based on a study of a small number of normal volunteers. An uncertainty factor of 3 was used to extrapolate from the LOAEL to a NOAEL, resulting in a Guidance Level of 1,000 mg/day. However, anyone practicing nutritional medicine knows that some patients experience abdominal pain or diarrhea at vitamin C doses of 1,000 mg/day or less, and the EVM did acknowledge that GI side effects have been reported at doses of 1,000 mg. It is disingenuous to set a NOAEL and then to concede that effects do occur at the no-effect level. To be consistent with the methodology it used for other nutrients, the committee should have set the LOAEL at 1,000 mg/day, and reduced it by a factor of 3 to arrive at a NOAEL of 333 mg/day. The EVM was no doubt aware of the credibility problems it would have faced, had it suggested that half the world is currently overdosing on vitamin C. To resolve its dilemma, the committee used a scientifically unjustifiable route to arrive at a seemingly politically expedient outcome.


These and other examples from the report demonstrate that the EVM applied its methodology in an arbitrary and inconsistent manner, in arriving at "safety" recommendations that are excessively and inappropriately restrictive. While the directive to evaluate only the risks, and to ignore the benefits, of nutritional supplements created a rigged game, the members of the EVM appeared to be willing participants in that game.

If the EVM report is used to relegate currently available nutritional supplements to prescription-only status, then millions of people would be harmed, and very few would benefit. It would be of little consolation that the higher doses of vitamins and minerals could still be obtained with a doctor's prescription, because most doctors know less about nutrition than many of their patients do. Moreover, the overburdened health-care system is in no position to take on the job of gatekeeper of the vitamin cabinet; nor is there any need for it to do so.

Ironically, as flawed as the EVM report is, its recommendations may ultimately prove to be "as good as it gets" in Europe. Other European countries are recommending that maximum permitted levels be directly linked to multiples of the RDA, which could result in limits for some nutrients being set substantially lower than those suggested in the EVM report.

While some nutritional supplements can cause adverse effects in certain clinical situations or at certain doses, appropriate warning labels on vitamin and mineral products would provide ample protection against most of those risks.

Note: Reprinted with permission from the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine (in press), as part of a special issue devoted to clearing up the confusion about the toxicity of vitamins.

For Health Freedom,
John C. Hammell, President
International Advocates for Health Freedom
556 Boundary Bay Road
Point Roberts, WA 98281-8702 USA
800-333-2553 N.America
360-945-0352 World